Endophytic bacterial diversity in pulses
We have isolated several endophytic bacteria from pulse crops more specifically from blackgram (
V. mungo) and greengram (
V. radiata). After careful screening, 15 promising endophytic isolates were selected for this study. Out of 15, eight bacterial endophytes were isolated from
V. mungo and they were designated as BG - E1 to BG - E8. Seven
V. radiata isolates were selected and named as GG - E1 to GG - E7. Based on the nucleotide sequence of the 16S rRNA gene, all the fifteen isolates were determined and aligned with reference strains in Gene Bank (Table 1). All the isolates showed high similarities (³ 98%) with their closest related species. The phylogenetic tree showing the relationships between the isolates and related reference species is depicted in Fig 1. The phylogenetic tree could discriminate against the endophytic bacterial isolates of pulses and be arranged into four different clusters:
Firmicutes,
α -Proteobacteria,
β-Proteobacteria and γ-Proteobacteria. The cluster
Firmicutes, which encompasses gram-positive bacteria with low G+C content, was the most predominant bacteria with low G+C content, was the most predominant group among the isolates, which consisted of the genus
Bacillus. Next to
Firmicutes, more number of isolates were found in the
γ-Proteobacteria cluster. It contains three members from
Enterobacter, two members from
Pseudomonas and one isolate from
Pantoea. Two members in the cluster
β-
Proteobacteria belonged to the genus
Achromobacter and one isolate,
Ochrobacterium from α-
Proteobacteria was also found.
The results showed the predominant existence and wide distribution of
Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter in the pulses. Bacteria belonging to the genera
Bacillus and
Pseudomonas are easy to culture and cultivation-dependent studies have identified them as frequently occurring endophytes
(Seghers et al., 2004). Several reports concerning the presence of bacteria belonging to
Bacillus and
Pseudomonas genera inside the various parts of plants as endophytic bacteria exist already (
Vendan et al., 2010; Etminani and Harighi, 2018). The previous studies include
Bacillus,
Pseudomonas and
Enterobacter isolated from many different plant species, suggesting that these bacteria have developed an evolutionary niche within plants.
Plant growth-promoting traits of endophytes
The ability to fix N
2, in other words, the presence of nitrogenase enzyme, is only limited to certain bacteria and archaea. The endophytic bacteria assimilate atmospheric nitrogen and convert it into ammonia, transferring this molecule to the plant metabolism
(Gaiero et al., 2013). The N
2-fixing ability of bacterial endophytes was screened in this study by acetylene reduction assay (Table 2). All the fifteen isolates showed nitrogen-fixing activity, however, the isolate BG- E6 (
Bacillus pumilus) recorded higher acetylene reduction activity of 29.4 nmoles C
2H
4 mg protein
-1 hr
-1 followed by GG- E2 (
Pseudomonas chlororaphis) with 27.2 nmoles C2H4 mg protein
-1 hr
-1. Our results were in line with the earlier study, in which
Yan et al., (2018) reported the nitrogenase activities of five endophytic nitrogen-fixing isolates determined by acetylene reduction assay, ranging from 28.5 to 38.0 nmol C2H4mg protein
-1 hr
-1.
Phytohormones are versatile low molecular weight natural signaling molecules that act even at micromolar concentration and regulate all physiological and developmental processes of plants. The best-known phytohormones that are produced by endophytic microbiota are IAA, which is synthesized via the indole-3-pyruvate (IPyA) pathway
(Singh et al., 2017). The capacity to synthesize IAA is widespread among soil and plant-associated bacteria. In this study, the endophytic bacterial isolates were found to produce IAA in the amount ranging from 0.74 to 3.12 μg/mL (Table 2). Maximum IAA production was detected in isolate BG-E6 and minimum by the isolate GG- E5. Previous reports indicated that many endophytic bacteria including,
Pseudomonas,
Serratia and
Bacillus can synthesize IAA
(Bhutani et al., 2018: Liu et al., 2010). Similarly,
Pandya et al., (2015) reported the highest IAA production of 10.80 µg/mL by endophytic bacteria isolated from
