Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 45 issue 6 (june 2022) : 780-789

Spatio-temporal Variability and Climate Change Impact on the Crop Water Requirement of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) - A Case Study, North-Eastern Karnataka, India

Siddharam1, J.B. Kambale1,*, M. Nemichandrappa1, A.T. Dandekar1, D. Basavaraja2
1Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-585 104, Karnataka, India.
2Department of Environmental Science, College of Agriculture, Bheemarayanagudi, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur-585 104, Karnataka, India.
  • Submitted10-02-2020|

  • Accepted01-09-2020|

  • First Online 21-12-2020|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4348

Cite article:- Siddharam, Kambale J.B., Nemichandrappa M., Dandekar A.T., Basavaraja D. (2022). Spatio-temporal Variability and Climate Change Impact on the Crop Water Requirement of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) - A Case Study, North-Eastern Karnataka, India . Legume Research. 45(6): 780-789. doi: 10.18805/LR-4348.
Background: Global climate change and its impact on crop water requirement have widely discussed in recent years. In the present century, climate change had become a significant concern and atmospheric temperature is the dominant climatic factor that indicates the changes in both regional and global scales. This study was undertaken to evaluate the trend and predict the changes in crop water requirement under various climate change scenarios. 

Methods: The statistical nonparametric Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope used to identify trend in the data series. In this study ArcGIS V. xx software used for investigating spatial patterns in data. CROPWAT-8.0 model used for calculation of crop water requirement under various climate change scenarios. Total six climate change scenarios were considered for assessment.

Result: The crop water requirement (ETc) of pigeonpea estimated and exhibited an increasing trend and a decreasing trend in study area in the past 35 years. The spatial distribution maps reveal that the distribution of ETc is found an increasing trend in all the scenarios to reference ETc. An increasing trend of ETc of pigeon pea was observed in all the places under various climate change scenarios. It was suggested to promote rainwater harvesting, soil and water conservation and increase ground water recharge in the study area to minimize the risk of yield reduction due to the availability of minimum water under changing climatic condition.
Climate change is an alteration in annual, seasonal variation of weather conditions, or in the time variation of weather within the context of longer-term average conditions (IPCC, 2007). It was also observed that the global mean surface temperature increased by (0.74 °C±0.18°C) from 1906 to 2005 (Trenberth et al., 2007). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predictions indicates that the average global surface temperature expected to rise by (1.4 to 5.8°C) by 2100 under different greenhouse gas emission scenarios (IPCC, 2007). According to Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment (INCCA), the annual mean surface air temperature of Indian subcontinent projected to rise by (1.7°C) and (2.0°C) in the 2030s (INCCA, 2010). As temperature rises, it may bring an adverse effect on the availability of water (Kambale et al., 2017). As we all know, agriculture is the largest sector in water use in many countries, including India. The impact of climate change on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) becomes essential for water management and agricultural sustainability. Climatic factors other than temperature, like solar radiation, relative humidity, wind speed and rainfall also influence the ETc. Consequently, any variation in these factors will also affect the ETc. These changes are, however, difficult to project, especially on regional or local scales (Chattopadhyay and Hulme, 1997). It also reveals an increase in ETc rate over different regions in the world due to the rising temperature (Ficklin et al., 2012). In the Indian subcontinent, the precipitation trend has been random i.e. both regions reported decreasing and increasing trend. However, total precipitation occurred over the country has increased (Darshana and Pandey, 2013).
       
India ranks first in yearly pigeon pea production with (2.65 MT) followed by Myanmar (0.9 MT), Malawi (0.23 MT), Tanzania (0.20 MT) and Kenya (0.09 MT) (www.faostat.org.). India is the largest producer, with about (2.65 MT), accounting of about (72 per cent) of total world production which concentrated in central and southern parts of India. Mishra et al., (2017) examined the impact of the difference in climatic variables, viz. temperature and rainfall on a yield of pigeon pea by using district-level panel data from 1980-2011 in Gujarat. Abdrabbo et al., (2016) investigated the projected changes in evapotranspiration (ETo) in Egypt, revealed that ETo significantly increased in different tested time series compared to current ETo values.
       
