Production Potential of Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4566    | Article Id: LR-4566 | Page : 727-734
Citation :- Production Potential of Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as Influenced by Crop Geometry and Plant Growth Regulators.Legume Research.2022.(45):727-734
S.U. Pawar, W.N. Narkhede, D.N. Gokhale, I.A.B. Mirza pawarsu7@rediffmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402, Maharashtra, India.
Submitted Date : 9-12-2020
Accepted Date : 13-08-2021


Background: Pigeonpea being highly branching and indeterminate growth habit responds very well to crop geometry. Hence to achieve potential yields, it is important to maintain optimum plant population which can effectively utilize available moisture, nutrients and solar radiation. The plant growth regulators are also known to enhance the source sink relationship and stimulate the translocation of photo assimilates, thereby increase the productivity.
Methods: A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of Agronomy Department, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani during kharif season of 2018 and 2019. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with four main plot treatments comprised of four crop geometries as 90 cm x 20 cm, 120 cm x 20 cm 60-120 cm x 20 cm and 75-150 cm x 20 cm and sub plot treatments were five treatments on foliar application of plant growth regulators i.e. NAA @ 40 ppm, Mepiquat chloride @ 50 g a.i. ha-1, Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm, Chlormequat Chloride @ 75 g a.i ha-1 and control.
Result: The crop geometry of 120 cm x 20 cm and 75-150 cm x 20 cm recorded higher values of all yield parameters followed by crop geometry of 60-120 cm x 20 cm. While the seed, straw and biological yield of pigeonpea as well as highest net realization of Rs. 72072 ha-1 was obtained with crop geometry of 60-120 cm x 20 cm followed by 90 cm x 20 cm. Among the plant growth regulators foliar application of Brassinosteroids @ 0.1 ppm (G3) tended to recorded higher yield parameters, seed yield and fertility coefficient of pigeonpea as well as highest net realization followed by foliar application of NAA @ 40 ppm.


Crop geometry Pigeonpea Plant growth regulators Productivity


  1. Bhavi, R., Desai, B.K. and Vinodakumar, S.N. (2013). Effect of planting geometry on the yield, nutrient availability and economics of pigeonpea genotypes. Trends in Biosciences. 6(6). pp. 773-775.
  2. Bora, R.K. and Sarma, C.M. (2006). Effectof gibberellic acid and cycocel on growth, Yield and Protein Content of Pea. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 5: 324-330.
  3. Chandewar, K.B., Khawale, V.S., Jiotode, D.J., Pagar, P.C. and Upakar, A.L. (2016). Effect of fertilizer levels and mepiquat chloride on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of pigeonpea. Journal of Soils and Crops. 26 (2): 238-242.
  4. Jadhav G.N., Deotale, R.D., Gavhane, D.B., Chute, K.H. (2017). Implant of foliar sprays of polyamine (Putrescine) and NAA on chemical and biochemical parameters and yield of pigeonpea. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 6 Special issue (3): 407-412.
  5. Kalyankar S.V, Kadam, G.R, Borgaonkar, S.B, Deshmukh, D.D. and Kadam, B.P. (2008). Effect of foliar application of growth regulators on seed yield and yield component of soybean [Glacine max (L.) Merrill.]. Asian Journal of Biological Science. 3(1): 229-230
  6. Kashid, D.A., Doddamani, M.B., Chetti, M.B., Hiremath, S.M., Arvindkumar, B.N. (2010). Effect of growth retardants on morpho-physiological traits and yield in sunflower. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science. 23(2): 347-349.
  7. Kittur, C.N. and Guggari, A.K. (2017). Effect of sowing time and planting geometry on growth and yield of pigeonpea in northern dry zone (Zone 3) of Karnataka. Journal of Farm Sci. 30(3): 334-337.
  8. Mula, M.G., Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V. and Rathore, A. (2010).  Effect of spacing and irrigation on seed production of CMS- based pigeonpea hybrid. Green Farming. 1(3): 221-227.
  9. Nagaraj, R. and Murali, K. (2018). Effect of inter and intra row spacing on yield and economics of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 6(5): 2537-2539.
  10. Pramod, G., Pujari, B.T., Basavaraja, M.K., Mahantesh, V. and Gowda, V. (2010). Yield, yield parameters and economics of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] as influenced by genotypes, planting geometry and protective irrigation. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 6(2): 422- 425.
  11. Ramesh, R. and Ramprasad, E. (2013). Effect of Plant growth regulators on morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill.] Helix. 6: 441-447.
  12. Ramesh, K. and Thirumurugan, V. (2001). Effect of seed pelleting and foliar nutrition on growth of soybean. Madras Agriculture Journal. 88: 465-468.
  13. Reddy, P., Ninganur, B.T., Chetti, M.B. and Hiremath, S.M. (2009). Effect of growth retardants and nipping on chlorophyll content, nitrate reductase activity, seed protein content and yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Karnataka J. of Agric. Sci. 22(2): 289-292.
  14. Saritha, K.S., Pujari, B.T., Basavarajappa, R., Naik, M.K., Rameshbabu and Desai, B.K. (2012).  Effect of irrigation, nutrient and planting geometry on yield, yield attributes and economics of pigeon pea, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 25(1): 131-133.
  15. Sumathi, A., V. Babu Rajendra Prasad and Mallika Vanangamudi, (2016). Influence of plant growth regulators on yield and yield components in pigeonpea, Legume Research. LR- 3637 [1-7].
  16. Waghmare Y.M., Gokhale, D.N. and Chavan, A.S. (2016). Production potential of Pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by plant geometry and irrigation schedules. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 8(16):1287- 1289. ISSN: 0975-3710andE-ISSN: 0975-9107.

Global Footprints