Analysis of variance for parents (27 lines and two testers) and their hybrids revealed highly significant genotypic differences for all the traits namely days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, plant height (cm), branches per plant, pod length (cm), pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed yield per plant (g), biological yield per plant (g), 100-seed weight, harvest index (%) and protein content (%) indicating substantial amount of genetic variability in the material under study (Table 1). Hence, it offers a better scope for further improvement of breeding material by the selection of promising genotypes in blackgram breeding programme. The significant variation for all the traits was also observed by earlier workers
viz.,
Kumar et al., (2017) for seed yield, number of branches, pods, clusters, 100-seed weight, fodder biomass and harvest index;
Chauhan et al., (2018) for all studied traits;
Bandi et al., (2018) for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of branches per plant, number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, pod length (cm), number of seeds per pod, 100-seed weight (g) and grain yield per plant (g) in blackgram.
Analysis of variance for combining ability
Analysis of variance for combining ability (Table 2) revealed that mean squares due to crosses were highly significant (P≤ 0.01) for all the traits under study. Similar results were observed by
Patial et al., (2018). One should proceed for line × tester analysis only if the crosses mean squares are significant. The further partitioning of mean squares into lines, testers and line × tester interactions revealed that mean squares due to lines were highly significant (P≤0.01) for all the traits
viz., days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, plant height (cm), branches per plant, pod length (cm), pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed yield per plant (g), biological yield per plant (g), 100-seed weight, harvest index (%) and protein content (%). The mean squares due to testers were significant for days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity, branches per plant, pod length (cm), pods per plant, seeds per pod, seeds yield per plant (g), biological yield per plant (g) and harvest index (%). Highly significant mean squares for lines and testers indicated existence of additive variance. The lines exhibited greater magnitude of mean squares as compared to testers for all the traits except, for three traits
viz., days to 50% flowering, days to 75% maturity and pod length. This indicated a wider genetic diversity of lines as compared to the testers for these traits. This observation was in agreement with the findings of
Chakraborty et al., (2010) and
Surashe et al., (2017).
Genetic parameters and proportional contribution of lines, testers and their interactions
In a breeding programme, once the appropriate parents and potential crosses are identified, the next important step is to adopt a suitable breeding strategy for the management of generated variability which largely depends upon type of gene action in the population for the traits under genetic improvement (
Cockerham 1961;
Sprauge 1966). The estimates of additive variances (σ2A), dominance variances (σ
2D) and proportional contribution of lines, testers and their interactions to the total variances are presented in Table 3. Magnitude of dominance variance (σ
2D) was found to be higher than additive variance (σ
2A) for all the traits, which indicated the preponderance of non-additive gene action for these traits.
Gill et al., (2014) found that the relative estimates of dominance variance were higher than additive variance for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height and number of pods per plant. The average degree of dominance more than unity reveal over dominance confirming the above findings. Hence, non-additive genetic variance was important in controlling these traits. Similar results were reported by
Govindaraj and Subramanian (2001),
Manivannan (2002),
Selvam and Elangaimannan (2010),
Chakraborty et al., (2010) and
Thamodharan et al., (2017) for plant height, branches per plant, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, cluster per plant, pods per cluster, 100-seed weight and pod length. Narrow sense heritability is the proportion of additive genetic variance to total phenotypic variance. The narrow sense heritability (h
2ns) estimates were classified as high (>50%), medium (30-50%) and low (<30%). All the traits showed low narrow-sense heritability, indicating that non-fixable component of variation is governing by these traits (Table 3).
The proportional contribution of lines ranged from 34.31% (days to 50% flowering) to 74.34% (seed yield per plant). The proportional contribution of testers ranged from 0.33% (biological yield per plant) to 9.63% (days to 75% maturity) (Table 3). The proportional contribution of line × tester interactions ranged from 22.31% (seed yield per plant) to 62.65% (100 seed weight). The contribution of lines was found to be higher than individual contribution of testers for all the traits studied. This indicated the presence of wide genetic diversity among the lines as compared to the testers. The contribution of line × tester interaction was found to be higher than the individual contribution of testers for all the traits studied, indicating the higher estimates of variances due to specific combining ability which further confirmed the active involvement of non-additive gene action in the inheritance of different traits studied. The per cent contributions of lines, testers and their interactions to the total variance of various quantitative traits in the blackgram crosses were estimated by
Chakraborty et al., (2010).