Numerous authors, researchers and scientists have studied the climate change impact on agriculture, crop yield, irrigation water requirement, crop water requirement and also changes in weather parameters all over the world  (Ahalavat and Kaur, 2015; Chakraborty and Hazari, 2017; Wang et al., 2016; Rotich, 2017; Rao et al., 2015; Parekh and Prajapati, 2013; Mohan and Ramsundram, 2014). The impact of climate change on crop water requirement was studied by statistical methods as well as different climatic models. With the help of these techniques, one can investigate the impact under different climatic scenarios, which would otherwise be costly and time-consuming if done experimentally. Considering the above facts, the research carried out to investigate the long term spatio-temporal variability, analysis of its trend of crop water requirement of pigeon pea.
Description of study area
 
The area selected for the present study comes under the north eastern dry zone of the agro-climatic condition of Karnataka state, India (Fig 1). The study presented here, carried out during 2018-19 at the College of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur. Work process flow chart presented in Fig 2. The entire district located on Deccan plateau and altitude range from (300 to 750 m) above mean sea level (MSL). Most of the area is covered with black soil and to some extent, red soil as well. The study area lies between (17°12¢ and 17°46¢ N) latitude and (76°4¢ and 77°54¢ E) longitude.

Fig 1: Location of the study area.



Fig 2: Study process flow chart.


 
Climate
 
The climate of the district is generally dry with, temperature ranging from a minimum of (8°C) to a maximum of (45°C) and annual rainfall is about (750 mm). May is the hottest month with an average maximum temperature of (40°C) and December is the coldest month, with an average minimum temperature of (15.9°C). During peak summer, the temperature shoots up to (45°C) and average wind speed is (5.5 ms-1), average day length varies from (10-12 hours) and relative humidity ranges from (26 per cent) during summer to (62 per cent) during rainy and winter season.
 
Weather data
 
The long-term weather data of average temperature (°C), maximum and minimum temperature (°C), rainfall (mm), wind speed (ms-1), relative humidity (%) and solar radiation (MJm-2day-1) obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration prediction of worldwide energy resource (NASA POWER) project (Hassan et al., 2019, Siddharam et al., 2020). Historical data for all weather parameters collected for seven weather stations viz. Aland, Afzalpur, Chincholi, Chittapur, Kalaburgi, Sedam and Jewargi, for the periods of 1981-2018.
 
Soil properties
 
The data related to soil properties include soil type, field capacity, wilting point maximum infiltration rate, initial soil moisture depletion and initially available soil moisture collected from CROPWAT 8 standard datasets and presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Properties of Soil.


 
Crop data
 
The crop data were pertinent to growth such as crop coefficient (kc), crop growth stages, crop growth yield response factor and crop height collected and used as an input parameter to CROPWAT 8 model for calculation of crop water requirement in pigeonpea. The crop growth stage, yield response factor and crop height data obtained by in situ samplings from the study area. The parameters like kc, canopy factor were collected according to Nagraj (2019). The kc values of pigeonpea with growth stages presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Crop coefficient for crop growth parameters.


 
Land use
 
The Landsat-8 satellite imagery/images acquired from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) through earth explorer (Alam, 2019) on 21/11/2018 used in this study. Landsat-8 images contain eleven spectral bands. Landsat-8 having a spatial resolution of (30 m) except band 8 and that is (15 m). Approximate scene size is (170 km) north-south by (183 km) east-west. The band combination of 7, 5, 2 - (False colour image) conveniently used for the monitoring of crops displayed in bright green colour, bare earth in purple colour and not cultivated vegetation appears in subtle green. The Kalaburgi district has mixed land use. The general land use map of pigeonpea Kalaburgi district is presented in Fig 3.

Fig 3: Land use classification of the study area.


 
Spatial analysis
 
A spatial analysis tool available in the ArcGIS V. xx software used for investigating spatial patterns in data. Spatial interpolation, or the estimation of a variable at an unsampled location using data from surrounding sampled areas, has great importance in all-natural and atmospheric sciences. The spatial analysis tool in the Arc GIS V. xx software used for interpolation creating and analysing the map of long term annual meteorological data. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation technique used to create the map of weather parameters of the study area. We used this technique because IDW technique takes the less neighbouring unknown location points and it will give more accurate results than the kriging and spline or any other interpolation technique (Po et al., 2017).