V. radiata.
The solubilization of insoluble P and making it available to plants are yet other important traits of endophytes
(Oteino et al., 2015). In our study, we examined all the selected endophytic bacterial isolates for their phosphate solubilizing ability by detecting extracellular solubilization of precipitated tricalcium phosphate. Out of 15 isolates, only 11 endophytic isolates showed notable phosphate solubilization activity (Table 2). Based on the solubilization zone, the isolate BG- E6 (
Bacillus pumilus) recorded higher solubilization of mineral phosphate (0.61mm) followed by GG- E2 (
Pseudomonas chlororaphis) with a solubilization zone of 0.58mm. The endophytes release organic acids like 2-ketogluconic acid, gluconic acid
(Oteino et al., 2015) and others that lower the pH and ultimately solubilize the insoluble phosphate. Several researchers reported that endophytic bacterial species
viz.,
Bacillus and
Pseudomonas have shown the potential to solubilize the insoluble phosphate
(Grover et al., 2011; Naveed et al., 2014).
Bacterial endophytes are also known to liberate iron-chelating molecules (siderophores), which increase the accessibility of iron to the plants in iron-limiting conditions (
Szilagyi-Zecchin et al., 2014). In our study, out of 15 isolates, only 9 isolates produced siderophore, as evidenced by the change of color in the CAS blue medium from bluish-green to orange (Table 2). This is in line with the work of
Liaqat and Eltem (2016) who reported the production of siderophore by only 2 out of 7 endophytic bacteria isolated from the peach rootstock.
Biocontrol is a mechanism, wherein microorganisms are used to promote the growth of plants indirectly by inhibiting the growth of pathogens. In the present study, only 4 endophytic isolates (BG - E3, BG - E6, GG - E2 and GG - E7) showed antifungal activity against all the four test organisms
viz.,
Rhizoctonia solani, Cercospora canescens, Macrophomina phaseolina and Uromyces phaseoli (Table 3)
. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria can antagonize soil-borne pathogens through various mechanisms such as competition, antibiosis and/or parasitism (
Le Cocq et al., 2016). The ability of endophytic bacteria colonizing internal plant tissues to protect host plants from soil-borne pathogens was well-reviewed by
Eljounaidi et al., (2016).
The hierarchical clustering analysis of PGP traits of endophytic isolates revealed three major clusters. Cluster I consists of seven endophytic isolates
viz., BG-E1, BG-E2, BG-E7, BG-E5, GG-E6, GG-E3, GG-E4 with a moderate level of PGP traits; cluster II with BG-E3, BG-E7, BG-E6, BG-E2, BG-E4, GG-E1 with high PGP traits; cluster III with BG-E8 and GG-E5 with least PGP activities (Fig 2). The trait-based clustering also had three groups
viz., group-A with ARA, siderophore and
Rhizoctonia antagonism; group-B with IAA, P solubilization and
Cercospora antagonism; group-C with antagonism against
Macrophomina and
Uromyces. Based on the double clustering method, the best endophytic strains
viz., BG-E3, BG-E5, BG-E6, GG-E2, GG-E7 were selected for pot culture experiments.
Endophytic bacterial inoculation on growth of blackgram and greengram
The results of the pot culture experiment revealed that the inoculation of endophytic bacteria increased the growth and yield parameters of blackgram when compared to uninoculated control (Table 4). Among the five selected cultures, BG - E6 (
Bacillus pumilus) registered higher yield attributes
viz., root length, shoot length, nodule number, nodule dry weight, plant fresh weight, plant dry weight and yield than other treatments. The above treatment recorded a higher grain yield of 3.04 g/plant, which was a 14.7 percent increased yield over uninoculated control. Similarly, in greengram, the isolate GG- E2 (
Pseudomonas chlororaphis) recorded higher yield attributes and yield than other treatments. It registered a higher grain yield of 2.32 g/plant, which was a 19.5 percent increased yield over control. The endophytes can promote legume growth and yield due to their specific beneficial traits
(Naveed et al., 2017). When applied as a microbial inoculant, the endophyte has been found to promote plant growth via different mechanisms such as hormone production, P solubilization, siderophores and production of organic acids
(Khalifa et al., 2016). In this present study also, the above isolates showed their potential in all the plant growth-promoting traits studied, which eventually resulted in the higher growth and yield of pulses.
