Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 44 issue 6 (june 2021) : 652-660

Screening of Fluorescent Pseudomonad Isolates Against Sclerotium Rolfsii Sacc., of Soybean (Glycine Max)

Priyanka1, Geeta. Goudar1,*
1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.

  • Submitted01-04-2019|

  • Accepted26-06-2019|

  • First Online 04-10-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4145

Cite article:- Priyanka, Goudar Geeta. (2019). Screening of Fluorescent Pseudomonad Isolates Against Sclerotium Rolfsii Sacc., of Soybean (Glycine Max) . Legume Research. 44(6): 652-660. doi: 10.18805/LR-4145.

ABSTRACT

An attempt was made to isolate and characterize Fluorescent pseudomonads from the rhizosphere soil samples and further screening of the isolates for their antagonistic properties against Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., of soybean. The isolates were subjected for morphological, biochemical and functional characterization. All the isolates exhibited fluorescence under UV light. Cells were rods and gram negative. All the isolates produced clear zone of P- solubilization (TCP) (18.80-21.71mm diameter) on Pikovskaya’s agar medium. The fluorescent pseudomonads produced significantly varying quantities of IAA (19.97 µg to 28.89 µg IAA/25 ml of broth) and GA (18.52 µg per 25 ml broth). All the isolates showed antagonistic activity against Sclerotium rolfsii. The per cent inhibition ranged from 36.85 to 70.37. Under pot culture experiment, lowest PDI was observed in DFP48 followed by DFP47, among the FP isolates. These isolates also showed maximum peroxidase activity and also plant growth promotional activities.

INTRODUCTION

Diseases play a major role in yield reduction in soybean. More than 100 pathogens are known to affect soybean of which 66 fungi, 6 bacteria, 8 viruses and 7 nematodes are involved (Sinclair, 1978). The world loss of more than seven million tonnes per annum was reported only due to diseases alone (Sinclair, 1988).
 
Hence production of this miracle crop is great deal, as it attracts many economically important phytopathogens. These diseases result in heavy losses to the farmers. Synthetic chemical fungicides have long been used to reduce the incidence of plant diseases. However they are costly and can have negative effects on the environment. They may also alter biological balance in the soil by disseminating the non-target and beneficial microorganisms and may induce pathogen resistance to chemical fungicide (Bharathi et al., 2004).  
 
The excessive use of agrochemicals on the other hand has caused serious environmental and health problems. The high intensity of chemical pesticide application has become serious cause of concern in recent years. Although the use of pesticides is comparatively small in India, the damage caused by them to the environment and health is already evident (Alam, 2000). Furthermore, the current trends suggest that the use of chemical fungicides is likely to continue to increase in the near future. Under these circumstances, there is a growing need to promote the use of alternative methods of crop protection. One of the emerging research area for the control of different phytopathogenic agents is the use of biocontrol plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which are capable of suppressing or preventing the phytopathogen damage (Nihorembere et al., 2011).
 
Rhizobacteria that exert beneficial effects on plant growth and development are referred to as plant growth  promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Ashrafuzzaman et al., 2009). PGPR promote plant growth by various factors like ability to produce plant growth regulators, asymbiotic N2 fixation, antagonism against phytopathogenic microorganisms  by  production of siderophores, antibiotics  and  cyanide, solubilization  of mineral phosphates and other nutrients (Sarvanakumar et al., 2007).
 
PGPR may use more than one of above mechanisms  to enhance plant growth as experimental evidence suggests that the plant growth stimulation is the net result of multiple mechanisms that may be activated simultaneously (Martinez et al., 2010). Pseudomonas is a diverse  genus  that  occupies  many different niches and exhibits versatile metabolic  capacity (Clarke, 1982).
 
Fluorescent pseudomonads (FP’s) a group of PGPR, have frequently been considered as effective biological control agents against soil-borne plant pathogens due to their rapid and aggressive colonization of plant roots. They produce secondary metabolites with antibiotic properties such as phytohormones, volatile compounds, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and siderophores. Plant growth-promoting ability of these bacteria is mainly due to the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), siderophores and antibiotics (Lautenberg et al., 2001). Such  strains  can  protect  plants  from  various  soil  borne  pathogens  and/or  stimulate plant growth (Haas and Defago, 2005). The abundance of literature on genus Pseudomonas is due to their elevated metabolic versatility capable of utilizing a wide range of simple and complex organic compounds and holding an important position in biosphere ecology (Scarpellini et al., 2004).

Antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. putida in the rhizosphere has been recognized as major factor in the suppression of many phytopathogens. Bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas comprise a large group of the active biocontrol strains as a result of their general ability to produce a diverse array of potent antifungal metabolites. Strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens are known to show biological control activity against certain soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi and have the potential to produce known secondary metabolites such as siderophore, antifungal antibiotics, HCN and protease which showed antagonistic activity against Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora  nicotianae var. parasitica, Pythium sp. and Fusarium sp. (Anand et al., 2010).
 
Keeping the above points in view, the present study was undertaken.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads
 
Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from the major soybean growing areas of Dharwad and Belagavi districts of Karnataka. Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads was carried out on King’s B medium using serial dilution and spread plate technique.
 
Characterization of FP isolates
 
The colonies showing greenish to yellowish pigmentation on King’s B medium were picked up and observed for fluorescence under UV light. The isolates were also studied for their colony morphology, cell shape and gram reaction as per the standard procedure given by Barthalomew and Mittewar (1950) and Anonymous (1957). The isolates were subjected to biochemical characterization by employing the standard procedures given by Cappuccino and Sherman (1992). Different biochemical tests performed were Denitrification, Starch hydrolysis, Arginine hydrolysis, Gelatin liquification and Oxidase test.
 
