Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 44 issue 10 (october 2021) : 1260-1264

An Economic Analysis of Mung Bean Seed Production Technology in Mau District of Eastern Uttar Pradesh

Govind Pal1,*, Udaya Bhaskar K.1, S.P. Jeevan Kumar1, Sripathy K.V.1, Kalyani Kumari1, D.K. Agarwal1
1ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Mau-275 103, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted20-05-2019|

  • Accepted06-09-2019|

  • First Online 09-11-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4169

Cite article:- Pal Govind, K. Bhaskar Udaya, Kumar Jeevan S.P., K.V. Sripathy, Kumari Kalyani, Agarwal D.K. (2021). An Economic Analysis of Mung Bean Seed Production Technology in Mau District of Eastern Uttar Pradesh . Legume Research. 44(10): 1260-1264. doi: 10.18805/LR-4169.
The present study was based on primary data collected from 50 farmers from Mau district of Uttar Pradesh during the agricultural year 2017-18. The analysis of data shows that the ratio of fixed and variable cost in Mung bean seed production was 18:82. Human labour was the major component of cost (39.69 per cent of total cost) followed by machine labour (15.31 per cent), manures and fertilizers (7.54 per cent), irrigation (6.23 per cent), seed (4.77 per cent), plant protection chemicals (4.54 per cent) and seed certification charges (1.53 per cent). The total cost in seed production of Mung bean was Rs. 38547 per hectare. The gross return and net return was Rs. 56175 and Rs. 17628 per hectare respectively. The BC ratio was 1.46. The total cost of cultivation in Mung bean certified seed production was around 31.29 per cent higher than grain production while, gross return was about 49.80 per cent higher in seed production than grain production. Consequently, net return from seed production of Mung bean was 116.56 per cent higher than grain production. According to cost C2, cost of production of Mung bean grain and seed estimated to Rs. 3915 and Rs. 4591 per quintal. The return to the farmers on cost C2 was 27.71 and 45.72 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed, respectively. Similarly, cost of production according to cost A2 & FL (Family Labour) of Mung bean grain and seed was estimated to be Rs. 3089 and Rs. 3852 per quintal. The return to the farmers on cost A2 & FL was 61.86 and 73.68 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed, respectively. Production of Mung bean seed has resulted in higher profitability proposition for the farmers. The net return from Mung bean seed production was encouraging and the same may be popularized among farmers to increase area under Mung bean seed production and thus to enhance profitability to the farmers and also to ensure increased availability of quality seed to the farmers. 
Seed is the numero uno input for agriculture, which determines the response of all other inputs viz., irrigation, fertilizer and plant protection chemicals etc. In the significant advances that India registered in agriculture in the last few decades, the role of the seed sector has been substantial. A sustained increase in agricultural production and productivity has been dependent on the development of new improved variety, timely and adequate supply of quality seed to the farmers. It is estimated that the direct contribution of quality seed alone to the total production is about 15-20 per cent depending upon the crop and it can be further raised up to 40 per cent with effective management of other inputs (Anonymous, 2007a). A superior quality seed not only increases productivity per unit area, but also helps to produce uniform crops without any admixtures which is important for obtaining high prices in the market.
       
Mung bean is grown on more than 6 million ha worldwide (about 8.5% of global pulse area) and India is the largest producer in the world (https://avrdc.org/). It is one of the important pulse crops of India occupying an area of 4.33 million hectare with the production of 2.17 million tons with an average productivity of 5.01 quintal/ha during 2016 (http://dpd.gov.in/). It is third important pulse crop of India after chickpea and pigeonpea (http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/). Uttar Pradesh is also important Mung bean producing state in the country and it was grown in 0.92 lakhs hectares with production of 0.52 lakhs tons with an average productivity of 5.65 quintal/ha during 2016-17 (https://eands.dacnet. nic.in/). Summer is the main Mung bean growing season in the state (http://upagripardarshi.gov.in/).
 
Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) also known as green gram and native pulse crops of India. It contains 56.6 per cent carbohydrate, 24 per cent protein, 1.3 per cent of fat, mineral (428.4 mg/100 g) and vitamins (2.86 mg/100 g) (Anonymous, 2007b). It is a drought and high temperature tolerant with soil enrichment properties, low input requirement, shallow rooted summer legume crop of high social and economic significance. It is extensively grown in tropical and subtropical Asia because of its wider adaptability (Poehlman, 1991). This crop is suitable for multi-cropping systems because of its fast growth and early maturity, which results in the increase of farmers’ income and improvement of soil fertility (Nsoukpoe-Kossi et al., 1999). However, its large-scale adoption is constrained by low yield potential due to various biotic and abiotic factors (Chotechuen, 1996).

