Morphological Characterization
Analysis of data of thirty-one genotypes on the basis of 24 visual characters and various categorical descriptors revealed the occurrence of 62 numbers of variants. Eighteen variants (erect plant growth, purple stem colour, absent in leaflet lobes, deltoid leaf shape, lanceolate leaf shape, cuneate leaf shape, green leaf colour, green leaf vein colour, purple leaf vein colour, green petiole colour, purple petiole colour, large leaf size, yellow flower colour of petiole colour, absent pod pubescence, medium and long plant height, long pod length of the mature pod, large seed size) out of possible 62 variants could not be observed in any of the genotypes. Only one limited number of categorical descriptors (yellow seed colour) that have contributed to the distinctiveness of specific mungbean genotypes had been observed. Yield assessment was analyzed for each mungbean genotypes under field conditions and calculated the yield (kg/ha) given in the (Table 4). Majority of genotypes showed good yield
viz. ‘OBGG-52’ (870kg/ha), ‘Kamadev’ (830kg/ha), ‘KalahandiLocal-1’ (846kg/ha), ‘BerhempurLocal-1’ (920kg/ha), ‘Banpur Local’ (952kg/ha), ‘IPM-02-03’ (895kg/ha) and while rest of the genotypes showed low yield
viz. ‘DigapahandiLocal’ (275kg/ha), ‘Sambalpur Local’ (290kg/ha), ‘Nadika Local’ (220kg/ha), ‘NayagarhLocal-6’(380kg/ha).
Cluster Analysis based on Morphology
The genetic dissimilarity matrix was analysed using UPGMA clustering algorithms for the construction of dendrogram that depicted the pattern of genetic relationships among mungbean genotypes (Table 3). The analysis revealed four main clusters at 8.75 dissimilarity coefficients with best possible discrimination between groups. The genotype pairs ‘Badahana Local’ and ‘Hinjili Local’ showed the maximum dis-similarity (2.67) followed by dis-similarity between ‘OBGG-52’ and ‘Berhampur Local 1’ among the thirty-one genotypes (Table 2), whereas, ‘Nayagarh Local’ and ‘Nayagarh Local 6’ showed lowest dis-similarity (0.01) followed by dis-similarity between ‘Kukudakhandi Local’ and ‘Banpur Local’(0.20). Fourteen genotypes
viz., ‘Banpur Local’, ‘Kukudakhandi Local’, ‘PuriLocal- 4’, ‘Kalahandi Local 1’, ‘Kalahandi Local 1’, ‘Balangir Local’, ‘Nadika Local’, ‘NayagarhLocal-6’, ‘Nayagarh Local’, ‘Bhapur Local’, ‘Bolangiri local-1’, ‘Bhapur Black Local’, ‘Kamdev’ and ‘KVK Puri-2’ were included in Cluster I. But cluster-II was represented by only one genotype (Sambalpur Local 2'. Ten genotypes
viz., ‘Nuagaon Brown Local’, ‘Kaniapada Local’, ‘SundergarhLocal 11-1’, ‘IPM-02-14’, ‘Behrampur Local 2’ , ‘KantapadaLocal’, ‘Berhampur Local 1’, ‘IPM-02-3’, ‘Kendrapada Local 1’ and ‘Purushottamapur Local’ were represented in the Cluster III and cluster IV had six genotypes
viz., ‘Badahana Local’, ‘Andapur Local’, ‘Hinjili Local’, ‘Seragada Local’, ‘OBGG-52’ and ‘Digapahandi Local’.
At 8.07 dis-similarity coefficient, Cluster-I was further sub-divided into two sub-clusters. The sub-cluster I A was represented by two genotypes
viz., ‘Kamdev’ and ‘KVK Puri-2’. whereas Cluster IB had 12 genotypes
viz., ‘Banpur Local’, ‘Kukudakhandi Local’, ‘PuriLocal-4’, ‘Kalahandi Local 1’, ‘Kalahandi Local 1’, ‘Balangir Local’, ‘Nadika Local’, ‘NayagarhLocal-6’, ‘Nayagarh Local’, ‘Bhapur Local’, ‘Bolangiri local -1’ and ‘Bhapur Black Local’.
Variability for disease reaction
Based on disease scale (0-5) given by Reddy
et al., 1994, observations were carried out mainly on the basis of weekly intervals and disease incidence was recorded from the field given in the Plate 2 and 3. Majority of genotypes (22.58%) showed highly resistant for powdery mildew and 16.13% were resistant to powdery mildew. In comparison, 19.35% of genotypes exhibited were highly susceptible, with moderate resistant and susceptible. Among all genotypes, 3.23% of genotypes were exhibited susceptible to powdery mildew.