The observation plot showing the positions of PGPR strains as treatments and loading plot presenting the growth and yield variables of blackgram and greengram explained by the first two components (PC1 and PC2) are presented as Fig 3. The PC1 showed 54.6% variability and PC2 adds 41.5% variability to the total cumulative variability (96.13%). All the five endophytic strains had differences in their performance and were positioned in a different quadrant of the plot. The BG-E5 and BG-E6 were positioned in both PCs positive quadrant (top left-hand quadrant); while, BG-E2, GG-E7 and GG-E2 positioned in PC1 positive and PC2 negative quadrant (bottom left-hand quadrant). The control was positioned in the PC1 and PC2 negative quadrant (Fig 3A). In the loading plot, all the variables of blackgram positioned the quadrant where orthogonally similar to scoring plot PGPR strains (BG-E6 and BG-E5). Likewise, all traits of greengram were orthogonally positioned with BG-E6, GG-E7 and GG-E2. The nodule number (11.4%), nodule weight (10.6%), grain yield (8.5%) of blackgram and greengram contribute to PC1 and root length, shoot length and biomass contribute equal and significant contribution (10-13%) to PC2.
Host specificity of endophytic bacteria
The experimental results revealed that the inoculation of endophytic bacteria isolated from blackgram (BG - E5, BG - E6 and BG - E3) recorded higher growth and yield parameters in the same host (blackgram), with poor response in greengram
. Similarly, the endophytes isolated from greengram (GG-E2 and GG - E7) have less bio-efficacy influence with blackgram. Hence, it clearly showed that there was a host specificity found among the endophytic bacterial cultures like rhizobia. Plant genotype is an important determinant in the development of positive plant-endophyte association
(Afzal et al., 2019). The central role of phytohormone signaling in plant-endophyte interactions suggests that once recruited by a particular host, endophytes undergo host-specific adaptations; the upshot is a highly specialized, finely tuned mutualism. Such mutualisms may make plants better able to tolerate the endophyte and the endophyte in turn more responsive to the plant’s metabolism (
Schulz and Boyle, 2005). The plant growth-promoting ability of endophytic bacteria can be influenced by the genotype of the plant host.
Kim et al., (2012) reported that the growth promotion of switchgrass by
Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN is plant genotype-dependent. The findings of
Long et al., (2008) were in agreement with this study, wherein they observed that plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria of
Solanum nigrum were highly host-specific, where these bacteria were unable to produce growth enhancement in
Nicotiana attenuata, a non-host plant.
Similarly,
Dastogeer et al., (2018) observed an obvious clustering of endophytic communities associated with different
Nicotiana species and they implied that endophyte community structure can be highly influenced by host genotypes. They revealed that plant growth-promoting effects of natural endophytic bacteria on their host and non-host plant species are not the same. In our study also, the endophytes showed more pronounced plant growth-promoting effects with the host crop than in non-host crops. Besides, endophytes may have evolved from parasites and may still have parasitic tendencies
(Kogel et al., 2006) potentially contributing to incompatible interactions with non-hosts. Due to these incompatible interactions, the endophytes may elicit inappropriate responses in a non-host plant which ultimately resulted in lower growth and yield. These findings demonstrate that endophytic bacteria were host specific and if they inoculated with non-host plants, despite their plant growth-promoting properties, they displayed inappropriate response and poor yield.