Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 44 issue 8 (august 2021) : 952-955

Additional Income Generation from Cultivation of Summer Mungbean in Rice-Wheat System of Haryana

D.P. Malik1,*, D.K. Bishnoi1, Neeraj Pawar1, Nirmal Kumar1, Sumit1
1Department of Agricultural Economics, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.
  • Submitted04-10-2019|

  • Accepted14-03-2020|

  • First Online 22-08-2020|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4253

Cite article:- Malik D.P., Bishnoi D.K., Pawar Neeraj, Kumar Nirmal, Sumit (2021). Additional Income Generation from Cultivation of Summer Mungbean in Rice-Wheat System of Haryana . Legume Research. 44(8): 952-955. doi: 10.18805/LR-4253.
Background: Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek], also known as green gram is cultivated on area of 4.75 million ha in kharif and rabi/ spring seasons as monocrop or intercrop in India. It serves as a major source of dietary protein for the vast majority of vegetarian people in the country. Mungbean contributed 10.03 per cent of total pulses production (23.40 million tonnes) in the country with productivity level of 494 kg ha-1 in 2018-19. The pulses cultivation in Haryana is almost eliminated in kharif season owing to deviation of area towards cotton, cluster bean and pearlmillet because of low profitability. However, the new window opens for cultivation of mungbean in rice-wheat cropping system in summer season to generate additional farm income and to improve soil health. The area under summer mungbean in state was around 64 thousand ha with the production of 50 thousand tonnes and the average productivity of 780 kg/ha during 2017-18. Although rice-wheat system provides better farm returns, but it has imposed threat to soil health, availability and contamination of ground water, weed and biotic stress management. 

Methods: The data  pertains to costs and returns from  summer mungbean cultivation was gathered from  60 mungbean cultivators of Hisar, Kurukshetra and Panipat districts of Haryana having adequate irrigation water availability adopting personal interaction approach in 2018-19. Simple budgeting technique was employed to draw practical implications which ultimately help to take favourable policy decisions for enhancing acreage of summer mungbean.

Result: The inquiry profound that mungbean cultivation in summer season particularly in rice-wheat was established as additional income generation farm enterprise. The net benefits accrued from short duration varieties of mungbean over variable cost was Rs. 31831 ha-1  with time span of 60-70 days by utilizing fallow land in summer season. The B-C ratio toiled considering expenses incurred on variable resources with value of 2.99 divulges economic viability of mungbean cultivation in the study area. It is imperative from results that cultivation of short duration cultivars of mungbean is viable option to enhance farm income, restoration of diminishing soil fertility owing to adoption of continuous rice-wheat rotation by inherent characteristics of converting atmospheric nitrogen. Distinctive efforts are essential to evolve mungbean cultivars suitable to prevailing cropping system in Haryana and assure market procurement. The exploration of mungbean cultivation will reduce dependency on import and improve net availability of pulses in India.
Pulses are important for nutritional security and for alleviating malnutrition among the poor masses in India. These provide energy, dietary fiber, protein, minerals and vitamins required for human health. Pulses, by contributing about 10 per cent in the daily protein intake and 5 per cent in energy intake, are of particular importance for food security in low income countries like India, where the major sources of proteins are non-animal products and large population is vegetarian. In addition, pulses also contain significant amounts of other essential nutrients like calcium, iron and lysine (Gowda et al., 2013). Therefore, pulses are included in all “food baskets” and dietary guidelines. Recent research studies suggested that consumption of pulses may have potential health benefits by reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension and gastrointestinal disorders (Jacobs and Gallaher, 2004).
 
The top five states, i.e. Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh shared over 75 per cent of total pulses production. Madhya Pradesh is the highest pulse-producing state (3.2 million tonnes/annum) followed by Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. In terms of productivity, Haryana has the highest yield of 824 kg ha-1 followed by Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar (Gowda et al., 2013).
 
Per cent share of pulses to total food-grain basket in the country in terms of area and production was 19.62 and 16.55 per cent, respectively in1950-51 and continued till 1960-61 and it started declining after inception of green revolution due to no break-through in production technology of pulses in comparison to other commodities of food grains. Deceleration of contribution of pulses to total food grains has prompted vigorously in the country to pursue pulses as one of component of NFSM in 12th Plan to focus on cultivation of pulses in rainfed and rice fallow areas as well as adoption of improved production technologies coupled steep rise in MSP and procurement arrangement.
 
In Haryana, the continuous increase in area under rice and wheat due to expanded irrigation facilities has created imbalance in cropping pattern and resulted into nearly elimination of pulses from the cropping system in irrigated conditions. The area under pulses in state condensed to 0.75 lakh ha and pushed to poor fertility and rain-fed areas due to low yield and absence of adequate production/ protection technologies.
 
