Growth parameters
There was increase in plant height with advancement of growth period (Table 1). Among varieties, V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) recorded maximum plant height (58.31 cm) followed by V
4 (Kashi Shyamal), V
2 (Kashi Unnati) and V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). The difference in plant height in different varieties of cowpea may be due to their genetic makeup.
Bahadur et al., (2008) and
Ramana et al., (2010) bean also reported significant influence of varieties on plant height. Nutrient level N
5 has registered maximum plant height (55.54 cm) followed by N
4. The minimum plant height (47.56 cm) was observed in case of nutrient level N
1.
Hasan et al., (2010) and
Jadhav et al., (2011) also obtained similar results in plant height due to increasing N fertilizer in cowpea.
The number of leaves and leaf area per plant was influenced significantly due to different treatments of varieties and nutrient levels (Table 1). Among the varieties, maximum number of leaves per plant (38.46) and leaf area per plant (2440.09 cm
2) was observed in variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal), followed by variety V
4 (Kashi Shyamal) and V
2 (Kashi Unnati). Minimum number of leaves per plant (31.19) and leaf area per plant (2034.59 cm
2) was observed with variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). The plants of various varieties responded differently to environmental factors based on their genetic makeup and their adaption capability. These findings are in agreement with the finding of
Alhaji (2008) and
Agbogidi and Egho (2012). Significantly highest number of leaves (38.30) and leaf area per plant (2452.48 cm
2) were reported under nutrient level N
5 followed by N
4 (Table 1). Lower number of leaves (31.69) and leaf area per plant (1991.89 cm
2) were reported under nutrient level N
1. The additional supply of nitrogen by nitrogen fixing bacteria appeared to have increased the number of leaves and thereby, greater supply of food materials through increased photosynthesis, which ultimately gave significant increase in yield parameters
(Jadhav et al., 2011). These findings are in agreement with finding of
Abdelhamid et al., (2011).
More branching (10.00) in cowpea were observed by variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) followed by V
4. Cultivar V
3 (Kashi Kanchan) recorded minimum number of branches per plant (8.01). These findings corroborates with those of
Imran et al., (2012) and
Babaji et al., (2011). Nutrient levels had exerted significant effect on number of branches per plant during all the growth stages. Highest number of branches per plant (10.58) was observed with nutrient level N
5. These findings are in agreement with
Satodiya et al., (2015) and
Hasan et al., (2010).
Average fresh and dry weight of plant was significantly affected with varieties and nutrient levels (Table 1). Maximum fresh weight (117.23 g) and dry weight of plant (32.02 g) was recorded in variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) followed by variety V
4 (Kashi Shyamal). Variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan) has registered minimum fresh weight (98.24 g) and dry weight of plant (26.21 g). Higher plant height, number of leaves and number of branches might have resulted in more photosynthesis and accumulation of food material in variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) resulting in higher fresh weight and dry weight. Similar findings have been reported by
Ramana et al., (2010). Nutrient levels indicated significant effect on fresh weight and dry weight of plant. Maximum fresh weight (118.80 g) and dry weight of plant (32.98 g) was observed with nutrient level N
5 at all the growth stages, followed by N
4, N
3 and N
2 in descending order. Minimum fresh weight and dry weight of plant was found under N
1 at all the stages of crop growth. These results are in conformity with the findings of
Kumar et al., (2009).
Yield parameters and yield
Variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) recorded maximum number of pods per plant (Table 2)
i.e. 20.59 followed by varieties V
4 (Kashi Shyamal) and V
2 (Kashi Unnati). Minimum number of pods per plant (15.73) observed with variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). Similar results have been reported by
Imran et al., (2012) and Kwaga (2014). Nutrient levels exhibited significant effect on number of pods per plant in cowpea. Maximum number of pods per plant (20.69) was found with application of nutrient level N
5. It was followed by N
4, N
3 and N
2 in descending order. Minimum number of pods per plant (15.93) was observed with application of nutrient level N
1. This might be due to optimum supply of N in alleviating nutritional deficiency in plants particularly at reproductive phase which resulted in producing more number of pods per plant. These findings are in close conformity with
Patel and Jadav (2010) and
Khandelwal et al., (2012).
Variety V
2 (Kashi Unnati) had longest pod (35.39 cm) followed by V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) and V
4 (Kashi Shyamal). Minimum pod length (30.21 cm) was found in case of variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). These findings are in accordance with
Babaji et al., (2011) and
Imran et al., (2012). Nutrient level N
5 was registered maximum value of pod length (35.48 cm) followed by N
4. Lowest value of pod length (30.63 cm) was observed in case of nutrient level N
1. Nutrient level N
1 might have not provided sufficient nitrogen that reduced the pod length in cowpea. Similar results have also been reported by
Satodiya et al., (2015).
Maximum value for number of seeds (12.81) per pod (Table 2) was observed with variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal). It was followed by varieties V
4 (Kashi Shyamal) and V
2 (Kashi Unnati). Minimum value for number of seeds per pod (10.05) was recorded with variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). The results are agreement with
Imran et al., (2012) and
Jakusko et al., (2013). Application of nutrient levels caused significant influence on number of seeds per pod (Table 2). Higher levels of nutrient resulted increase in number of seeds per pod. Maximum number of seeds per pod (13.62) was taken with application of nutrient level N
5 which was significantly higher over other nutrient levels. It was followed by N
4, N
3 and N
2 in descending order. Minimum number of seeds per pod (9.23) was recorded under nutrient level N
1. The increased supply of nitrogen and its higher uptake by plant might have stimulated the rate of various physiological processes in plant and led to increase growth and yield
(Khandelwal et al., 2012). Similar results have been reported by
Patel and Jadav (2010),
Jadhav et al., (2011) and
Salehin and Rahman (2012).
Among varieties, V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) was recorded maximum seed yield per plant (12.50 g) and seed yield per hectare (18.48 q), followed by V
4 (Kashi Shyamal) and V
2 (Kashi Unnati). The lowest seed yield per plant (10.25 g) and seed yield per hectare (15.12 q) were observed with variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). These results are in agreement with the observation of
Alhaji (2008) and
Kwaga (2014). Nutrient levels exerted significant influence on seed yield per plant (g) and seed yield per hectare (q). Highest seed yield per plant (12.76 g) and seed yield per hectare (18.90 q) were taken under the nutrient level N
5 followed by N
4. Nutrient level N
5 recorded 32.07% higher yield over N
1. Minimum seed yield per plant (9.66 g) and seed yield per hectare (14.31 q) were observed in case of nutrient level N
1. Higher photosynthetic area, more dry matter accumulation might have resulted in seed yield per plant and seed yield per hectare in variety V
1 (Pusa Sukomal). Similar results have been reported by
Abayomi et al., (2008), Patel and Jadav (2010) and
Jadhav et al., (2011).
Among the varieties, V
1 (Pusa Sukomal) was found maximum harvest index (44.58%) (Table 2), followed by V
4 (Kashi Shyamal) and V
2 (Kashi Unnati). Minimum harvest index (39.22%) was recorded with variety V
3 (Kashi Kanchan). Similar results have been reported by
Uma and Salimath (2006). Nutrient levels exhibited significant effect on harvest index in cowpea. Maximum harvest index (44.96%) was found with application of nutrient level N
5. Minimum harvest index (39.11%) was observed with application of nutrient level N
1. These findings are in agreement with the results obtained by
Kumar et al., (2009) and
Abdelhamid et al., (2011).