Quality seed production is a specialized activity. The general farm produce retained for seed cannot be substituted for quality seed. Farm saved seed generally lacks genetic vigour and has poor germination (Singh et al., 1990).  Seed of Mung bean has significant share in its cost of cultivation, therefore the economics of Mung bean seed production has impacted both seed producers as well as its users. There are several studies pertaining to economics of Mung bean cultivation for commercial grain production (Samant, 2014; Poonia, 2017, Prem et al., 2017; Angadi and Patil 2018; Jat et al., 2016; Dash and Rautaray, 2017; Dash et al., 2018) and seed production in other crops (Pal et al., 2016a; Pal et al., 2016b and Pal et al., 2016c). But no studies have been made in relation to economics of Mung bean seed production. Considering these facts, the present study was taken with the objectives to study the economics of certified seed production of Mung bean with comparison to grain production.
The study is based on primary data collected from Mau district of Uttar Pradesh. Data and information have been collected through survey from certified seed growers under farmers participatory schemes of Institute (ICAR-Indian Institute of Seed Science, Mau, Uttar Pradesh) to estimate the economics of certified seed production of Mung bean. The list of certified seed growers of Mung bean under farmers participatory scheme has been obtained from the Institute. For comparison study, commercial grain producers of Mung bean were also selected randomly from the villages where farmers participatory scheme is in operation. The total number of selected farmers (commercial grain and certified seed producers of Mung bean) was fifty. The primary data for the study on input used in the grain and seed production of Mung bean and their costs and returns were collected by personal interview with the respondents using a well-structured and pre-tested interview schedule for the agricultural year 2017-18.
       
Institute is implementing farmers’ participatory seed production programme, where a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is signed between farmers and Institute. According to provisions of MoU, participating farmers should have possession of appropriate land (i.e. plain, productive, neutral pH, adept water holding and drainage facility) preferably on road side with irrigation facility and it should meet all land requisition standards as per certification (Indian Minimum Seed Certification Standards- 2013). Seed producer should grow single crop in field, the crop should not be grown as mixed or inter crops. With respect to isolation, inputs used in production process and inter-cultural operations, due care needs to be taken by farmers.  Registration of crop and seed certification charges are to be paid by farmers only. Institute accepts only processed seed and undersize/ rejected seed is returned to farmers. In case of pulse seed production, procurement price of particular crop is 20 per cent higher than Minimum Support Price (MSP) or highest APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) price in intake month, whichever is higher. There is also a provision of 70 per cent advance payment to the farmer on raw seed submitted in the Institute.
 
Cost concepts
 
The cultivation cost of Mung bean (grain and seed) was worked out by using various cost concepts defined below:
 
Cost A1 =   All the variable costs excluding family labour cost and including interest on working capital.
Cost A2 =   Cost A1 + Rent paid for leased in land.
Cost B1 =  Cost A1 + Interest on value of owned fixed capital (other than land).
Cost B2 =  Cost B1 + Rental value of owned land + Rent paid for leased in land.
Cost C1 = Cost B1 + Imputed value of family labour.
Cost C2 = Cost B2 + Imputed value of family labour.
The present analysis on cost of cultivation was worked out on per hectare basis separately for seed and grain production of Mung bean. The item-wise cost of cultivation of seed and grain production of Mung bean has been presented in Table 1. The table reveals that total cost of cultivation in grain and seed production of Mung bean was estimated to be Rs. 29360 and Rs. 38547 per ha. Human labour occupied the major share (41.89 and 39.69 per cent in grain and seed production respectively) of total cost in production of Mung bean. The high human labour requirement in seed production was mainly due to activities like inter-cultural operations, rouging, gap filling etc. The other items involved in production of Mung bean seed was machine labour, cost of seed, manures and fertilizers, plant protection chemicals and seed certification charges.  Variable cost was comparatively higher in seed production (Rs. 31652 per ha) than in grain production (Rs. 22665 per ha).