No doubt, rice-wheat system yields better farm returns, but it has imposed threat to soil health, contamination of ground water, weed infestation, occurrence of biotic stresses. At present, about 13 lakh ha area is cultivated under rice-wheat system with assured irrigation facilities. However, the area remains fallow during summer season in the state and provides space for cultivation of short duration pulses like mungbean. Keeping in view above stated facts, the present study was attempted with objective to analyse the status and economic profitability of mungbean cultivation in summer season in the state.
The present study was confined to one district (Hisar) from western zone and two districts (Kurukshetra and Panipat) from eastern zone of Haryana state. From each district, three villages were selected randomly. Further, 20 cultivators were selected randomly from each selected district from the list of mungbean growers incentivized by State Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare and Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) of CCS Haryana Agricultural University. The relevant information pertaining to various resources like seed, farm machinery, human labour, farm operations etc were extracted from mungbean cultivators through personal interaction. Compound annual growth rate (CAGR), simple budgeting techniques and descriptive analysis were employed to draw valid inferences from the information collated.
Area coverage under mungbean
 
The share of summer mungbean to total pulses in the state in terms of area and production was 30.81 and 23.99 per cent, respectively during 2013-14 (Table 1). After this, area and production of total pulses started decline and this trend continued till 2016-17. During 2017-18, contribution of area and production of summer mungbean was 83.12 and 84.99 per cent to the total pulses, respectively. The total acreage under pulses decreased during time period of 2013-14 to 2017-18. The growth rate for area and production of total pulses were estimated to be negative i.e. -12.63 and -11.34 per cent, respectively while in case of summer mungbean, both values were found positive. This reflects that there is good potential for cultivation of summer mungbean in rice-wheat system having area of around 13-14 lakh ha in the state. The only way to compensate decline in acreage under pulses in the state is by promoting the cultivation of pulses in summer season. It is also required special attention for brining large area under cultivation of mungbean in summer season not only to utilize fallow areas but also supplement additional quantity of pulses to meet the ever rising demand of pulses in the country.
 

Table 1: Contribution of summer mungbean to total pulses in Haryana.


 
Economics of summer mungbean cultivation
 
The cost and returns analysis is important for promotion and adoption of crop enterprise. The cultivators come forward for adoption of new farm enterprise after analysing its profitability and do allocation of scarce farm resources accordingly. Besides, planting time and impact on succeeding crop, potential, duration and accessibility of quality seed of improved cultivars, technologies, irrigation water availability, procurement arrangement, market price, weather conditions etc. are also considered for enchanting appropriate decision to cultivate new farm enterprise. Therefore, the economic analysis of farm enterprise play an important role for replacing/inclusion of farm enterprise in existing cropping systems adopted at the farm. The short duration (60-70 days) varieties of mungbean like SML 668 and MH-421are cultivated during summer season. The planting time of mungbean start from end of March to Last week of April and it is harvested in first fortnight of June. Its planting is mostly done residual moisture or with light irrigation.
       
The per hectare total cost calculated on prevailing market prices of various inputs used in cultivation of  summer mungbean in Haryana during 2018 workout to be × 43975 (Table 2). The harvesting and thrashing charges contributed 12.62 per cent of total cost in the state followed by field preparation (8.55%) and irrigation (6.35%). The cost of harvesting and threshing operation can be reduced to large extent by providing suitable machines at affordable price. The variable expenses incurred in cultivation of summer mungbean were around 36 per cent of total cost. While in case of fixed cost, highest contribution derived from rental value of land (54.96%) followed by management and  risk factors (7.08%) and transportation cost (1.49%) out of total cost. These results are in agreement with the findings of Grover and Singh (2015), Sekhon et al., (2007), Angadi and Patil (2018) and Islam et al., (2011).
 

Table 2: Cost of cultivation of summer mungbean in Haryana (Rs./ha).


       
The share of rental value of land in total cost may be due to cultivation of crop on fertile land with assured irrigation facilities. However, there is no application of chemical fertilizers as summer mungbean fulfils the nutrient requirement having nitrogen fixation characteristic being legume crop and available unused nutrients in field. The crop was harvested by applying two light irrigations during crop season of 65-70 days.  The crop is not much affected by biotic stresses due to hot conditions and uses of one/two sprays of pesticides protect the crop. Sometimes, early precipitation at maturity stage of crop resulted into sharp reduction in the yield and farmers ploughed the crop in the field for green manuring.
 
