Eighteen
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
Cicer is isolates from Andhra Pradesh and two isolates from Telangana were collected from wilt affected plants (Table 2).
After isolation, the pathogen was identified as Foc based on cultural characters and morphological characters (micro and macro conidia and chlamydospores)
(Venkataramanamma et al., 2019). All these isolates were confirmed as Foc based on pathogenicity test on susceptible check JG-62 (Table 2). These 20 isolates were subjected to virulence analysis on host differentials and all the isolates varied in causing wilt (0-100%) during the period. Incubation period differed from 16 to 40 days for wilting of host differentials for all Foc isolates. In more virulent isolates, the initial symptoms on JG-62 started to appear from 16th day onwards. It is in accordance with
Durai et al., (2012), who reported that incubation phase for Foc isolates was 15-35 days, whereas virulent isolates cause wilting and death of seedlings in 11-15 days and 25% of the isolates from A.P, Gujrat, Uttar pradesh and Rajasthan induced seedling mortality in 16-20 days. In two isolates (Foc-14 and Foc-18) wilting symptoms first observed on chaffa rather than JG-62.
Among 20 isolates studied, 16 isolates showed susceptible, 3 isolates showed moderately susceptible reaction on JG-62. All isolates recorded reaction as resistant on differentials such as CPS-1, BG-212, WR-315, GPF-2 and moderate susceptible to resistant reaction on JG-74 and KWR-108 (Table 3 and 4).
Whereas the cultivars C-104 and DCP-92-3 exhibited different reactions such as resistant, susceptible and moderate susceptible for Foc isolates. The cultivar chaffa exhibited moderate susceptible to susceptible reaction for isolates except Foc-3 and Foc-32. The two isolates (Foc-3 and Foc-32) which showed resistant reaction on chaffa were also examined on old host differentials
i.e., Annegiri, L-550 and K-850 and found resistant reaction on Annegiri and K-850 cultivars. Among 20 isolates, 17 isolates were categorized into race-1 based on resistant reaction on CPS-1, BG-212 and GPF-2 (Fig 1).
Two isolates such as Foc-3 (Kodumur, Kurnool dt andhra Pradesh) and Foc-32 (Bodhan, Nizamabad dt, Telangana) showed reaction as resistant on Chaffa and Annegiri besides CPS-1 and C-104 (moderate susceptible to resistant) were categorized as race-6.
The results are in accordance with
Haware and Nene (1982) who reported four races of Foc (race-1, race-2, race-3 and race-4) in India and presented race 1 from Hyderabad. They grouped Foc isolates as race-1 based on disease reaction of two cultivars such as CPS-1 and BG-212. Dubey
et al. (2012) reported two cultivars C-104 and GPF-2 as differentials (showing resistant reaction) for Foc isolates of A.P and reported race-1 in A.P and Karnataka. In this, susceptible, moderately susceptible and resistant reaction was found with cultivar C-104 for 17 isolates and these isolates were categorized as race-1 based on resistant reaction on CPS-1, BG-212 and GPF-2. Previous studies also reported race-1 from A.P
(Haware and Nene, 1982) and Karnataka states
(Reddy and Dubey, 2006). In our study also the results confirmed the presence of race-1 in Andhra Pradesh.
Phillips (1988) first observed the presence of race-6 in California depends on resistant reaction on Chaffa, Annegiri and K-850 as it was previously reported as race-1.
Reddy and Dubey (2006) reported three new races such as race-5, race-6 and race-7 in India along with previously reported races such as race-1, race-2, race-3 and race-4. They have categorized isolates of Foc into race-1 based on differential reaction of K-850, C-104, WR-315, BG-212, CPS-1 and race-6 based on disease reaction of Annegiri which has given resistant reaction along with WR-315, CPS-1 and C-104. Hence, in this study these two isolates (Foc-3 and 32) were categorized as race-6.
Sharma et al., (2014) collected 110 isolates from five different zones of India and reported race-1, race-2, race-4, race-6 and new reaction (14 isolates) on differentials such as JG-62, L-550, JG-74, Chaffa, C-104, CPS-1, WR-315, BG-212, Annegiri and K-850. They reported race-1 and race-6 from Andhra Pradesh. In this study, out of 20 isolates studied, 17 isolates showed the similar reaction of race-1, two isolates showed as race-6 and one isolate showed new reaction and this isolate (Foc-19) exhibited 0% incidence on differential lines except JG-62 (10% incidence) and Chaffa (6.66%).
Sharma et al., (2014) reported the presence of two races such as race-1 (47%) and race-6 (29%) dominantly out of 110 isolates studied and found that race-1 was widely distributed because of its high genetic diversity and wide inhabitation under the present conditions in all agro ecological zones of India with predominantly in southern zone. It might be due to the large exchange of germplasm and transmission of seeds that took place high in last one decade. In this study also, 17 isolates were grouped as race-1, two Foc isolates were grouped as race-6. Correll, 1991 reported that among all the races, race-1 is reported in India, California and Mediterranean region. Previously race-6 was confined to Mediterranean basin and also reported from California
(Phillips, 1988) subsequently reported from Spain
(Jimenez-Diaz et al., 1989), Israel and Morocco
(Kelly et al., 1994). Existence of this new race of Foc in India might be a recent introduction through seed transmission by huge interchange of germplasm and accumulation of mutations, which caused genetic variability of pathogen over the period of time.
