Growth parameters of groundnut as influenced by Paclobutrazol
Plant height
There was significant variation in plant height among treatments due to application of paclobutrazol after 30 DAE because paclobutrazol was not applied before (Table 1). After application of paclobutrazol, plant height decreased with increased concentration of paclobutrazol after 30 DAE till harvest. Plant height was lowest with application of 200 ppm paclobutrazol (52.4 cm) over control (72.5 cm). Significant variation in plant height was observed and the plant height reduced between 4.3%-27.7% over control. The plant internode elongation was reduced to 53.1 cm when paclobutrazol was applied at 30 and 50 DAE, which was at par with 50 DAE (59.6 cm). The plant height taken at harvest with application of paclobutrazol applied at 30 and 50 DAE, showed an average of decrease of 9.6 and 19.4% over single application at 30 and 50 DAE, respectively. The shortening effect of the double application of paclobutrazol was due to reduction of the number of stem nodes per plant. Paclobutrazol, being a triazole growth retardant inhibit biosynthesis of gibberellins by blocking kaurene oxidase resulting in decreased inter-nodal elongation. Similar results on variation in height due to application of paclobutrazol was also reported by
Kumar et al., (2012), Koutroubas et al., (2015), Kumar et al., (2016) and Barman
et al. (2017).
Crop growth rate (CGR)
Among different main plot treatments, crop growth rate (CGR) varied significantly from 30-45 DAE to 90 DAE -harvest. The CGR was highest when paclobutrazol was applied @100 ppm over other treatments irrespective of different intervals. Application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm obtained maximum CGR (0.064 g/plant/day) at 30-60 DAE, (0.308 g/plant/day) at 61-90 DAE and (0.075 g/plant/day) over all other treatments (Table 1). Significant result was found with different time of application. Application of paclobutrazol at 30 DAE registered maximum CGR (0.247 g/plant/day) at 61-90 DAE and (0.075 g/plant/day) at 91 DAE-at harvest expect 30-60 DAE although it was at par with application of paclobutrazol at 30 and 50 DAE with CGR (0.052 g/plant/day).This may be due to increased photosynthetic rate through synthesis more cytokinin, which in turn enhanced chlorophyll biosynthesis, because of application of paclobutrazol. This results are in tune with
(Kumar et al., 2012), Dewi et al., (2016) and
Barman et al., (2017).
Branch no. plant
The branches/plant increased with increased concentration of paclobutrazol till 100 ppm and then there was a reduction in branches/plant. Highest number of branches/ plant was observed with application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm (4.9) followed by 50 ppm (4.8) and lowest was with 200 ppm (4) (Table 1). In case of time of spraying, branches/plant was highest with single spraying at 30 DAE (4.7) followed by single spraying at 50 DAE (4.4). Similar results were also reported by
Senoo and Isoda, (2003).
Root dry weight
Dry root of plants varied significantly amongst different treatments comprising different concentrations of paclobutrazol (Table 1). Among different main plots, application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm accrued highest root dry weight/plant (3.80 g) which was at par with application of paclobutrazol @ 150 ppm (3.61 g/plant). Comparing different time of application, application of paclobutrazol at 30 DAE recorded highest root dry weight (3.32 g/plant). The interaction effect was non-significant. The application of paclobutrazol might have helped in increased root activity which resulted higher root growth and root vigour. Similar type of results was obtained by
Kamran et al., (2018).
Effect of Paclobutrazol on yield and yield attributing parameters
The different yield attributes of groundnut differed significantly due to foliar spray of various concentration of paclobutrazol. Number of pods/ plant was not varied due to foliar application of different concentration of paclobutrazol. Maximum no. of pods/plant were noted with application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm (17.7) which was at par with paclobutrazol @ 50 ppm (17.2) and lowest no. of pods/ plant with highest no. of aerial pegs was noted in control (14.2). Similarly, it also obtained highest 100 kernel weight (38.3 g) which was at par with application of paclobutrazol @ 50 ppm (37.1 g). Foliar spray of paclobutrazol at 30 DAE obtained maximum no. pods/plant (18) compared which was at par with double spraying of 30 and 50 DAE (17.2). Number aerial pegs varied significantly due to foliar spray of different concentration of paclobutrazol. Among different concentration of paclobutrazol, application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm produced significantly minimum no. of aerial pegs (19.7/plant) over all other treatments and maximum no. were observed in control (37.1). Among different time of application, significantly lowest number of aerial pegs were produced when paclobutrazol was applied 30 DAE (24.3) over other treatments. This might be due to decreased height of plant in paclobutrazol treated plants in comparison to control.
Groundnut pod yield increased significantly due foliar application of paclobutrazol at different levels. The pod yield increased by 1.2%, 9.5%, 16.7% and 3.4%, respectively when compared to control with application of 25 ppm, 50 ppm, 100 ppm and 150 ppm of paclobutrazol as indicated in Table 2. But the pod yield reduced by 8.4% with foliar application of paclobutrazol @ 200 ppm in comparison to control. Regarding time of application, the highest pod yield was recorded with application of paclobutrazol at 30 DAE (1954 kg/ha) which was at par with 50 DAE (1819). The pod yield increased by 17.5% and 9.4%, respectively at single application of 30 DAE and 50 DAE over dual application of paclobutrazol at 30 and 50 DAE.
The possible increments in pod yield might be due to the change in canopy coverage, in which the plant developed broader canopy due to decreased height, which in turn facilitated improved light interception for better photosynthesis in leaves and stems of paclobutrazol treated plants. This may explain increased dry matter accumulation in stem and root and simultaneous yield. Similar result was witnessed by
Hua et al., (2014) and
Barman et al., (2017).
Further, decreased yield due to dual application of paclobutrazol might be due to synchronization of application with maximum flowering stage, this in turn reduced number of flowers so also yield.
Effect of Paclobutrazol on economics
Economics of different levels of paclobutrazol indicated that highest benefit cost ratio (1.97) and net return (₹ 41293/ha) were obtained with application of paclobutrazol @ 100 ppm followed by 50 ppm (1.86 and Rs 39374/ha). Among different time of application, application of paclobutrazol at 30 DAE excelled over treatments with highest net return (₹ 41293/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.92).