Area coverage under mungbean
The share of summer mungbean to total pulses in the state in terms of area and production was 30.81 and 23.99 per cent, respectively during 2013-14 (Table 1). After this, area and production of total pulses started decline and this trend continued till 2016-17. During 2017-18, contribution of area and production of summer mungbean was 83.12 and 84.99 per cent to the total pulses, respectively. The total acreage under pulses decreased during time period of 2013-14 to 2017-18. The growth rate for area and production of total pulses were estimated to be negative
i.e. -12.63 and -11.34 per cent, respectively while in case of summer mungbean, both values were found positive. This reflects that there is good potential for cultivation of summer mungbean in rice-wheat system having area of around 13-14 lakh ha in the state. The only way to compensate decline in acreage under pulses in the state is by promoting the cultivation of pulses in summer season. It is also required special attention for brining large area under cultivation of mungbean in summer season not only to utilize fallow areas but also supplement additional quantity of pulses to meet the ever rising demand of pulses in the country.
Economics of summer mungbean cultivation
The cost and returns analysis is important for promotion and adoption of crop enterprise. The cultivators come forward for adoption of new farm enterprise after analysing its profitability and do allocation of scarce farm resources accordingly. Besides, planting time and impact on succeeding crop, potential, duration and accessibility of quality seed of improved cultivars, technologies, irrigation water availability, procurement arrangement, market price, weather conditions etc. are also considered for enchanting appropriate decision to cultivate new farm enterprise. Therefore, the economic analysis of farm enterprise play an important role for replacing/inclusion of farm enterprise in existing cropping systems adopted at the farm. The short duration (60-70 days) varieties of mungbean like SML 668 and MH-421are cultivated during summer season. The planting time of mungbean start from end of March to Last week of April and it is harvested in first fortnight of June. Its planting is mostly done residual moisture or with light irrigation.
The per hectare total cost calculated on prevailing market prices of various inputs used in cultivation of summer mungbean in Haryana during 2018 workout to be × 43975 (Table 2). The harvesting and thrashing charges contributed 12.62 per cent of total cost in the state followed by field preparation (8.55%) and irrigation (6.35%). The cost of harvesting and threshing operation can be reduced to large extent by providing suitable machines at affordable price. The variable expenses incurred in cultivation of summer mungbean were around 36 per cent of total cost. While in case of fixed cost, highest contribution derived from rental value of land (54.96%) followed by management and risk factors (7.08%) and transportation cost (1.49%) out of total cost. These results are in agreement with the findings of Grover and Singh (2015),
Sekhon et al., (2007), Angadi and Patil (2018) and
Islam et al., (2011).
The share of rental value of land in total cost may be due to cultivation of crop on fertile land with assured irrigation facilities. However, there is no application of chemical fertilizers as summer mungbean fulfils the nutrient requirement having nitrogen fixation characteristic being legume crop and available unused nutrients in field. The crop was harvested by applying two light irrigations during crop season of 65-70 days. The crop is not much affected by biotic stresses due to hot conditions and uses of one/two sprays of pesticides protect the crop. Sometimes, early precipitation at maturity stage of crop resulted into sharp reduction in the yield and farmers ploughed the crop in the field for green manuring.
Returns from cultivation of summer mungbean
The income generated from cultivation of farm enterprise is strong yardstick to take decision for its cultivation. The income accrued from cultivation of mungbean is considered as additional income from the same field by utilizing fallow land in summer season rather than replacing the existing crop enterprises. The yield of summer mungbean was realised in range of 10.58 to 11.50 quintals ha
-1 with average yield of 11.14 quintals ha
-1 in the state. The per hectare gross returns (gross returns only include pod yield and by-product was used as green manure and incorptated into the field) from summer mungbean attained in state were Rs. 47874 with returns over variable cost of Rs. 31831 (Table 3). There is not much difference in potentiality of crop harvested in different areas of state as quality of seed and agronomic practices followed were almost similar.
The cost of production was nearly equal in different regions of the state as inputs used in cultivation of summer mungbean exhibited similar pattern. The net returns worked out from cultivation of summer mungean were Rs. 3899 in the state. The value of B: C ratio over variable and total cost was estimated 2.99 and 1.09, respectively indicates the economic viability of summer mungbean cultivation in the state. The value of B: C ratio over total cost was low as rental value of land was taken into account. Most of farmers will not cultivate land in summer season and keep as fallow and land rent is spliited into wheat and paddy only. The additional income from mungbean cultivation is genereated from utilization of fallow land in summer season. Similar outcome were also found by
Puniya et al., (2018), Islam et al., (2007) and
Miah et al., (2005) in their respective studies.