Crop water requirement
 
Prediction methods for crop water requirements invariably used owing to the complexity of obtaining accurate field measurements. The methods often need to be applied under climatic and agronomic conditions very different from those under which they were initially developed. Testing the accuracy of the methods under a new set of circumstances is difficult, time-consuming and costly. Yet, crop water requirement data frequently needed at short notice for project planning. The CROPWAT 8.0 model developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is an irrigation management model used to evaluate crop water requirements and irrigation needs (Clarke et al., 1998).
 
CROPWAT 8
 
It is a decision support system developed by the Land and Water Development Division of Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). CROPWAT can estimate reference evapotranspiration, crop water requirements and irrigation requirements. It can also be used to evaluate the effect of variations in climatic parameters on crop water requirement and assess the impact of climate change. The major inputs requirements of CROPWAT model include crop parameters, meteorological data and soil type. The required meteorological data are maximum and minimum temperatures, wind speed, solar radiation, relative humidity and rainfall. CROPWAT was used to estimate the ETo using Penman-Monteith method. Crop water requirement of pigeonpea estimated for each year starting from 1981-2018 using ETo, crop coefficients and number of growing days. The crop coefficients and stages of crop development are presented in Table 2 previously. Climate change scenarios considered with reference scenarios (baseline) consist of average values of various weather parameters from 1981-2018 (Table 3). Water requirement for different scenarios was compared to evaluate the impact of climate on it.

Table 3: Climate change scenarios considered for prediction of crop water requirement under pigeonpea.



Statistical analysis 

Statistical analysis of long-term crop water requirement data executed in MS office Excel spreadsheet package. The analysis carried out by using statistical methods of the nonparametric Mann-Kendall test for testing the presence of the monotonic increasing or decreasing trend and the nonparametric Sen’s method for estimating the slope of a linear trend in the study area. The detailed estimation procedure and formulae used for its calculations given in (Siddaram et al., 2020).
Crop water requirement (ETc)
 
Crop water requirements of pigeonpea were estimated by taking the past 35 years long term data (Mohan and Ramsundram, 2014) of Aland, Afzalpur, Chincholi, Chittapur, Jewargi, Kalaburgi and Sedam and the results are presented in Fig 4 (a to g). Table 4 presents Mann- Kendall trend (Z), Sen’s slope value (Q) long term average, yearly highest and lowest values of ETc in mm from 1981 to 2018 over the Afzalpur, Aland, Chincholi, Chittapur, Kalaburgi, Sedam and Jewargi. These were estimated using all-important climatic parameters which control crop water requirement. In the Aland, the highest ETc (690.8 mm) for pigeon pea was observed in 2013 and the lowest (280.4 mm) in 1984 and recorded the average ETc of (550 mm) (Fig 4a). The statistical analysis carried out for ETc over Aland observed positive trend in the series for Mann- Kendall test (Z) with 0.795 and Sen’s slope (Q) with 0.850. The highest ETc of (785.7 mm) was recorded at Afzalpur in 1988 and the lowest of (533 mm) in 2007 and the average ETc of (533 mm) was recorded of pigeon pea (Fig 4b). The ETc of pigeonpea calculated at Chincholi recorded the highest of (881.1 mm) in 2000, the lowest of (509.8 mm) in 1998 and the average of (608.22 mm). The highest ETc of (660.7 mm) in 2018, the lowest of (450.4 mm) in 2004 and the average of (531.2 mm) were recorded at Chittapur (Fig 4d). The highest ETc (857.9 mm) was recorded in 2001, while the lowest (483.4 mm) was in 2005 and the average ETc of (578.3 mm) displayed in Kalaburgi (Fig 4e). Similarly, the highest ETc of (660.4 and 678.3 mm) was observed in 2018 at Sedam and Jewargi respectively, whereas the lowest of (450.5 and 483.7 mm) was observed in 2005 at Sedam and Jewargi respectively. The average value of ETc of (534.4 mm) was reported at Sedam (Fig 4f) and (562 mm) at Jewargi (Fig 4g). Results indicated that ETc of pigeonpea exhibited a decreasing trend at Afzalpur, Chincholi and Kalaburgi and increasing trend at Aland, Chittapur, Sedam and Jewargi in the past 35 years. Also, in the study area observed that decreasing in wind speed, relative humidity and solar radiations are influences the increasing of CWR (Kambale et al., 2017) at Aland, Chincholi, Chittapur. The study area consists of black soil and some extent of red soil, CWR depends on soil properties. The similar results were obtained by Trivedhi et al., (2018) who determined the actual evapotranspiration in the Shipra river basin. CROPWAT 8.0 Model was used to determine the potential evapotranspiration and subsequently actual evapotranspiration for the time series 1990 to 2010. The maximum average ETo (259.7 mm) was in the month of May due to highest temperature in this month and the minimum average ETo (90.5 mm) was in the month of December due to minimum temperature in this month. It can be concluded from the observation that the maximum average actual ET (288 mm) was in the month of May due to highest temperature in this month and the minimum average actual ET (34 mm) was in the month of November due to minimum temperature in this month. The overall long term crop water requirement data showed a positive trend in series for the last 35 years at Aland and Sedam. Similarly, statistical results for ETc observed a negative trend in the series over Afzalpur, Chincholi, Chittapur, Jewargi and Kalaburgi (Table 4).

