Variability in phenotypic characters expressed by range, standard deviation and coefficient of variation reflected significant variation among the delineated genotypes (Table 2). The vine length ranged from 1.70 to 5.90 meter. The highest vine length of 5.90 meter was recorded by genotype CISH-DC-16 whereas minimum vine length of 1.70 meter was recorded with CISH-DC-18. Number of primary braches ranged 5.67 (CISH-DC-5) to 11.00 (CISH-DC-13) plant. Days taken for first flowering determine the harvest time which ranged from 65.00 (CISH-DC-1) to 225.00 days (CISH-DC-20) Number of flower/cluster ranged from 11.33 (CISH-DC-5) 28.00(CISH-DC-3). Fruit set percentage ranged from 39.24 to 94.74 %. Genotype CISH-DC-15 recorded maximum fruit set 94.74% whereas minimum fruit set (39.24%) was recorded by CISH-DC-20. Number of cluster/plant which directly associated with yield ranged from 20 (CISH -DC-2) to 70.3 (CISH-DC -11). Number of pods/cluster ranged from 6.67 (CISH-DC-3) to 19.67 (CISH-DC-13). Pod length ranged from 5.55 cm (CISH-DC-3) to 16.30 cm (CISH-DC-6). Pod weight, which is one of the most important trait for determining yield of crop ranged from 3.60 g (CISH-DC-20) to 11.22 g (CISH-DC-7). Number of seeds/pod varied from 2.97 (CISH-DC-18) to 5.97 (CISH-DC-16). Pod yield /plant ranged from 1.89 kg (CISH-DC-20) to 10.17 kg (CISH-DC-7). The genotypes having highest values for particular desirable traits may be selected as parents for future breeding aiming for genetic improvement programme of yield in dolichos. Similar observations have been reported by
Parmar et al., 2013 and
Peer et al., 2018 in the germplasm evaluation of Dolichos bean.
Coefficient of variation (%) reflected the high magnitude of variability among the evaluated phenotypic traits. Highest coefficient of variation was observed for pod yield /plant (g) (50.51%) followed by days taken to first flowering (44.39%), pod weight (33.01%) indicated an appreciable variability in delineated genotypes which is a prerequisite for crop improvement programme. The results are in accordance with findings of the
Ali et al., 2005.
Principal component analysis transforms a number of possible correlated variables into smaller number of uncorrelated variables by reducing the outliers. (Table 3) Eigen values with more than one has high explanatory power of original variables. Based on degree of divergence, 20 genotypes were grouped into five principal components having Eigen value > 1 accounted for 82.53% of total variability. The first principal component (PC-I) explained 29.44% of total variation and the traits which positively contributed towards the first component were pod yield /plant (0.497), pod weight (0.407) pod length (0.345) pod with (0.332) whereas primary branch /plant contributed negatively to this component. Numbers of flowers/cluster (0.518) and vine length (0.383) were found to be the main traits contributing towards PC-II which were responsible for 17.67 % of total variability. The traits positively contributing towards PC- III were number of seeds /plant (0.600) number of clusters/plant (0.514) which was responsible for 15.07 % of total variability. PC-IV accounted for 10.74 % of total variability positively contributed by percent fruit set (0.631), number of pods /cluster (0.354) whereas 9.61% of the total variability was positively contributed by PC V from primary branches/plant (0.666). The traits with largest absolute closer to unit within the first component influence the clustering more than those with lower absolute value closer to zero (
Chahal and Gosal, 2002). Thus the differentiation within the delineated genotypes in different principal component was because of high contribution of few characters rather than small contribution of each character. The bi-plot of PC-I and PC-II showed a considerable variability presenting a dispersion pattern of delineated genotypes (Fig 1). The genotypes having negative values for PC-I and PC-II had smaller pods with less number of seeds /pods, low pod weight and yield. The genotypes with maximum positive loadings for PC-I and negative for PC-II were characterised with high number of flowers/cluster, number of flower clusters/plant and number of pods/cluster. The characters which are positively contributing towards PC-I to PC-V are important because they explain more than 82.53% of total variability. The dataset revealed higher contribution from the traits
viz., pod yield /plant, pod weight, pod length, pod width, number of flower/cluster, vine length and primary branches/plant. The genotypes grouped in the separate clusters (Fig 2) as shown by dendrogram are to be considered important during the selection of parents for hybridization or direct selection. Similar findings were earlier reported by
Hadwani et al., 2018 in dolichos bean. The use of PCA to identify the most divergent genotypes in germplasm collection has also been reported
(Singh et al., 2017, Singh et al., 2020). The scatter plot generated through PCA illustrated the diverse genotypes located farther from the point of origin. Genotypes namely CISH-DC-12, CISH-DC-20, CISH-DC-3 and CISH-DC-11 were found most divergent for different traits (Fig 1). These diverse genotypes may be employed as parents in hybridisation in future breeding program in hybridization. Generally, it is customary to select one of the important variables from these identified groups for targeted improvement programme. Hence, PC I for pod yield/plant PC II for number of flower /clusters, PC III for number of seeds/pod, PC IV for maximum fruit set percentage and PC-V for number of primary branches /plant. The results demonstrated the usefulness of PCA in the identification of traits that contributed most variation within a group of genotypes. This technique has more practical utility in the selection of parental lines for breeding purposes.
