Maximum plant height (480.50 cm) was recorded in the treatment S
3T
4 (60 × 45 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray) and least plant height (378.67 cm) was recorded in S
1T
3 (60 × 75 cm spacing with 33: 52.5: 39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1) which is presented in Table 1. This was due to the greater inter plant competition for space and light, thereby forcing the plants to grow taller. Higher plant height at narrow spacing could be explained by the fact that, when the plants are sown closely, their stems are shaded from light resulting in accumulation of auxin (growth hormone) that stimulates cell division and elongation of internodes, thereby increases height. Whereas in widely spaced plants, auxin destruction by light occurs resulting in plants being shorter. This was evident by
Satodiya et al., (2015) and
Asaye et al., (2018). The application of optimum nutrients required for the plants along with mulching, facilitates the optimum moisture content, promotes not only microbial activity in the soil, but also avoid the leaching of soil whereas, the foliar application of micronutrient spray increases the metabolic activity in the plant. The above all factors are responsible for the maximum plant height. These findings were in conformity with
Kalanjiya and Manickam (2015),
Prabu et al., (2016), Sahana et al., (2018).
Maximum number of primary and secondary branches were recorded in treatment 60 × 75 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 (8.70 and 8.50) whereas, the least were recorded in 60 × 45 cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray (4.27 and 4.50) respectively. The treatment combination (60 × 75 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1), mulching and foliar application of micronutrient spray has recorded the maximum number of branches which is presented in Table 1. The maximum number of branches recorded in the wider spacing due to the less plant density and more horizontal space among the plant which facilitates the lateral spread of the plant. As the plant density decreases, there will be more interception of sunlight for photosynthesis, which results in the accumulation of photosynthates for partitioning towards the development of more branches. This was observed by
Manjesh et al., (2019) and
Melak (2018). The continuous supply of irrigation water and fertigation directly to the root zone which increases the fertilizer use efficiency with optimum maintenance of moisture content and less weed incidence. The spray of micronutrients to the plants at different stages of plant growth increases the rate of photosynthesis and photosynthates, which in turn increased the number of branches. These results were in line with the findings of
Mostafa et al., (2014) and
Sahana et al., (2018).
Highest number of pods plant
-1 (220.20), pod length (20.66 cm) and pod girth (2.95 cm) were recorded in the treatment 60 × 75 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray whereas, the least (160.33, 15.61 cm and 1.75 cm) was recorded in 60 × 45 cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray respectively (Table 2). The reason for enhanced yield attributes might be due to availability of favourable conditions,
i.e., moisture, light, nutrients and less inter-plant competition, in wider spacing resulting in increased uptake of more nutrients and build-up of sufficient photosynthates which enabled the increased size of pods (length and girth). Similar findings were recorded by,
Manjesh et al., (2019) and
Melak (2018). The nutrient supplied through fertigation throughout the growth period with split doses might ave increased nutrient uptake, ultimately leading to greater photosynthetic rate and metabolic activities. Mulching helped in weed control, less weed competition for nutrient uptake and optimum soil temperature which could have enhanced the accumulation of the metabolites. The above all reasons are responsible for the increased yield attributing characters of the crop. This was evident by
Wondimu and Tana (2017) and
Sahana et al., (2018).
Maximum pod yield plant
-1(4.65 kg) was recorded in the treatment 60 × 75 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray whereas, the least (3.04 kg) was recorded in 60 × 45 cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray respectively (Table 3). This could be due to congenial environment required for the plants with wider spacing and optimum fertilizer dosage required for the plant along with mulching and micronutrient spray in the split dose throughout the crop duration which facilitates less competition for nutrients, moistures, fertilizer use efficiency and the light interception will be good in the plant canopy. These results are in conformity with
Hussein et al., (2018). The maximum pod yield 1000 m
-2 13.06 t) was recorded in the treatment 60 × 45 cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha-1+ mulching + micronutrient spray whereas, the least (9.28 t) was recorded in 60 × 75 cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1. As the plant population is high at wider spacing and the area is supplied with water soluble fertilizers, along with mulching and micronutrient spray in split dose throughout the crop duration the water and fertilizer use efficiency was high, which is the reason for high yield. The similar result findings reported by
Assinapol et al., (2017), Jeevitha et al., (2017), Manjesh et al., (2019), Muhammad et al., (2017) and
Hussein et al., (2018).
An appraisal of data presented in (Fig 1.) revealed that treatment combination 60 × 45cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray accrued maximum net realization (Rs. 1,28,661.1) whereas the lowest net realization (Rs.72,516.74) was recorded in the treatment 60 × 75cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1. The (Fig 2.) revealed that treatment combination 60 × 45cm spacing with 44:70:53 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1 + mulching + micronutrient spray resulted highest B:C value of Rs. 2.48 and lowest B:C value of Rs. 1.89 was recorded in the treatment 60 × 75 cm spacing with 33:52.5:39.75 kg of N:P:K kg ha
-1. The higher B:C value might be due to higher total green pod yield and the gross return of French bean recorded in treatment combination with closer spacing, fertigation, mulching and micronutrients spray. This was in close conformity with the findings of
Deka et al., (2015) and
Manjesh et al., (2019).