General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA)
The GCA and SCA effects of lines and testers are presented in Table 4 and 5. The GCA effects is a good estimates of additive gene action (
Sprague and Tatum, 1942) reflecting the performance of parental lines in combination with all other lines. Estimates of the general combining ability (GCA) effect (Table 4) for the lines and testers for the traits indicated that no single parent was a good general combiner for all traits under study. However, line IC-436910 (11.55**), IC-281989 (7.71**), IC-398973 (4.86**), IC-413307 (2.11**), IC-413306 (1.44**), IC-343885 (1.34**), IC-436852 (0.93**) and IC-413305 (0.88**) were found to be good general combiners for seed yield per plant. The parental lines IC-436910 (2.30**), IC-343943 (2.27**), IC-398973 (2.24**), IC-343885 (2.11**), IC-413306 (1.99**) and IC-281995 (1.05*) were best general combiners for protein content.
Earliness is an important breeding objective. Because negative heterosis is required to achieve earliness, lines IC-436852 (-3.45**, -3.06**), IC-343947 (-2.62**, -2.72**), IC-282008 (-3.12**, -3.22*) exhibited significant GCA values for days to 50% flowering and days to 75% maturity respectively. Among testers, Him Mash-1 was good general combiner for earliness whereas, HPBU-111 was good general combiner for branches per plant, pod length (cm), pods per plant, seeds per pod, biological yield per plant (g), seed yield per plant (g) and harvest index (%). Overall, IC-436910, IC-413306, IC-398973 and IC-343885 lines were good general combiners for seed yield and other quantitative traits and among these lines, IC-436910 was the best general combiner for maximum number of traits
i.e. days to 75% maturity, plant height, branches per plant, pod length, pods per plant, seeds per pod, biological yield per plant, seed yield per plant and protein content. The GCA effect revealed that in order to synthesize a dynamic population with most of the favorable genes, it will be pertinent to make use of these parents, which are good general combiner for several traits, in a multiple crossing program to obtain desirable transgressive segregants for higher seed yield.
Another important aspect from practical point of view, which needs consideration, is the identification of potential cross combinations for obtaining desirable transgressive segregants with a higher degree of probability. The specific combining ability is the deviation from the performance predicted on the basis of general combining ability (Allard, 1960). The cross combinations with highest SCA effects along with mean performances and GCA effects of parents are listed in Table 5.
The cross combination IC-436910 × HPBU-111 recorded significant positive SCA effects and high
per se performance for days to 75% maturity, plant height, branches per plant and seed yield per plant. The cross IC-281980 × Him Mash-1 recorded significant positive SCA effects for plant height, branches per plant and biological yield per plant. IC-343947 × Him Mash-1 showed significant positive SCA effects for pod length and seeds per pod. For days to 50% flowering and 75% maturity, IC-281995 × Him Mash-1 was found to be highly significant negative SCA effects as well as low mean values indicating early maturity. It was observed that the desirable cross combination included high × high, medium × high, high × low, medium × medium and low × low type of general combiner (Table 5). The high × medium or vice-versa combination could be due to additive and additive × additive types of gene action which are fixable in nature. The desirable performance of cross combination like low × medium, medium × medium general combiners may be ascribed to complimentary gene effects.
Various workers have recorded good general combiners and specific combiners for various traits in blackgram with different genetic material
Gill et al., (2014), Kumar et al., (2014), Gill et al., (2015), Sanjeev et al., (2015), Balouria et al., (2016) and
Thamodharan et al., (2017). Similarly,
Barad et al., (2008), Patil et al., (2011), Nath et al., (2018) reported in mungbean. Hence, the lines and cross-combinations with significant and positive GCA, SCA effects could be utilized for selection of superior segregants for developing improved cultivars in future.