Relative leaf water content
Relative leaf water content (RLWC) denotes the water status of plant decreased with the advancement of growth stages in all varieties. It maintained 54.3-89.2% at peak vegetative (40-45 DAS), 10-82.6% at flowering (60-65 DAS) and 0-66.1% during pod formation periods (80-85 DAS) (Table 2). The response of the cultivars for RLWC to different water treatments were observed different. Under I1 treatment, variety Asha showed more turgidity up to flowering period (82.6%) but variety Subrata got the maximum RLWC (69.1%) at pod formation. From peak vegetative stage, stress plots affected that signature with less RLWC and got severity during pod formation stage. Similar result was found by
Bandyopadhyay et al., (2018). In mild stress condition (I2) Asha regulated its RLWC at 71.8% followed by Subrata (64.6%) and Ranjan (57.3%). But in stress and severe stress conditions, PL6 and Ranjan were unable to retain their turgidity to satisfactory level during flowering stage which resulted in dry out of plants during pod maturity stage. However, Asha and Subrata showed satisfactory RLWC of 61.8% and 41.4% at flowering and pod maturity periods under stress condition (I3). During severe stress (I4), only cultivar Asha somehow was able to retain its turgidity to 32.7% up to pod maturity period.
Chlorophyll content
Chlorophyll content, an important indicator of metabolic activity and sign of drought stress, was measured during peak vegetative, flowering and pod maturity periods. Generally, chlorophyll content of leaf increased from vegetative to flowering period and dropped towards pod maturity (Table 3). With the increase in stress intensity, chlorophyll content decreased. For no stress condition, Subrata got the maximum chlorophyll content during peak vegetative (1.83 g l
-1) and flowering stages (2.82 g l
-1). Asha experienced the maximum value for mild to severe stress situation during vegetative, flowering and pod formation periods. Severe stress affected PL 6 the most with 0.065 g l
-1 during vegetative to 0.101 g l
-1 at flowering period. In stress treatment Subrata and Asha stood well by showing 0.705 and 1.31 g l
-1 chlorophyll content, during flowering stage. In a nutshell, with increasing stress only Asha proved to produce chlorophyll content enough to withstand water scarcity than other varieties.
Leaf area
The result showed that under no stress condition leaf area (LA) was recorded higher for Ranjan and the least for PL 6 during peak vegetative stage. With the increase in the intensity of water scarcity, LA decreased rapidly for all the cultivars except Asha (Table 4). Drought stress caused little change in LA with the advancement of growth. The water stress significantly decreased the leaf area and the magnitude of reduction increased with the increase in soil moisture stress. Fig 1 shows a linear relationship between RLWC and LA indicating that the drought could reduce leaf water potential, rate of cell division and enlargement due to loss of turgor
(Hussain et al., 2009). Under no stress treatment, maximum increase in LA from peak vegetative to flowering period was observed in Subrata (44.9%) followed by Asha (40.8 %). Under mild stress condition, Asha showed maximum LA (66%) whereas, PL6 resulted the highest under severe stress condition.
Root length density (RLD)
Root length density, an important parameter is closely related with soil moisture absorption
(Krishnamurthy et al., 1999). Under different moisture regimes, RLD values of four varieties are presented in Fig 2. In general, RLD decreased with the increase in water scarcity for all the cultivars and ranged from 0.23 to 0.33, 0.10 to 0.16 and 0.07 to 0.11 cm cm
-3 under no stress, stress and severe stress conditions, respectively. From I1 to I2, the maximum rate of decrease in RLD was observed under PL 6, however, the highest decrease of 63% from I2 to I3 was noticed under Asha variety. The highest RLD was observed in I1 for Asha (0.33 cm cm
-3) and the lowest in I4 under Subrata (0.07 cm cm
-3). An asymptotic relationship between the RLD and RLWC of lentil crop (Fig 3) indicating that plants can tolerate drought stress, because of expanded rooting system and better water uptake. In an experiment with chickpea,
Lokhande et al., (2019) also found that the drought tolerant cultivars which retained higher root length and biomass, exploited the reduced water levels in a more efficient manner.
Root surface area and root volume
Root surface area and root volume are the water absorption sites, important for water stress condition (Hsiao and Xu, 2000). In this study, root surface area and root volume followed the same trend where I1 showed maximum values, followed by I2, I3 and I4, respectively (Fig 4 and 5). With the severity of water stress both root surface area and root volume were decreased and the rate of decrease was observed the highest from I2 to I3. Asha and Subrata produced better root volume and surface area than other varieties. In I1 regime, Asha and Subrata showed the highest whereas Ranjan being the least for both the parameters.
Average root diameter
Root diameter determines the strength of penetration through soil and influences net ion influx. Under no stress treatment average root diameter were maximum for all the varieties (Fig 6) with the highest with Subrata (0.68 mm). Plants with higher root diameter have more growth potential as it has direct relation with water absorption
(Bao et al., 2014). From I1 to I2 and I2 to I3 root diameter decreased in case of Asha, Subrata and Ranjan. An increase of average root diameter from I3 to I4 for all the varieties except Subrata was observed and this may be due to more pressure needed to penetrate by enlarging root diameter. Ranjan (0.64 mm) and PL 6 (0.10 mm) were noticed to have maximum average root diameter among other lentil varieties for I2 and I3, respectively. In severe stress condition the highest value of average root diameter was observed under Ranjan (0.08 mm).