Fig 4: Crop water requirement of pigeonpea at (a) Aland, (b) Afzalpur, (c) Chincholi, (d) Chittapur, (e) Kalburgi, (f) Sedam and (g) Jewargi.



Table 4: Yearly highest, lowest values, Long term average, Mann-Kendall trend (Z) and Sen’s slope value (Q of crop water requirement.


 
Predicted ETc under different climate change scenarios
 
Predicted ETc under different climate change scenarios with reference to average values of 35 years weather datasets is presented in Fig 5 and Table 4. The scenarios 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 2 based on IPCC and INCCA, respectively. For scenario 1, 2 and 3 observed the highest ETc with (718.8 mm), (722.7 mm) and (728.5 mm) for Jewargi and the lowest with (705.6 mm), (709.4 mm) and (715.2 mm) for Aland. The ETc for scenario 4 observed the highest with (734.5 mm) at Afzalpur and the lowest with (726 mm) at Chincholi. In case of scenario 5, the highest ETc with (767.5 mm) was observedat Jewargi and the lowest with (753.8 mm) at Aland. In scenario 6, the highest ETc (795.4 mm) observed at Afzalpur and the lowest (781.1 mm) was at Aland. Similar results were also obtained by Shahid (2011) and Fisher et al., (2007) in their conducted studies.  In overall ETc of pigeonpea observed an increasing trend in all the places under various climate change scenarios. A similar line of results was obtained by Kambale et al., (2017). The maximum and minimum of ETc observed in scenario 6 and scenario 2, respectively. Under the INCCA and IPCC future prediction scenarios for climate change on the rise in temperature predicted by them an increase in the level of ETc for all locations (Manasa and Anand, 2016). It is important to note that the predicted ETc under IPCC and INCCA scenarios follows the trend of ETc estimated for Aland, Chittapur, Sedam and Jewargi from long term weather data.

Fig 5: Crop water requirement of pigeonpea under different climate change scenarios for locations a) Aland, b) Afzalpur, c) Chincholi, d) Chittapur, e) Kalburgi, f) Sedam and g) Jewargi.