Table 1: Item-wise cost comparison of seed and grain production in Mung bean (Rs./ha).


       
Cost of cultivation according to various cost concepts has been presented in Table 2 which reveals that all the costs were higher in seed production over grain production in Mung bean. The seed grower has to follow the recommended cultural practices to ensure genetic purity as laid down by the seed certification agency. Seed production plot must be weed free and off-type plants need to be removed. Proper drying and preliminary processing is another special operation in seed production. All these operations required additional labour. Also, certification charges are an additional expense in seed production. Hence, cost of cultivation was higher in seed production as compared to the grain production. The cost Cwas higher by around 31.29 per cent in Mung bean seed production in comparison to grain production. The BC ratio was 1.46 in case of Mung bean seed production as compared to 1.28 in grain production.

Table 2: Costs and returns in Mung bean grain and seed production according to cost concepts and income measures (Rs./ha).


 
Economics of Mung bean certified seed production
 
The cost and returns of certified seed production of Mung bean have been provided in Table 3. The ratio of fixed and variable cost in Mung bean certified seed production was 18:82. Human labour was the major component of cost on inputs applied for seed production in Mung bean. Its share in total costs was about 39.69 per cent. It was followed by machine labour accounting for about 15.31 per cent of the total cost of Mung bean seed production. The share of manures and fertilizers, irrigation, seed cost, plant protection cost and seed certification cost accounted for about 7.54, 6.23, 4.77, 4.54 and 1.53 per cent of total cost of Mung bean seed production. The total cost in certified seed production of Mung bean was Rs. 38547 per hectare. The average yield of Mung bean quality seed and rejected seed was 7.5 quintals and 1.5 quintals, respectively. The gross return and net return was Rs. 56175 and Rs. 17628 per hectare, respectively.

Table 3: Cost and returns in certified seed production of Mung bean (Rs./ha).

 

Comparison in Mung bean grain and certified seed production
 
The total cost of cultivation in Mung bean certified seed production was around 31.29 per cent higher than grain production while, gross return was about 49.80 per cent higher in seed production (Rs. 56175 /ha) than grain production (Rs. 37500/ha). Consequently, net return from seed production of Mung bean was 116.56 per cent (Rs. 17628/ha) higher than grain production (Rs. 8140/ha). Hence, production of certified seed has resulted in win-win situation for the farmers with higher yield and better quality of output. Because of seed production, seed producers fetched higher price than the grain in the marketing of produce. Graphical presentation of cost and return in Mung bean grain and certified seed production has been presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Cost and return in Mung bean grain and certified seed production.



Cost of production and return over cost
 
The cost of cultivation and production according to cost A2 and FL (Family Labour) and C2 have been presented in Table 4. According to cost C2, cost of production of Mung bean grain and seed was estimated to be Rs. 3915 and Rs. 4591 per quintal. The return to the farmers on cost C2 was 27.71 and 45.72 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed, respectively. Similarly, cost of production according to cost A2 and FL of Mung bean grain and seed was estimated to be Rs. 3089 and Rs. 3852 per quintal. The return to the farmers on cost A2 and FL was 61.86 and 73.68 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed, respectively.

Table 4: Cost of production and return over cost in Mung bean cultivation.

 

Partial budgeting
 
The additional costs and returns incurred in the Mung bean certified seed production over grain production has been presented in Table 5. Table reveals that the increment in profit realized in Mung bean certified seed production was Rs. 9488/ha. The cost on human labour, irrigation, manures and fertilizers, plant protection chemicals, seed certification charges etc. mainly contributed to the increase in cost of certified seed production. The added return in Mung bean certified seed production were attributed mainly through the increased productivity in certified seed production and higher price realization of certified seed over grain. It can be concluded from the partial budgeting analysis that the adoption of certified seed production technology would provide an additional profit to the farmers.

Table 5: Partial budgeting of certified seed production in Mung bean.

