Screening of germplasm
Among the germplasm lines screened under natural conditions only two lines
viz., EC 241778 and EC 241780 consistently confirmed their resistance to rust during rainy seasons of 2002 and 2003. These lines showed highly resistant reaction (1 grade) with most of the top leaves free from rust pustules. These lines are in conformity with the findings of
Patil and Basavaraja (1997). About 6 lines exhibited moderately resistant reaction (5 grade). The remaining lines showed susceptible (7 grade) to highly susceptible (9 grade) reaction.
Advanced breeding lines
The two exotic rust resistant lines and three popular varieties cultivated in Karanataka, which were highly susceptible to rust,
viz., JS 335, JS 93-05 and DSb-1 were used in a long term breeding programme at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka. The three promising lines thus developed
viz., DSb 21, DSb 23-2 and DSB 28-3were further evaluated for their reaction to rust under natural epiphytotic condition from 2010 to 2013 (Table 2b)
(Koraddi et al., 2017). Consistently in all the four years of screening these lines exhibited a score of 1
i.e., highly resistant reaction to rust, while the check, JS 335 exhibited a score of 9, indicating highly susceptible reaction to rust (Fig 2b, 3a and 3b).
Further these three promising lines were evaluated for their productivity under rust prone conditions at both the hotspots
viz.,Ugarkhurd and Dharwad for four years
i.e., from 2012 to 2013 along with popular variety, JS 335 as check. Under rust prone conditions, among these three lines evaluated, DSb 21 recorded highest seed yield of 1955 kg/ha, which is 157% increase over the check JS 335. Similarly, DSb 23-2 and DSb 28-3 recorded an average seed yield of 1918 kg/ha (152% increase) and 1768 kg/ha (132% increase) respectively (Table 3).
These lines were also characterized for other traits like plant height, days to maturity, flower colour, pubescence and hilum colour. The results of which are presented in Table 4. All the three genotypes exhibited increased plant height compared to the check variety. Both DSb 21 and DSb 23-2 matured in 90-95 days while DSb 23-2 was late maturing which recorded a mean of 95-100 days. JS 335 was early maturing (85-90 days) compared to all the test entries. The three genotypes also exhibited variation in flower colour which could be used as one of the distinguishing morphological features of the three genotypes.
From among the three highly productive and rust resistant lines identified, DSb 21 entered into the All India Coordinated Trial during 2011 (Initial Varietal Trial). Later it was promoted to Advanced Varietal Trial I and II during 2012 and 2013 based on its superior performance and resistance to rust. The performance of DSb 21 in Southern Zone of All India Coordinated Trials (Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala and southern parts of Maharashtra Statesis presented in Table 5. From the table it is evident that DSb 21 recorded 17 per cent yield superiority over the check, JS 335. Based on the three years performance in coordinated trials it was released for Southern Zone of India during 44
th Annual Workshop of AICRP on soybean.
Apart from rust resistance and increased yield, the line DSb 21 exhibited no change in seed size (14.02 g/100 seeds) even under rust prone conditions compared to check JS 335, which exhibited drastic reduction in seed size (6.42 g/100 seeds) under rust prone conditions (Fig 3c). Further, DSb 21 recorded highest yield of 5250 kg/ha in one of the large scale demonstrations revealing its maximum genetic potentiality.
DSb 21 is the first of its kind in India developed by University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. It has all the characteristic features of JS 335 (most popular cultivar) with an added advantage of resistance to rust and 10-12% yield superiority. Definitely, it will be a born to the soybean growing farmers by preventing significant yield losses due to soybean rust.
Inheritance studies
Information on the host differential response and genetics of resistance has lead to identification of six different rust resistance genes (
Rpp: Resistance to
P.
pachyrhizi), named
Rpp1 to
Rpp6, against specific isolates of
P. pachyrhizi (
Hartman et al., 2005;
Bonde et al., 2006; Miles et al., 2011). The reported six single dominant genes for specific resistance to
P. pachyrhizi have been identified in different cultivars as
Rpp1,
Rpp2, Rpp3, Rpp4 (PI 459025) (
Hartwig 1986),
Rpp5 (
Garcia et al., 2008) and
Rpp6 (Shuxian et al., 2012). From these studies, it was clear that resistance to rust was pathogen race specific and also cultivar specific. To study the inheritance of rust resistance in newly released rust resistant variety, DSb 21, two crosses, JS 335 × EC 241778 (Susceptible × Resistant) and DSb 21 × JS 335 (Resistant × Susceptible) were developed. The two F
1 crosses, F
2 population and their F
3 progenies along with the resistant and susceptible parents were scored for rust resistance (Table 6a and Fig 4a). The results indicated that in both the crosses, the F
1’s exhibited resistance reaction with score less than or equal to 3. In both the F2 segregating populations, resistant and susceptible plants were recorded in the ratio of 3 (resistant):1 (susceptible), indicating resistance is dominant over susceptibility. The above results are in conformity with the findings of
Bromfield and Hartwig (1980) who determined the inheritance of ASR resistance in two F
2 populations with PI 230970 and PI 230971 as the resistant parents. The analysis of these F
2’s showed that rust resistance was dominant and qualitatively (simply) inherited. Other studies have reported partial to complete dominance action in the inheritance of rust resistance
(Garcia et al., 2008; Ray et al., 2009). The result was also in line with the F
2 segregation analysis in six susceptible × resistant cross combinations which revealed that rust resistance is governed by a single dominant gene (
Rahangdale and Raut 2004). Further to confirm the results of F
2 generation, plant to progeny rows of each F
2 plant from both the crosses were raised to generate F
3 progenies. The results of disease scoring in F
3 progenies indicated segregation of 1 (resistant) : 2 (segregating) : 1 (susceptible) type of reaction (Table 6b and Fig 4b), confirming the results of F
2 generation, that rust resistance in DSb 21 and EC 241778 are controlled by a single dominant gene. Similar results of inheritance of disease resistance controlled by single dominat gene were reported by
Basamma et al., (2015) and
Talukdar et al., (2013) in blackgram and soybean for mung bean yellow mosaic virus and yellow mosaic virus resistance respectively.
The identified new resistance source in this study will be a useful resource for efficiently breeding resistant soybean cultivars to soybean rust, improved yield and broadening the genetic base with stability of performance.