Returns from cultivation of summer mungbean
 
The income generated from cultivation of farm enterprise is strong yardstick to take decision for its cultivation. The income accrued from cultivation of mungbean is considered as additional income from the same field by utilizing fallow land in summer season rather than replacing the existing crop enterprises. The yield of summer mungbean was realised in range of 10.58 to 11.50 quintals ha-1 with average yield of 11.14 quintals ha-1 in the state. The per hectare gross returns (gross returns only include pod yield  and by-product was used as green manure and incorptated into the field) from summer mungbean attained in state were Rs. 47874 with returns over variable cost of Rs. 31831 (Table 3). There is not much difference in potentiality of crop harvested in different areas of state as quality of seed and agronomic practices followed were almost similar.
 

Table 3: Returns from cultivation of summer mungbean in Haryana (Rs./ha).


       
The cost of production was nearly equal in different regions of the state as inputs used in cultivation of summer mungbean exhibited similar pattern. The net returns worked out from cultivation of summer mungean were Rs. 3899 in the state. The value of B: C ratio over variable and total cost was estimated 2.99 and 1.09, respectively  indicates the economic viability of summer mungbean cultivation in the state. The value of B: C ratio over total cost was low  as  rental value of land was  taken into account. Most of farmers will not  cultivate land in summer season and  keep  as fallow and land  rent is spliited into wheat and paddy only. The additional income from mungbean cultivation is genereated from utilization of fallow land in summer season. Similar outcome were also found by Puniya et al., (2018), Islam et al., (2007) and Miah et al., (2005) in their respective studies.
It is concluded from the aforesaid discussion that after the harvest of wheat and before the transplanting of rice, the land remains fallow for 65-70 days (April to June). This period could be used to raise a catch crop of summer mungbean. The early emergence of even one day is highly beneficial in this short duration crop. This means mechanization can enable us for timely sowing by which we can earn more through reducing cost of cultivation. It also fixes nitrogen in the soil, requires less irrigation and helps maintain soil fertility and texture. Adding mungbean to the cereal cropping system has the potential to increase farm income, improve soil health and promote sustainability of agriculture on long-term basis. The growth rate for area and production of total pulses were estimated to be negative i.e. -12.63 and -11.34 per cent, respectively while in case of summer mungbean, it showed positive sign. The rnungbean production in the study areas is profitable, because B: C ratio over variable cost is 2.99 and picking of pods was not required as both the varieties (SML 668 and MH-421) have synchronous maturity. The farmers reported that the yield of succeeding rice crop was higher as mungbean helps to improve soil fertlity.
 
Munghean farmers received higher return from investment. The value of B:C ratio  indicates that  summer mungbean cultivation is economically viable option. It has a vital potential in increasing the farmers income and also helps in improve the soil fertility status by adding the atmospheric nitrogen in soils. 

  1. Angadi, S. and Patil, B.L. (2018). Economics of cost of cultivation of greengram in Gadag district of Karnataka. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(3): 1206-1210.

  2. Gowda, C.L.L., Srinivasan, S., Gaur, P.M. and Saxena, K.B. (2013). Enhancing the productivity and production of pulses in India. In: Climate Change and Sustainable Food Security, [Shetty P K, Ayyappan S and Swaminathan M S (eds.)], National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. Pp 63-76.

  3. Grover, D.K. and Singh J.M. (2015). Fiscal viability of pulses cultivation in Punjab: An economic analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(5): 392-399.

  4. Islam, Q.M.S., Miah, M.A.M. and Alam, Q.M. (2007). Productivity and profitability of mungbean cultivation in selected Areas of Bangladesh. Annual Report of the Agricultural Economics Division, BARI, Joydebpur: 94-100.

  5. Islam, Q.M.S., Rahman, M.S., Hossain, M.A. and Hossain, M.S. (2011). Economic analysis of mungbean (Vigna radiata) cultivation in some coastal areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(1): 29-40.

  6. Jacobs, D.R. and Gallaher, D.D. (2004). Whole grain intake and cardiovascular disease: A review. Current Atheroscler. 6: 415-23.

  7. Miah M.A.M., Hasan, M.K. and Akter, M.S. (2005). Comparative economic performance of improved pulse production in Bangladesh: Technical efficiency and related issues. The Agriculturists. 3(1 and 2): 104-116.

  8. Puniya, R., Palsaniya, S., Chand, L., Sharma, A., Thakur, N.P. and Bazaya, B.R. (2018). Influence of sowing dates and varieties on the yield, heat use efficiency, energy utilization and economics of summer mungbean. Legume Research. 41(5): 710-715.

  9. Sekhon, H.S., Bains, T.S., Kooner, B.S. and Sharma, P. (2007). Grow summer mungbean for improving crop sustainability, farm income and malnutrition. Acta Horticulturae. 752: 459-464.

Editorial Board

View all (0)