Significant genetic variation was observed for almost all the quantitative traits among the given 40 genotypes of chickpea under late sown conditions (Table 1). Higher value of phenotypic variance than genotypic variance for the given traits was recorded. The genetic constants for the characters revealed that the magnitude of phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) was higher than the corresponding genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the traits denoting environmental factors influencing their expression to some degree or other (Table 2). Highest PCV was recorded by number of pods plant
-1 (26.705%) followed by 100-seed weight (23.95%) and number of seeds pod
-1 (19.46%) given in Table 2. Highest GCV (23.59%) value was noted for 100-seed weight followed by number of pods plant
-1 (22.94%) and plant height from ground to first pod (18.07%). While the lowest GCV and PCV (7.44 and 7.46%) were noted for days to maturity. Similarly a good deal of genetic variability for different yield and yield traits was reported by various scientists
(Jeena et al., 2005; Ali et al., 2011; Jha et al., 2015; Gul et al., 2013). Wide differences between PCV and GCV implied their susceptibility to environmental fluctuation, whereas narrow differences between PCV and GCV suggested their relative resistance to environmental alterations. The estimate of GCV and PCV alone is not much helpful in determining the heritable portion. The amount of advance to be expected from selection can be achieved by estimating heritability along with coefficient of variability.
Burton (1952) also suggested that GCV and heritability estimates would gave better information about the efficiency of selection. The heritability in broad sense was observed to be medium to high 45.84 to 99.52 per cent for all the traits which had significant differences among the accessions. Highest broad sense heritability (h
2b) was recorded for days to maturity (99.52%) followed by days to 50% flowering (99.19%), 100-seed weight (97.02%) number of seeds pod
-1 (79.96%), plant height from ground to first pod (75.85%) and number of pods plant
-1 (73.80%). The high degree of heritability estimates for most of the traits suggested that the characters are under genotypic control. While, the value of genetic advance (GA) calculated in this study ranged from 0.37% to 229.07% having highest for grain yield kg ha
-1 (229.07%) followed by number of pods plant
-1 (25.11%). Likewise, the present study high variability parameters for pods/ plant and grain yield were reported by
Jha et al., (2015). High heritability coupled with high genetic advance and GCV were noticed for grain yield, number of pods plant
-1 and 100-seed weight. From the study of heritability and genetic advance it is inferred that simple selection among germplasm accessions can bring about significant improvement in these traits as the heritability and estimated genetic advance were high. The present studies are akin with
Vaghela et al., (2015) and
Yucel (2020).
The genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients worked out among different characters revealed that in general the genotypic correlation coefficient were similar to phenotypic correlation coefficient (Table 3). In some cases the genotypic correlation was slightly higher than the phenotypic correlation coefficients, which may be a result of modifying effect of environments on the association of the characters. The grain yield showed significant positive correlation with 100-seed weight and number of pods plant
-1. In addition, its association with number of seeds pod
-1 and primary branches plant
-1 was positive but non-significant both at genotypic and phenotypic levels. The 100-seed weight had positive and significant correlation with days to 50% flowering, plant height, plant height from ground to first pod, number of primary branches plant
-1, number of pods plant
-1. The number of seeds pod
-1 showed significant positive correlation with days to maturity, plant height, plant height from ground to first pod and number of pods plant
-1. The days to 50 % flowering showed significant positive correlation with days to maturity, plant height, plant height from ground to first pod, number of pods plant
-1 and number of seed pod
-1. The associations of grain yield with other quantitative traits observed in the present study have also been reported in chickpea by earlier researchers (
Meena and Kumar 2012;
Jha et al., 2012; Gul et al., 2013; Paneliya et al., 2017). Present results indicating that these traits had good association with seed yield in chickpea and therefore, was important trait for bringing genetic improvement in seed yield.
Johanson et al., (1955) emphasized that these correlated yield attributes can serve as indicator characters for improving grain yield. Breeders can also concentrate their attention either on number of branches plant
-1 or number of pods plant
-1 to achieve higher seed yield while selection of individual plant in segregating materials of chickpea.
Vaghela et al., (2009) and Meena and Kumar (2012) also reported the similar results for fixed homozygous material. Correlation co-efficient indicates only the general associations between any two traits without tracing any possible causes of such associations. In such situations, the path coefficient analysis at phenotypic level is done to partition the correlation coefficients in to direct and indirect effects (Table 4). Grain yield was taken as dependent variable while computing the path coefficient. The path coefficient analysis revealed that the characters like 100-seed weight (0.45306) followed by number of seeds pod
-1 (0.43550), number of pods plant
-1 (0.19731) and number of primary branches plant
-1 (0.10108) which had positive significant association with grain yield also exerted positive and high direct effects on grain yield (Table 4). The positive and high direct effects of 100-seed weight, number of seeds pod
-1, number of pods plant
-1 and number of primary branches plant
-1 on grain yield was also observed by earlier workers in chickpea (
Thakur and Sirohi 2009;
Shafique et al., 2016; Mohammed and Fikre 2018). This confirms the role of these traits in determining the grain yield and therefore, their values in constructing the selection criterion.