The analysis shows that the ratio of fixed and variable cost in Mung bean seed production was 18:82. Human labour was the major component of cost (39.69 per cent of total cost). The total cost in seed production of Mung bean was Rs. 38547 per hectare. The gross return and net return was Rs. 56175 and Rs. 17628 per hectare, respectively. The BC ratio was 1.46. The total cost of cultivation in Mung bean certified seed production was around 31.29 per cent higher than grain production while, gross return was about 49.80 per cent higher in seed production than grain production. Consequently, net return from seed production of Mung bean was 116.56 per cent higher than grain production. The return to the farmers on cost C2 was 27.71 and 45.72 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed, respectively. Similarly, cost of production according to cost A2 and FL (Family Labour) of Mung bean grain and seed was estimated to be Rs. 3089 and Rs. 3852 per quintal. The return to the farmers on cost A2 and FL was 61.86 and 73.68 per cent above cost of production for Mung bean grain and seed respectively. Partial budgeting analysis shows that the increment in profit realized in Mung bean certified seed production was Rs. 9488/ha. Production of Mung bean seed has resulted in higher profitability situation for the farmers. The net return from Mung bean seed production was encouraging and the same may be popularized among farmers for higher profitability and income generation.

  1. Angadi, S. and Patil, B. L. (2018). Economics of cost of cultivation of Greengram in Gadag district of Karnataka. Journal of Pharmacognosy    and Phytochemistry. 7(3): 1206-1210. 

  2. Anonymous. (2007 a). DSR- Perspective Plan Vision 2025. ICAR- Directorate of Seed Research, Kushmaur, Mau, UP, India.

  3. Anonymous. (2007 b). Post harvest profile of green gram. Directorate of marketing and inspection, Branch head office, Nagpur. Retrieved from https://agmarknet.gov.in /Others/ Greengram_ profile.pdf

  4. Chotechuen, S. (1996). Breeding of mungbean for resistance to various environmental stresses. In: Mungbean Germplasm: Collection, Evaluation and Utilization for Breeding Program, [Eds P. Srinives, C. Kitbamroong and S. Miyazaki]: Proceedings of the Workshop on Mungbean Germplasm. 52–59. 

  5. Dash, S. R. and Rautaray, B. K. (2017). Growth parameters and yield of green gram varieties (Vigna radiata L.) in East and South East coastal plain of Odisha, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 6 (10): 1517-1523. 

  6. Dash, S. R., Rautaray, B. K. and Dhal, A. (2018). Perception and constraints faced by pulse growers and yield gap analysis of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) in East and South East Coastal Plain of Odisha, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7 (1): 338-346. 

  7. Jat, J. L., Singh, V. and Kumhar, B. L. (2016). Economic analysis and growth indices of different seed rates and varieties of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). International Journal of Advanced Biological Research. 6 (2): 292-295. 

  8. Nsoukpoe-Kossi, C. N., AgIvanov, A. G., Veeranjaneyulu, K. and Leblanc, R. M. (1999). Protective action of abscisic acid against the inhibition of photosynthesis of barley leaves by bisulphate. Photosynthetica. 36: 51–60.

  9. Pal Govind, C Radhika, K Udaya Bhaskar, Ram H and Prasad S Rajendra (2016 a). A study on comparative economics of grain and seed production of groundnut in Karnataka, India. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. 14 (5): 1-9.

  10. Pal Govind, C Radhika, Singh RK, K Udaya Bhaskar, Ram H and Prasad S Rajendra (2016 b). An economic analysis of pigeonpea seed production technology and its adoption behavior: Indian Context. The Scientific World Journal. 2016: 1-7.

  11. Pal Govind, Radhika C, Singh RK, Udaya Bhaskar K, Ram H and Prasad S Rajendra (2016 c). Comparative economics of seed production vis-à-vis grain production of pigeonpea in Karnataka. Legume research. 39 (5): 806-809.

  12. Poehlman, J.M. (1991). The Mungbean. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., New Delhi.

  13. Poonia, A. K. (2017). Economic analysis of green gram production in nagaur district of Rajasthan. (Master’s thesis). Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. Retrieved from https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/87622.

  14. Prem, G., Ahmad, A., Singh, V. D., Kumar, A., Choudhary, R. and Kumar, R. (2017). Growth and yield of summer mungbean (SML-    668) under different sowing methods in Ambala (Haryana). International Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 10 (2): 275-279. 

  15. Samant, T. K. (2014). Evaluation of growth and yield parameters of green gram (Vigna radiata L.). Agriculture Update. 9 (3): 427-430. 

  16. Singh, Gurdev, Asokan, S. R. and Asopa, V. N. (1990). Seed industry in India- A management Perspective. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., New Delhi.

Editorial Board

View all (0)