Loading...

Productivity and Profitability of Fodder Cowpea Cultivars under Various Zinc Management Practices in IGP of India

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4599    | Article Id: LR-4599 | Page : 1211-1218
Citation :- Productivity and Profitability of Fodder Cowpea Cultivars under Various Zinc Management Practices in IGP of India.Legume Research.2021.(44):1211-1218
Manisha, Rakesh Kumar, Hardev Ram, Rajesh Kumar Meena, Dinesh Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Kuldeep Singh drdudi_rk@rediffmail.com
Address : ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.
Submitted Date : 27-02-2021
Accepted Date : 12-04-2021

Abstract

Background: Soils of North-Western Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP) are deficient in zinc content which may lead to lower forage yield of cowpea. Henceforth, the adequate supply of zinc either through soil or foliar spray and selection of suitable cultivar of cowpea could enhance the fodder productivity.
Methods: A field experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design during Kharif season, 2019 to assess the effect of different zinc management practices (control; 10 kg ZnSO4; 20 kg ZnSO4; 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at 20 DAS; 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at 20 and 40 DAS) on productivity and profitability of cowpea cultivars (C-152; MFC-08-14; MFC-09-1) and post-harvest fertility status of soil.
Result: Cowpea cv. C-152 showed the highest growth attributes, green fodder yield, nutrient content as well as uptake and net returns. Among different zinc management practices, the application of 20 kg ZnSO4 as basal application or 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at 20 and 40 DAS recorded significantly highest growth, green fodder yield, nutrient content as well as uptake and net returns. Significantly highest soil OC, available N, K and Zn were also noted under these treatments. It is inferred that cowpea cv. C-152 and application of either 20 kg ZnSO4 as basal or 0.5% ZnSO4 as foliar spray at 20 and 40 DAS were found the most productive and profitable approach and sustained the soil fertility status.

Keywords

Cultivars Fodder cowpea Nutrient content Productivity Profitability Soil fertility Zinc

