Generation of inter and intra-specific hybrids and crossability studies
Since the main objective of the present study was to incorporate earliness and determinate habit into
Vigna umbellatta; the donor parents used were genotypes from
Vigna mungo and
Vigna angularis. Thus, crosses of six genotypes of
Vigna umbellate (RBHP-36, RBHP-38, RBHP-43, RBHP-61, RBHP-107 and RBHP-108) with
Vigna mungo (Him Mash-1 and Palampur-93) and
Vigna angularis (HPU-51) were attempted with the objective to transfer genes for earliness and determinate trait, under glasshouse conditions in the year 2015.
The crossability percentage (Table 3a and 3b) ranged from 0-4%. In the present study the crossability was possible only among the genotypes of
Vigna umbellata and
Vigna mungo. Differences in percentage of pods harvested were highly significant among the crosses indicating presence of reproductive barriers that renders introgression difficult
(Thiyagu et al., 2008). The cross combinations RBHP-36 × Him Mash-1, RBHP-107 × Him Mash-1 and RBHP-108 × Him Mash-1 resulted in highest pod set percentage. It was observed that pod set percentage was maximum when ricebean was used as female parent as compared to the crosses where urdbean was used as female parent. In most of the cross combination the pod set percentage was 0% when urdbean was taken as female. In remaining crosses the pods developed normally but the seeds obtained were wrinkled.
The F
1’s showed very low percentage of seed germination (Table 4) ranging from 20 to 42.85 per cent. The germination percentage was recorded highest one in the cross RBHP-61 × Palampur-93 (42.85%) while lowest one in the cross Palampur-93 × RBHP-38 (20%).
Reciprocal crosses among
Vigna umbellata and
Vigna mungo showed lowest pod set percentage ranging from 0 to 3 per cent. The reciprocal difference in crossability between ricebean and urdbean suggests interaction between genic and cytoplasmic factors (
Stebbins, 1958). This interaction may be the cause of hybrid embryo degeneration when
Vigna mungo is used as the female parent (
Ahn and Hartmann, 1977). There are no external barriers, which prevent cross-pollination between
Vigna umbellata and
Vigna mungo because the timing of anthesis, dehiscence of anthers and receptivity of the stigma are identical for both the parental species. Absence of seed set and abscission of crossed flowers within four days from pollination in crosses
Vigna mungo ×
Vigna umbellata indicates that complete sterility is the result of delay in pollen tube entry into the ovule. This may be due to difference in length of style of
Vigna umbellata and
Vigna mungo which leads to inability of pollen tube to germinate and penetrate stigma and style (
Chowdhury and Chowdhury, 1977) and ovary
(Gopinathan et al., 1986) and slow rate of pollen growth
(Thiyagu et al., 2008). These factors are reported to be significant pre-fertilization barriers.
The failure of endosperm nuclei to divide or the delayed endosperm nuclear divisions are responsible for abortion of embryo and the subsequent abscission of young fruits in the interspecific crosses. The production of shrivelled seeds from these crosses is probably associated with the failure of embryo to reach maturity. Such sterility barriers have also been recorded in the interspecific crosses between
Vigna radiata ×
Vigna umbellata by
Bharathi et al., 2006.
Inter-specific hybridization possesses the presence of pre-fertilization barriers confirmed by the frequency of pod set and post-fertilization barriers as F
1’s exhibited reduced germination and sterility. The frequency of inter-specific hybridization and radical and plant production percentage revealed the genotype specific response of both the species (
Shayla, 2016). Thus, recovery of desirable recombinants is reduced, as hybrids exhibit varying levels of sterility
(Rashid et al., 2013), inviability, lethality and genotype specific response
(Dhiman et al., 2013). These different kinds of pre and post fertilization barriers are also responsible for complete sterility to low fertility in the back crosses involving the F
1 hybrid and both its parents.
Confirmation of inter-specific hybrids through SSR markers
Out of 70 SSR markers used for parental polymorphism survey, 8 were found polymorphic between different parents for inter-specific hybrids. These polymorphic markers were used for F
1 hybrid confirmation. F
1 hybrids were confirmed using two primer pairs namely CEDG043 and CEDG037 polymorphic between parents and hybrids. Both these primers showed robust and reproducible bands as shown in Plate 1. All the inter-specific hybrids were true hybrids as confirmed by molecular marker analysis. Similar result was observed by
Chaisan et al., (2013) who confirmed hybridity of inter-specific hybrids between mungbean and ricebean. They screened forty random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers for polymorphism among the parents and finally choose two specific primers for testing of hybridity. All putative F
1 hybrids were confirmed as the inter-specific hybrids. To observe their fertility, some of the hybrid seedlings were transplanted. The hybrid produced flowers profusely but failed to set pods. To overcome the sterility, plants were induced to become tetraploid by colchicine treatment
in vitro.
Nandini et al., (2020) also used SSR markers to detect water use efficiency in parental lines. Similarly Prine
Lekhie et al., (2018) also attempted interspecific hybridization in
Vigna radiata and
V. mungo genotypes. The purity of hybrids were tested through microsatellite markers. All the F1 plants gave resistant reaction to mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) indicating the introgression of resistance gene(s) from
V. mungo to
V. radiata.
Sterlity in inter-specific crosses is the result of various pre and post fertilization barriers (
Nishant Bhanu et al., 2018). Though very little success has been achieved till date in this field but it is necessary to create a wide genetic variation for breeding programs through interspecific hybridization specially in the crops like ricebean where genetic variability is low but the production potential is very high. Alternative methods like embryo rescue, ovary and ovule culture and chromosome doubling holds considerable promise for the development of new cultivars incorporating genes from wide species.