 
Spatial analysis
 
The spatial variability maps of crop water requirement prepared to display its spatial distribution in the study area. The spatial variability analysis of estimated crop water requirement of pigeonpea carried out in ArcGIS Vr.xx with spatial analyst tool by IDW interpolation technique. Spatial variability maps for the selected study area of crop water requirement (ETc) under different climate change scenarios are presented in Fig 6 (a-e). The Fig 6(a) exhibited the spatial distribution of ETc (Liet_al2017) for the reference scenario of the study area with minimum values range of (530 to 535.27 mm) at Afzalpur, Jewargi and Chittapur and the highest of (581.5 to 599.9 mm) at Chincholi area. The ETc predicted for scenario one displayed in Fig 6(b) and the lowest ETc observed over the Aland with a range of (705.6 to 709.59 mm) and the highest with ranges (715 to 718 mm) distributed over the Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam for the case of Scenario-1. In scenario-2, the minimum ETc range of (709 to 713 mm) distributed over Aland and the highest in the range of (719 to 722 mm) over Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam and is shown in Fig 6(c). The ETc estimated under scenario-3 shown in Fig 6 (d). The spatial variability of ETc found less of (715 to 719 mm) at Aland and the highest found with a range of (725 to 728 mm) at Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam. The spatial distribution of scenario-4 ETc is shown in Fig 6 (e) and found less of (726 to 728 mm) at Chincholi and part of Jewargi and Chittapur and the highest with a range of (732 to 734 mm) was found at Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam. The spatial distribution of scenario-5 ETshown in Fig 6 (f) the spatial distribution of scenario-6 ETc is shown in Fig 6 (g) and found less (781 to 785 mm) at Aland and the highest with a range of (791 to 795 mm) at Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam. The spatial distribution maps reveal that the distribution of ETis found an increasing trend in all the scenarios to reference scenarios ETc. In all the scenarios ETc is less at Aland, except scenario-4, the highest at Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam.

Fig 6: Spatial variability maps of crop water requirement, mm under different climate change scenarios.

The net impact of climate change on crop water requirement would depend on two important climatic factors, namely rainfall and temperature. This may be due to the controlling of other climatic parameters. The major conclusions drawn from the study are;
  • The ETc of pigeonpea estimated and exhibited an increasing trend at Afzalpur, Jewargi and Kalburg and a decreasing trend at Aland, Chittapur, Sedam and Chincholi in the past 35 years.
  • ETc of pigeonpea observed an increasing trend at all the places under various climate change scenarios. Under the INCCA and IPCC future prediction scenarios, the maximum and minimum of ETobserved in scenario 6 and scenario 2, respectively.

  • It is important to note that the predicted ETc under IPCC and INCCA scenarios follows the trend of ETestimated for Aland, Chittapur, Sedam and Jewargi from long term weather data.

  • The spatial distribution maps reveal that the distribution of ETc is found an increasing trend in all the scenarios  to reference ETcc. In all the scenarios ETis less at Aland,except scenario 4 and the highest at Afzalpur, Kalaburgi and Sedam.

  • Looking at the impact of the variability of climate on crop water requirement on pigeonpea there is need to promote adoption measures viz. rainwater harvesting, soil and water conservation and increase groundwater recharge in the  study area to minimize the risk of yield reduction due to climatic variability.

Authors would like to thanks unknown reviewers for their valuable suggestion in an improvement of manuscript.

  1. Abdrabbo, M.A.A., Saleh, S.M., Farag, A.A. (2016). Water requirements for maize under climate change water requirements climate change for maize. Journal of Applied Science Research. 12: 19-28.

  2. Ahlawat, S. and Kaur, D. (2015). Climate change and food production in North West India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49: 544-548.

  3. Alam, A., Sultan, B. M., Maheen, M. (2019). Using Landsat satellite data for assessing the land use and land cover change in Kashmir valley. GeoJournal. 5: 1-15.

  4. Chakraborty, B. and Hazari, S. (2017). Impact of climate change on yields of major agricultural crops in Tripura. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51: 399-401.

  5. Chattopadhyay, N. and Hulme, M. (1997). Evaporation and potential evapotranspiration in India under conditions of recent and future climate change. Agricultural Forest Meteorology. 434: 55-73.

  6. Clarke, D., Smith, M., Askari, K. (1998) New software for crop water requirements and irrigation scheduling. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 47: 45-58.

  7. Darshana, D. and Pandey, A. (2013). Statistical analysis of long term spatial and temporal trends of precipitation during 1901–2002 at Madhya Pradesh, India. Atmospheric Research. 122: 136-149.

  8. Ficklin, D.L., Stewart, I.T., Maurer, E.P. (2012) Effects of projected climate change on the hydrology in the Mono Lake Basin, California. Climate Change. 116: 111-131.

  9. Fischer, G., Tubiello, F. N., Velthuizen, H. (2007). Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: effects of mitigation, 1990-2080. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 74: 1083-1107.