References

  1. Adjei-Nsiah, S., Kuyper, T.W., Leeuwis, C., Abekoe, M.K., Cobbinah, J., Sakyi-Dawson, O. and Giller, K.E. (2008). Farmers’ agronomic and social evaluation of productivity, yield and N2-fixation in different cowpea varieties and their subsequent residual N effects on a succeeding maize crop. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 80(3): 199-209.
  2. Arunachalam, P., Kannan, P., Prabukumar, G. and Govindaraj, M. (2013). Zinc deficiency in Indian soils with special focus to enrich zinc in peanut. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(50): 6681-6688.
  3. Ayisi, K.K., Nkgapele, R.J. and Dakora, F.D. (2000). Nodule formation and function in six varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) grown in a nitrogen-rich field soil in South Africa. Symbiosis. 28: 17-31.
  4. Das, K., Dang, R., Shivananda, T.N. and Sur, P. (2005). Interaction effect between phosphorus and zinc on their availability in soil in relation to their contents in stevia (Stevia rebaudiana). The Scientific World Journal. 5: 490-495.
  5. de Oliveira A,É., dos Santos, F.E., de Oliveira, Q.G., Camacho, M.A. and Dresch, M.D. (2012). Nutritional efficiency of cowpea varieties in the absorption of phosphorus. Agronomia Colombiana. 30(3): 419-424.
  6. Debnath, P., Pattanaaik, S.K., Sah, D., Chandra, G. and Pandey, A.K. (2018). Effect of boron and zinc fertilization on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) in Inceptisols of Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil. 66(2): 229-34.
  7. Gao, X., Zou, C., Zhang, F., van der Zee, S.E. and Hoffland, E. (2005). Tolerance to zinc deficiency in rice correlates with zinc uptake and translocation. Plant and Soil. 278(1-2): 253-261.
  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. (2nd Edn.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
  9. Hafeez, B., Khanif, Y.M. and Saleem, M. (2013). Role of zinc in plant nutrition - A review. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 3(2): 374-391.
  10. Hegde, V.S. and Mishra, S.K. (2009). Landraces of cowpea, [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], as potential sources of genes for unique characters in breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 56(5): 615-627.
  11. Hindoriya, P.S., Meena, R.K., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Ram, H., Meena, V.K., Ginwal, D. and Dutta, S. (2019). Productivity and profitability of cereal-legume forages vis-a-vis their effect on soil nutrient status in Indo-Gangetic plains. Legume Research. 42(6): 812-817.
  12. Jackson M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall India Private Limited, New Delhi, 498.
  13. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, pp. 111-203.
  14. Keram, K.S., Sharma, B.L. and Sawarkar, S.D. (2012). Impact of Zn application on yield, quality, nutrients uptake and soil fertility in a medium deep black soil (Vertisol). International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology. 1(5): 563-571.
  15. Kumar, B. (2017). Genetic variability of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) genotypes to varied levels of phosphorus under rainfed condition of Jharkhand. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 6(23): 1970-1974.
  16. Kumar, R., Rathore, D.K., Singh, M., Kumar, P. and Khippal, A. (2016). Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea. Legume Research. 39(2): 262-267.
  17. Kumar, R., Singh, M., Meena, B.S., Ram, H., Parihar, C.M., Kumar, S., Yadav, M.R., Meena, R.K., Kumar, U. and Meena, V.K. (2017). Zinc management effects on quality and nutrient yield of fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 87(8): 1013-17.
  18. Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 42(3): 421-428.
  19. Mallikarjun, Ram, H., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Meena, R.K. and Kumar, R. (2020). Effect of rhizobium inoculation and tillage practices on fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Legume Research, accepted on 25-5-2020 (doi: 10.18805/LR-4373).
  20. Mfeka, N. (2017). Morphology and mineral content of cowpea lines in response to planting date and zinc application rate. Ph.D. thesis submitted to Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Wellington, p. 108.
  21. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium carbonate. USDA, Washington D.C., (Vol. 939), p. 19.
  22. Oseni, T.O. (2009). Growth and zinc uptake of sorghum and cowpea in response to phosphorus and zinc fertilization. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 5(6): 670-674. 
  23. Pandya, C.B. and Bhatt, V.R. (2007). Effect of different nutrient levels on yield and nutrient content of fodder cowpea. Legume Research. 30: 218-220.
  24. Prasad, R. (2007). Zinc. In: Crop Nutrition – Principle and Practices. New Vishal, Publications, New Delhi. pp. 191-218.
  25. Prasad, R., Shivay, Y.S. and Kumar, D. (2016). Interactions of zinc with other nutrients in soils and plants–a review. Indian Journal of Fertilisers. 12(5): 16-26.
  26. Rathore, D.K., Kumar, R., Kumar, P., Meena, V.K., Kumar, U., Joshi and Yadav, T. (2015a). Economics analysis of phosphorus and zinc nutrition in fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Agricultural Science Digest. 35(4): 311-313.
  27. Rathore, D.K., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Meena, V.K., Kumar, U., Soni, P.G., Yadav, T. and Makarana, G. (2015b). Phosphorus and zinc fertilization in fodder cowpea-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 36(4): 333-338.
  28. Rathore, D.K., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Kumar, P., Ttyagi, N., Datt, C., Meena, B., Soni, P.G. and Makrana, G. (2015c). Effect of phosphorus and zinc Application on nutritional characteristics of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Indian Journal of Animal. Nutrition 32(4): 388-392.
  29. Rhoden, E.G. and Allen, J.R. (1982). Effect of B, Mn and Zn on nodulation and N2-fixation in southern peas. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 13(4): 243-258.
  30. Richards, L.A. (1968). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook. 60: 210-220.
  31. Safaya, N.M. and Singh, B. (1977). Differential susceptibility of two varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to phosphorus-induced zinc deficiency. Plant and Soil. 48(2): 279-290.
  32. Singh, K.K., Praharaj, C.S., Choudhary, A.K., Kumar, N. and Venkatesh, M.S. (2011). Zinc response in pulses. Indian Journal of Fertilisers. 7(10): 118-126.
  33. Singh, M.V. (2008). Micronutrient deficiencies in crops and soils in India. In: Micronutrient Deficiencies in Global Crop Production. (Ed.) Alloway, B.J. Springer Netherlands. pp. 93-125. 
  34. Soni, J. and Kushwaha, H.S. (2020). Effect of foliar spray of zinc and iron on productivity of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczeck]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 9(1): 108-111.
  35. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for assessment of available nitrogen in rice soils. Current Science. 25: 259-260.
  36. Velayudham, K., Babu, C. and Iyanar, K. (2015). Influence of phosphorus levels on green fodder yield and quality of fodder cowpea genotypes. Madras Agricultural Journal. 102(1-3): 40-42.
  37. Walkley, A.J. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37(1): 29-38.
  38. Win, K.T. and Oo, A.Z. (2015). Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance during early vegetative growth of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] from Myanmar. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 4(4): 449-455.
  39. Yilmaz, A., Ekiz, H., Torun, B., Gultekin, I., Karanlik, S., Bagci, S.A. and Cakmak, I. (1997). Effect of different zinc application methods on grain yield and zinc concentration in wheat cultivars grown on zinc deficient calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 20(4-5): 461-471.
  40. Zargar, S.M., Mahajan, R., Farhat, S., Nazir, M., Mir, R.A., Nazir, M. and Mallick, S.A. (2015). Understanding the role of iron and zinc in animals and crop plants from genomics perspective. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 9(2): 181-196.

Global Footprints