A total 24 pigeonpea genotypes were screened for their resistance against leaf blight consecutively for three years from 2015-2018 under field condition. Among these, four genotypes
viz., BDN 2, IPA 8F, IPA 15F and MA 6 were found to be resistant to leaf blight in all the three years of evaluation with the mean disease grade of 2.1, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.4 respectively. Nine genotypes
viz., CRG 9701, ICP 7119, ICP 2376, KPL 43, KPL 44, MAL 43, WRGE 65, WRP-1 and ICP 8863 showed moderately resistant reaction with the mean disease grade ranged from 3.2-4.2. The varieties
viz., CO5 and CO6 used in this study also showed moderately resistant to the disease with the mean grade of 4.2 and 3.6 respectively. Remaining 11 genotypes
viz., BRG 1, BRG 2, BSMR 853,BSMR 736, RVSA 07-31, RVSA 07-29, RVSA 07-10, BRG 3, BRG 4, JKM 189 and MAL 13 exhibited susceptible reaction to leaf blight (Table 1 and 2). Several workers previously evaluated the pigoenpea genotypes for leaf blight resistance and identified resistant sources.
Kumar and Rani (2010) screened 96 genotypes of pigeonpea in field under artificially inoculated conditions against leaf blight and found that genotypes
viz., RAUP-32, RAUP-34 and Pusa-(B)-35 were resistant, 12 were moderately resistant to the leaf blight. The pigeonpea genotypes, MA-128-1, MA-128-2 and DA-2 were found to be resistant to
Alternaria blight under natural field condition (
Venkateswarlu, 1981). These entries were also reported to be resistant under artificially inoculated condition in green house (
Kannaiyyan and Nene, 1986.). Out of 106 genotypes, seven genotypes
viz. Path 402, Path 407, NDA14-4, NDA14-15, NDA-14-16, NDA-14-29 and NDA-14-36 were found resistant, 33 genotypes were moderately resistant, 53 genotypes were moderately susceptible and 13 genotypes were susceptible to
Alternaria blight (
Rathore et al., 2018).
Field experiments were conducted consecutively for three years from 2015-16 to 2017-18 to evaluate the efficacy of micro nutrients and the combination fungicide
viz., carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% on leaf blight incidence. The foliar spraying of micronutrients
viz., ZnSO
4, MnSO
4, FeSO
4 CuSO
4 and Borax @ 0.2 per cent and Na Mo
3 @ 0.1 percent on 30 DAS followed by spraying of carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 1g / lit on 45 DAS was found to be promising in reducing the leaf blight incidence. Among these, foliar spraying of MnSO 4 @0.2 % on 30 DAS + carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 1g / lit on 45 DAS recorded the lowest leaf blight incidence (8.1 PDI) and with the highest disease reduction of 76.9% (Table 3). Manganese has been reported to control the diseases
viz., blast and
Alternaria leaf spot in rice (
Simoglou and Dordas, 2006), soybean leaf spot and rust in cereals (
Thompson and Huber, 2007). Manganese inhibits the induction of amino peptidase, an enzyme which supplies essential amino acids for fungal growth and pectin methyl esterase, a fungal enzyme that degrades host cell walls. It controls lignin and suberin (lipophilic macromolecule found in plant cell which prevents the fungal invasion) biosynthesis (
Vidhyasekaran, 1997) through activation of several enzymes of the shikimic acid and phenylpropanoid pathways (
Marschner, 1995). The micronutrient
viz., Mn has an important role in photosynthesis and phenol biosynthesis and several other functions (
Dordas, 2008). The efficacy of carbendazim + mancozeb against
Alternaria leaf blight has been proved by
Venkatramanamma et al., (2014).
Foliar spraying of ZnSO
4 @ 0.2 % + carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63 %@ 1g / lit ranked next in reducing the leaf spot incidence by recording 9.8 PDI with 72.0 per cent disease reduction. In the control plot leaf spot incidence of 35 PDI was registered. Zinc nutrition plays a pivotal function in plant immune responses
(Shirasu et al., 1999) and decreased the plant disease symptoms
(Grewal et al., 1996; Li et al., 2016; Machado et al., 2018). Plant nutrients inhibit the disease development by changing the plant physiology or by affecting pathogen or both of them. Plant pathogen dynamics in response to nutrient availability are thought to be more complicated as nutrient deficiency/sufficiency in plant system modulate host physiological system and plant reacts differentially (susceptible or tolerance) against different pathogens. However, some nutrient elements have a direct and greater impact on plant diseases than others (
Graham and Webb, 1991).
Foliar spraying of MnSO 4 @0.2% on 30 DAS + carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% @ 1g / lit on 45 DAS registered the highest grain yield of 905 kg/ha as against 703 kg/ha in the control (Table 3). Application of MnSo
4 at 2.5 kg ha
-1 increased the yield in soybean
(Tomar et al., 1991). The micro nutrients
viz., Mn, Zn, B and Mb are important for increasing the productivity of soybean (
Devarajan and Palaniappan, 1995). It was followed by ZnSO 4 @ 0.2 % on 30 DAS + carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% on 45 DAS which recorded the grain yield of 885 kg/ha. This was in concordance with findings of
Yashona et al., (2018) who found that foliar application Zn enhances the growth and yield attributes of pigeonpea.