Growth parameters
‘Plant height (cm) at harvest’, ‘Number of primary branches per plant’ and ‘Number of leaves per plant’
On the basis of two years pooled data, our results revealed that the various growth parameters increased significantly over control by the application of various organic and inorganic fertilizers (Table 2). This increase in growth attributes might be due to the enhanced photosynthetic activity, cell division, elongation and differentiation through the applied NPK in form of inorganic fertilizer and combination with organic manure (
Metkari and Dhok, 2011), resulting in higher increment of growth attributes
(Jagdale et al., 2005; Chauhan et al., 2010).
Among the treatments, application of ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost (T3)’ was recorded the best as it exhibited the highest plant height (34.04 cm), maximum numbers of primary branches (6.85) and maximum number of leaves (32.46) remaining statistically at par with the treatment ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through FYM (T2)’ and were significantly superior over control (T8) which exhibited the minimum plant height (22.80 cm), numbers of primary branches (3.83) and number of leaves (24.19). While comparing in terms of percentage growth, the treatment T3 recorded 49.30%, 78.85% and 34.19% increase in plant height, numbers of primary branches and number of leaves respectively over control (T8).
The increased growth with substitution of 50% N by organic manures might be due to the fact that organic manures release of nutrients slowly
(Sharma et al., 2015), which resulting in enhanced nutrient use efficiency
(Verma et al., 2015; Mohanty et al., 2017) and micro-nutrients availability
(Nawalgatti et al., 2009; Shubhashree et al., 2011).
Yield parameters
‘Pod length (cm)’, ‘Pod circumference (cm)’, ‘Average fresh weight of pod (g)’ and ‘No. of seeds /pod’
The results revealed occurrence of significant increase in various yield attributes over control by the application of organic and inorganic fertilizers except ‘average fresh weight of pod’ (Table 3).
Among the treatments, the treatment level ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost (T3)’ exhibited the highest ‘pod length’ (3.09 cm), ‘pod circumference’ (3.13 cm), ‘no. of seeds /pod’ (7.54) and ‘no. of pods/plant’ (20.46) which was at par with the treatment level ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through FYM (T2)’. The minimum values of yield attributes
i.e. ‘pod length’ (8.48 cm), ‘pod circumference’ (2.32 cm), ‘no. of seeds/pod’ (5.69) and ‘no. of pods/plant’ (11.22) were recorded in control. The exhibited higher yield of treatment comprising of inorganic fertilizers in combination with organic manures may be due to the increased availability and uptake of macro and micro nutrients by the plant, resulting in higher rate of physiological (
Barcchiya and Kushwah, 2017) and anabolic processes
(Sen et al., 2006; Ramana et al., 2010).
The percentage comparison reflects that treatment level III
i.e. ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost (T3)’ recorded and increase of 33.09%, 34.91%, 32.51% and 82.35% of ‘pod length’, ‘pod circumference’, ‘no. of seeds/pod’ and ‘no. of pods/plant’ respectively over the control (T8) plant.
In context to yield, the maximum yield (95.61 q/ha) was recorded with 75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost (T3) showing 125.39% and 35.17% increase over T8 (Control) and T1 (RDF) respectively, while the minimum yield (42.42 q/ha) was recorded with control (T8) where no fertilizer or compost was applied. However, no statistical difference was found between yield of treatment level III (95.61 q/ha)
i.e. ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost (T3)’ and treatment level II (90.11 q/ha)
i.e. ‘75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through FYM (T2)’. Further, the treatment level III (75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost), treatment level II (75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through FYM), treatment level V (50% NPK through inorganic + 50% N through Vermicompost) and treatment level IV (50% NPK through inorganic + 50% N through FYM) were at par with each other. The data on ‘average fresh weight of pod (g) indicated that there was no significant difference between the treatments for this attribute, which reflect that the treatments doesn’t have any adverse effect on the ‘Average fresh weight of pod’
(Manivannan et al., 2009; Barcchiya and Kushwah, 2017).
From an over view on our findings of growth and yield attributes, our results revealed that fertilizer requirement of French bean when met through 50-75% NPK through inorganic + 25-50% N through organic sources from either through Vermicompost or FYM, resulted in better yield and productivity (Table 3). This might be due to the ability of organic source to influence both the growth as well as yield attribute compared to that of sole application of (100% NPK) through inorganic source. This positive influence might be due the the favourable soil condition developed by the application of organic manure
(Sharma et al., 2015; Bhathal and Kumar, 2016) which thereby positively influencing the economic traits such as growth
(Chauhan et al., 2010; Mohanty et al., 2017) and yield attributes
(Das et al., 2011; Ramana et al., 2011).
Benefit cost ratio
The data on economics of various treatments (Table 4) revealed that the maximum benefit-cost ratio (2.16) was recorded in treatment T3
i.e. 75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through Vermicompost, which was followed by benefit-cost ratio 2.03 of treatment level II (75% NPK through inorganic + 25% N through FYM). The differences in benefit cost ratio defines and reflects the practical utility of the treatment level of integrated nutrient management
(Ramana et al., 2010; Sachan and Krishna, 2020).