The details of parental particulars were presented in Table 1. Among eight crosses
viz., MDU 1 × Mash 114, CO 5 × Mash 114, MDU 1 × VBN 6 and CO 5 × VBN 6 were resistant to MYMV disease, while other four crosses were found to be susceptible. The parents MDU 1 and CO 5 were used as common female parents for all the crosses. The appearance of both resistance and susceptibility in the F1s partly agreed with previous findings. Dominant nature of MYMV disease resistance was reported by
Dahiya et al., (1977), Verma and Singh (1986),
Kaushal and Singh (1988) and
Murugan and Nadarajan (2012). While the recessive nature of MYMV disease resistance was reported by
Singh (1980),
Dwivedi and Singh (1985) and
Verma and Singh (1986). The appearance of the various phenotypic expression of MYMV disease incidence among the F
1s clearly showed the contradiction on the inheritance pattern.
The inheritance patterns of MYMV disease resistance in F
2 generation of cross combinations were studied and the results are presented in Table 2. The results of the crosses
viz., MDU 1 × Mash 114, CO 5 × Mash 114, MDU 1 × VBN 6 and CO 5 × VBN 6 indicated goodness of fit for trigenic inhibitory gene action for MYMV disease. These crosses had the common male parents
viz., Mash 114 and VBN 6. The trigenic inheritance pattern indicated the presence of a third gene that influences the masking effect of phenotypic expression. Trigenic inhibitory gene action was reported by several workers in blackgram
(Solanki et al., 1982; Verma and Singh, 1986;
Reddy and Singh, 1995 and
Murugan and Nadarajan, 2012). The results of crosses viz., MDU 1 x Mash 1008, CO 5 × Mash 1008, MDU 1 × VBN 8 and CO 5 × VBN 8 indicated goodness of fit for digenic complementary gene action for MYMV disease. These crosses had the male parents
viz., Mash 1008 and VBN 8. A similar type of digenic interaction for MYMV resistance in black gram was reported by
Verma and Singh (1980);
Sandhu et al., (1985); Shukla and Pandiya (1985) and
Thamodhran et al., (2015). The differential expression of the inheritance pattern showed that the variation might be due the alleic pattern of parents. The digenic nature of inheritance of MYMV disease can be explained only if the third gene is recessive in both parents of a cross. Based on these findings, putative gene symbols for each parent were worked out (Table 3). The female parents MDU1 and CO 5 had similar allelic pattern (S
1S
1S
2S
2ii), which act in complementation. Male parents Mash 114 and VBN 6 had similar allelic pattern (s
1s
1s
2s
2ii), in which third gene was responsible for the inhibitory gene action. Hence, the appearance of resistant phenotype in the F
1 (S
1s
1S
2s
2ii) might be due the influence of the inhibitory gene in the third locus. The male parents Mash 1008 and VBN 8 had similar allelic form (s
1s
1s
2s
2ii), and showed the complimentary gene interaction in the crosses. Hence the F
1 (S
1s
1S
2s
2ii) obtained from the cross combination involving male parents Mash 1008 and VBN 8 had susceptible reaction.
Based on the foregoing discussion, it may be concluded that the MYMV disease resistance is governed by recessive genes in these eight crosses of blackgram. The presence of three genes is confirmed with the various types of interaction obtained in the study. However, the gene symbols allotted are subject to confirmation by allelic tests. The allelic tests may be conducted by intercrossing all the four male parents and studied the resistant pattern for MYMV disease incidence. Hence, recombination breeding with two or three cycles of recurrent selection may be a viable option to harness the MYMV disease resistance in these two susceptible female parents of blackgram.