Single linkage cluster analysis grouped all genotypes into three clusters by quantifying cluster means of all traits and their individual contribution (Table 4). The maximum number of genotypes were accommodated in cluster III (8) followed by cluster I (6) and cluster II (6) comprising 40, 30 and 30 % share of the total population, respectively. On the cluster mean basis, cluster I was important for days to first flowering (47.83) earliness and number of clusters /plant (54.44). Cluster II is important for the traits
viz., vine length (4.58), per cent fruit set (79.30), pod length (11.97), pod width (1.53) pod weight (7.58) and number of seeds /pod (5.14) whereas cluster III three was important for primary branches /plant (8.88), number of flowers/cluster (19.79), number of pods/cluster (14.96) and pod yield /plant (5.13). The genotypes of highest cluster mean of specific traits can be utilized as parents for realising targeted genetic improvement for specific traits restructuring of dolichos bean for a particular character.
Arya et al., (2017) also suggested that cluster having high mean values of specific traits may be used for hybridization programme to get superior recombinants.
Proximity matrix obtained suggests that the resolution for 20 genotypes of dolichos bean distributed in three clusters with a wide range of diversity for traits (Table 5). The highest inter cluster distance between clusters I and cluster II (136.237) followed by cluster-II and cluster-III (102.313) elucidated a high degree of divergence between the genotypes of these clusters. The hybrids developed from genotypes having maximum cluster distance resulted in high heterosis in yield and yield attributing traits (
Kujur et al., 2017). Thus, crosses between the genotypes of cluster-I and Cluster-II and Cluster-II and cluster-III may be used in dolichos breeding for achieving maximum heterosis and isolating useful recombinants in segregating generation as well as introgressing useful traits in commercial dolichos cultivar. These findings are in conformity with the observations of
Hadawani et al., 2018, Singh et al., 2017 and Birari and Ghanekar, 1992 that genotypes having placed farther in clusters resulted in a wide spectrum of variation when used in hybridization distance used in hybridization resulted in a wide spectrum of variation in segregants. The genotypes grouped in same cluster presumably diverge very little from each other and does not produce desired segregates when used as parents for hybridization
(Roy et al., 2013). Hence hybridization programme should be initiated with putative parents belonging to different characters. Therefore, parents with higher cluster distance are likely to be beneficial for further improvement in dolichos.
Dendogram obtained from single linkage cluster analysis by using the Euclidean distance depicted the clear relationship and exact position of genotype in clusters (Fig 2). ‘All the genotypes were distinct at 100 percent of dissimilarity and and formed three clusters at 65% of dissimilarity. Dissimilarity range 65 to 100% among the evaluated genotypes is enough to suggest the variability available in the dolichos bean genotypes. Distance among the genotype on the Euclidean scale reflected the position of genotype. CISH-DC-20, CISH-DC-3, CISH-DC-15, CISH-DC-5 and CISH-DC-2 were most divergent and potential for future breeding programmes in Dolichos bean and to isolate desirable recombinants for high pod yield. This study on genetic diversity assessment identified diverse genotypes in respect of pod yield that could be used as parental clones in hybridization and breeding programme in dolichos bean.