Molecular Characterisation
The study was aimed to validate the powdery mildew associated marker (Table 4) among mungbean genotypes. Seven primers of specific microsatellite loci were used to amplify the repeated regions in the mungbean samples. For all loci, 25µl reaction mixture containing genomic DNA concentration of 25-50 ng, primer concentration of 1 pM and MgCl2 concentration of 1.5mM, dNTPs 2.5mM, 10X buffer and 1 unit of Taq polymerase were given. In the present study primers were found to be polymorphic. These polymorphic loci amplified were in the mungbean genotypes given in the Fig 2 approximately of size
viz. VrCSSTS1 (300bp), VrCSSTS2 (300bp), VrCSSSR3 (200-300bp), MB-SSR238 (200-300bp), CEDG191 (100-150bp), CEDG166 (220-300bp) and CEDG282(100bp) which are associated with powdery mildew disease recorded during field evaluation.
Relationship Between Genetic and Phenotyping Profiling
The results of this study support the existence of a relationship between genetic and phenotypic character among the mungbean varieties. This finding is of specific interest in diversity analysis and disease variability reaction with validation of microsatellites marker for mildew resistant make inferences about the genetics and phenotypic correlations among the genotypes. The phenotypic profiling (Table 1) showing that some genotypes are superior as compared to other and the disease variability reaction also showed that these superior genotypes are showing highly resistant, resistant and moderately resistant with better yield. From the molecular profiling analysis (Table 6) of microsatellites marker also revealing similar result and validating that these markers are linked to the powdery mildew disease.
On the basis of seed yield per plant, number of pods per plant, number of branches per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight some varieties are considered as superior genotypes for the further breeding program which has shown similar results with
Gokulakrishnan et al., 2012.;
Behera et al., 2020.Thirty-one genotypes of mungbean were screened under field conditions and the incidence of disease was present in almost all the genotypes from 35 DAS to 55 DAS (Days After Sowing). Among them, six genotypes showed a moderately resistant and moderately susceptible reaction; five genotypes showed resistance reaction, seven genotypes showed highly resistance reaction, six genotypes showed highly susceptible reaction and only one showed a susceptible reaction. These results are in line with Khare and Lankpale (1998) who carried out mungbean trials during Rabi season over three years against powdery mildew and only seven entries were found to be resistant to powdery mildew over the years. A previous study by Thakur and Agarwal (1995) suggested that environmental factors have a large impact on the extent and severity of powdery mildew. They reported a high incidence of powdery mildew during Kharif than Rabi
(Mishra et al., 2019). In the present study, high incidence of powdery mildew on mungbean varieties was observed during Kharif season under field condition. This indicated that powdery mildew development is largely depended on favourable environmental condition and cool, dry season favours their development andinfection.
Among the different DNA markers, microsatellite or Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) are the marker of choice for various genetic studies because, which detect sequence variation in the hyper-variable region of tandem repeats of 2-4bp, are a powerful tool for genome analysis because of their co-dominant nature, loci specificity and high reproducibility (Tautz and Renz, 1984). Microsatellite markers have been used for genome mapping and genetic diversity studies in many crop plants (Ford
et al., 2002; Blair
et al., 2006;
Sangiri et al., 2007; Gupta
et al., 2013; Singh
et al., 2014 ;
Behera et al., 2020). In addition to being able to be readily assayed, they are highly informative, transferable, widely distributed in most plant species and highly polymorphic between genotypes. The present molecular data are showing amplification of VrCSSSR3 at 200-300 bp regions, VrCSSTS1 and VrCSSTS2 at 300bp region, which is in congruent with the result reported by
Zhang et al., (2008) who developed new SSR and STS markers co-segregated with RFLP marker VrCS65 by BAC cloning. In his study, SSR marker VrCSSR1 and one STS marker VrCSSTS1 which were reported as co-segregating with RFLP marker VrCS65 are found to be associated with PM resistance. These markers explained about 16.02% and 20.18% of total phenotypic variance respectively. CEDG191amplified at100-150bp region, CEDG166 amplified at 220-300bp region andCEDG282 at100bp region are considering associated with powdery mildew disease recorded during field evaluation. Multiple-interval mapping by
Chankaew et al., (2013) also shows the similar types of result with little divergence. He reported that two markers from LG 6 (CEDG121 and CEDG169) were associated with qPMRUM2 locus and two markers from LG9 (VRSSR010 and DMBSSR130) were associated with qPMV4718-3 locus and he reported that Z test indicated that marker DMBSSR130 and CEDG121 showed significant association with powdery mildew resistance. The MB-SSR238 marker exhibits amplification band within 200-300 bp regions showing the association with powdery mildew. The composite-interval mapping by
Kasettranan et al., (2010) reported two QTLs on two linkage groups, qPMR-1 and qPMR-2 which accounted for 20.10% and 57.81% of the total variation for plant response to powdery mildew disease. In this study, marker MB-SSR238, which was reported to be very closely linked to qPMR-2 locus and marker CEDG191, which was reported to be very closely linked to qPMR-1 were also used.