Stepwise evolution of races in Foc resulted from specific resistance assortment in populations of chickpea or repeated migration might have happened rather than the evolution of races individually in different places or might be expected from an ancient heredity of race-1, it could be the common progenitor of all races
(Sharma et al., 2014). Additionally, there are reports that races-1 and 6 have similar virulence pattern on host differentials
(Halila and Strange, 1996 and Jimenez
Diaz et al., 1993), having high genetic similarities and shared some RAPD markers
(Jimenez-Gasco et al., 2001). It was further supported by
Jimenez-Gasco and Jimenez-Diaz (2003) who developed RAPD-SCAR common marker for race 1A and race 6 (FocR0-M15r, FocR6-P18f), which produced a single product of nearly 1,400-bp from genomic DNA of
F. oxysporum f.sp.
ciceris isolates fitting to races 1 and 6. Former researchers directed that it is also possible that mis categorization of these isolates ensued during pathogenicity test and evolutionarly also these two races were not yet separated from each other and to have developed diagnostic and separate pathogenicity test.
In this study, Foc isolates differed in wilt incidence on host differentials and also showing different pattern of virulence in some host differentials. Though farmers in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana chosed JG-11 as a major variety for cultivation, other varieties like KAK-2, NBeG-3, NBeG-47, Vihar and JAKI-9218 were also grown in some areas. In A.P, in recent years chickpea cropped area was very much increased than earlier years.
Sharma et al., (2014) mentioned that dissemination of virulence within and among populations of Foc may be the result of various selection pressures exerted by a specific resistant gene in the varieties of chickpea growing in that area. They also proposed that it could be the result of transfer in the cultivation of chickpea from northern India
(Gaur and Gowda, 2005) to southern India (In A.P. itself, chickpea area was 2.85 lakh ha in 2001-02 and raised to 6.02 lakh ha in 2006-07, source: www.indiastat.com) which further supported the low frequency of race-2, which was originally reported from Kanpur, north India and complete absence of race-3 disease reaction in any of the collected isolates. At the same time, irrespective of the origin, the similarities of race composition between the different zones of India indicated repeated migration of infected seeds. In the current study, race-6 reaction might be due to the cultivation of new varieties (pathogen is seed borne), brought from research stations or some other places and also accumulation of mutations over period of time. Hence, it is important to check the susceptibility of widely grown chickpea genotypes to Fusarium wilt, required continuous monitoring of changes in Foc group to know the racial outline.
Development and Validation of SCAR marker
The banding pattern obtained in RAPD with primers K5, K6 and P2 along with 1 kb marker was represented in Fig 1, 2 and 3.
The amplified product of polymorphic band of approximately 700 bp in the isolate Foc-12, obtained during RAPD analysis with P2 primer was selected for cloning and SCAR marker development. Two sets of primers
i.e., SCAR 1(SCAR 1F/SCAR 1R) and SCAR 2(SCAR 2F/SCAR 2R) were designed (Table 5) based on a terminal sequence of amplified 700 bp DNA from Foc-12. The designed primers were synthesized at Sigma Aldrich chemicals Pvt.Ltd, Bengaluru.
These SCAR markers were validated for the five Foc isolates such as Foc-6, Foc-10, Foc-12, Foc-17 and Foc-24. The results of validation indicated that the same fragment size (700 bp) was obtained in Foc-12 with the primer pair of SCAR 1F/SCAR 2R and SCAR 2F/SCAR 1R and this band was absent in the remaining four isolates such as Foc-6, Foc-10, Foc-17 and Foc-24. Thus this primer set was successfully validated (Fig 4). Thus the certainity of these markers were confirmed, where as with other primer set (SCAR 1F/SCAR 1R and SCAR 2F/SCAR 2R) a thin DNA fragment (700 bp) was noticed in Foc-12, not resembling with other pair, where thick and conspicuous DNA fragment of same size with same molecular weight was obtained. All the five isolates including Foc-12 are showing race-1 disease reaction on host differentials.
Jimenez-Gasco and Jimenez-Diaz (2003) developed SCAR primers by using RAPD markers for Foc isolates and races 0, 1A, 5 and 6. In this study, SCAR marker was developed for Foc-12 isolate but not for race-1. Similarly, Dubey (2010) developed markers based on ITS region for identification of Foc population in India.
Durai et al., (2012) developed first time two sets of primer pairs SC-FOC1 and SC-FOC2 for identification of Foc population and they were checked against 36 collected Foc isolates representing different races present in India and confirmed the specificity of those markers.
Katkar et al., (2015) validated the specific SCAR primers for FOC (developed by
Jimenez-Gasco and Jimenez-Diaz, 2003) and for all four Indian races such as race-1, 2, 3 and 4.
In the existing study, diverse size of bands were observed in all the five belonging to same race (race-1) during RAPD analysis and the pattern of bands was not capable to distinguish them. This might be due to random nature of RAPD markers and seemed to be unable to focus the genetic regions that are responsible for specification of races. Understanding the genetic mechanisms of race cultivar specificity in
F. oxysporumare largely unknown, due to the absence of a sexual stage in this fungus and genetic analysis
(Huertas-Gonzalez et al., 1999) is difficult. Thus, the selected unique band in Foc-12 was validated with the developed SCAR markers.