  10. Hassan, A., Mostafa, M., Gamal, A. (2019). Assessment of agroclimatology NASA POWER reanalysis datasets for temperature types and relative humidity at 2 meters against ground observations over Egypt. Advances in Space Research. 5: 1-20.

  11. INCCA. (2010). Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment, Climate Change and India: A 4x4 Assessment, Ministry of Environment and forests, Government of India.

  12. IPCC. (2007). Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Summary for policymakers, pp: 23.

  13. Kambale, J.B., Singh, D.K., Sarangi, A. (2017). Impact of climate change on groundwater recharge in a semi-arid region of northern India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 15: 335-362.

  14. Kambale, J.B. (2018). Climate change impact on water availability and demand of irrigation water - a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7: 4349-4360. 

  15. Kambale, J.B., Singh, D.K., Sarangi, A. (2017). Modelling climate change impact on crop evapotranspiration. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 16: 953-958.

  16. Kendall, M.G. (1975). Rank correlation methods. Charles Griffin: London.

  17. Li, C., Wu, P.T., Li, X.L., Zhou, T.W., Sun, S.K., Wang, Y.B., Luan, X.B., Yu, X. (2017). Spatial and temporal evolution of climatic factors and its impacts on potential evapotranspiration in Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China. Science of the Total Environment. 3: 1-8. 

  18. Manasa H.G. and Anand V.S. (2016). Implications of climate change on crop water requirements in hukkeri taluk of Belagavi district, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 5: 1-6.

  19. Mishra, S., Singh, R., Kumar, R., Kalia, A., Panigrahy, S.R. (2017). Impact of climate change on pigeonpea. Economic Affairs. 62: 455-457. 

  20. Mohan, S. and Ramsundram, N. (2014). Climate change and its impact on irrigation water requirements on temporal scale. Irrigation and Drainage System Engineering. 3: 1-8.

  21. Nagraj, D.M. (2019). Performance evaluation of pigeonpea under drip irrigation and plastic mulch under Raichur agroclimatic condition. Unpublished thesis, University of agricultural sciences, Raichur. 

  22. Parekh F. and Prajapati A.P. (2013). Climate change impacts on crop water requirement for the Sukhi reservoir project. International Journal Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2: 4685-4692.

  23. Po, Y.N., Lawin, E.A., Yao, B.K., Oyerinde, G.T., Attogouinon, A., Afouda, A.A. (2017). Decreasing past and mid-century rainfall indices over the Queme river basin, Benin (West Africa). Climate. 4: 74-80.

  24. Rao, B.B, Manikandan N., Rao, V.U.M. (2015). Assessing the climate variability impacts using real time groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield data from an arid region of Peninsular India. Legume Research-An International Journal. 38: 334-340.

  25. Rotich, S.C. and Mulungu, D.M.M. (2017). Adaptation to climate change impacts on crop water requirements in Kikafu catchments, Tanzania. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 8: 274-292. 

  26. Shahid, S. (2011). Impact of climate change on irrigation water demand of dry season Boro rice in northwest Bangladesh. Climatic Change. 105: 433-453.

  27. Siddaram, Kambale, J.B., Basavaraja, D. Nemichandrappa, M., Dandekar. A. (2020). Assessment of long term spatio-temporal variability and standardized anomaly index of rainfall of the northeastern region, Karnataka, India, climate change. 6: 1-11.

  28. Trenberth, K., Stepaniak, D.P., Caron, J.N. (2007). Atlantic hurricanes and natural variability in 2005. Geophysical Research. 33: 247-267.

  29. Trivedi, A., Pyasi, S.K., Galkate, R.V. (2018). Estimation of evapo- -transpiration using CROPWAT 8.0 model for shipra river basin in Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 7: 1248-1259.

  30. Wang, X., Zhang, J.Y., Ali, M., Shahid, S., He, R.M., Xia, X., Jiang, Z. (2016). Impact of climate change on regional irrigation water demand in Baojixia irrigation district of China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 21: 233-247. 

  31. www.faostat.org. Accessed on 07/04/2019.

  32. https://power.larc.nasa.gov. Accessed on 01/02/2019.

Editorial Board

View all (0)