Functional characterization of FP isolates
 
The isolates were also tested for their ability to solubilise P, HCN production, Siderophore production and ability to produce plant growth promoting substances like IAA and GA.
 
In vitro screening of fluorescent pseudomonad isolates against Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., of soybean
 
The FP isolates were also studied for their antagonistic activity against Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., causing collar or root rot (soil borne) in soybean plant under  in vitro condition. The pure culture of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., were obtained from the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
       
The dual inoculation technique of Sakthivel and Gnanamanickam (1987) was followed to study the antagonistic activity of the fluorescent pseudomonads against soil borne plant pathogens.  
 
Evaluation of efficient isolates of fluorescent pseudomonads for their antagonistic activity against S. rolfsii of soybean under pot culture condition
 
Pot experiment was conducted with challenge inoculation of S. rolfsii along with appropriate control taking soybean as test crop.
       
This experiment comprised eight treatments and six replications with a view to record wilt incidence and also for destructive sampling at 30 and 60 days after sowing. The treatment details and the different FP isolates used for the experiments are outlined below.
 
Treatments
T1: BFP22 + S. rolfsii
T2: BFP38 + S.rolfsii
T3: DFP48 + S. rolfsii
T4: DFP47 + S. rolfsii
T5: DFP62 + S. rolfsii
T6: (Carboxin 37.5 % +Thiram 37.5%) + S. rolfsii 
T7: S. rolfsii alone
T8: Absolute control
         
 
The seeds of soybean variety, JS 335 were used. The medium black, sandy loam soil collected from experimental field was autoclaved to kill the initial microbial inoculum for making it pathogen free. The soil was mixed with well decomposed FYM @ 10 t/ha. It was also mixed with sand in 9:1 (soil: sand) proportion to improve porosity of soil. Earthen pots of 30 cm top diameter were filled with 10 kg soil. Before sowing, the soil in each pot was mixed with recommended dose of fertilizers.
 
Challenge inoculation of Sclerotium rolfsii
 
The fungus, S. rolfsii causing collar or root rot disease in soybean was multiplied as a mixed inoculum in maize powder and sand (1:4) mixture, which is commonly called as jaint culture. For pot application, top 200 gm of soil was inoculated with 5% of pathogen inoculum (jaint culture) one day before sowing.
 
Preparation and inoculation of selected fluorescent pseudomonads
 
The fluorescent pseudomonad isolates were multiplied in King’s B broth for 96 h at 30°C under shaking conditions (175 rpm). These broth cultures were diluted to maintain the population of 108-109 cfu/ml and applied @ 10 ml per pot just one day after sowing. Soybean seeds were treated with respective isolates at the rate of 10 gm per kg of seed, 10-15 min prior to sowing and for the chemical control treatment, the seeds were treated with Carboxin 37.5% + Thiram 37.5% at the rate of 4 g/kg of seeds.
Observations regarding, per cent seedling emergence, plant growth parameters and yield parameters were recorded.
 
Disease scoring
 
Observations on wilt incidence caused by S. rolfsii were recorded at 15, 30 and 60 DAS and per cent disease incidence was calculated by using the formula given by Mayee and Datar, 1986.

 
 
           
               
Statistical analysis

The statistical analyzes of the data were carried out by employing completely randomized design (CRD). The critical differences were calculated at P = 0.01 for the pot culture experiments wherever F tests were significant and interpretation of the results was carried out in accordance with Pansey and Sukhatme (1985).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads from rhizosphere soil was carried out by employing serial dilution and plating on King’s B selective media. It may be attributed to specific choice of media employed for isolation viz., Nutrient agar and King’s B. Several others hence supported to use King’s B medium for isolation of fluorescent Pseudomonad sp. (King et al., 1954). For the isolation of pseudomonads and fluorescent Pseudomonad sp., TSA and King’s B agar medium were also used (Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998). Total of eight FP isolates were obtained from the rhizosphere soil samples collected from the major soybean growing areas of Dharwad and Belagavi districts of Karnataka.
 
All eight isolates were used to study morphological traits. The colony morphology of isolates was found to be round to irregular shape and the irregular shaped colonies were found to be spreading type (Table 1). All the eight isolates exhibited fluorescence under UV light. However variations with respect to intensity of fluorescence and colony morphology were observed.  Fluorescence is an important trait for identification, characterization and grouping of fluorescent pseudomonads (Brown and Lowbury, 1968). Among the isolates majority of the isolates produced light green to green pigmented colonies, while some of the isolates appeared to have yellowish orange colonies. It is reported from earlier studies that some pigments such as carotenoids produced by pseudomonad species do not diffuse in to the medium and such colonies were found to have yellowish green colour which could resemble other fluorescing pigments (Indi, 2010).
 
The cell morphological studies and the gram reaction test revealed that all the 8 isolates were rod shaped and displayed a negative reaction for the gram staining.
 
The biochemical characterization indicated that out of eight isolates, four were positive for starch hydrolysis and two for arginine hydrolysis, six for oxidase test, five were positive for gelatin liquefaction and seven exhibited the denitrification ability (Table 2). These results are in conformity with Singh et al., (2013), who reported that out of seventeen isolates, seven isolates were identified to be Pseudomonas sp. on the basis of their cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics.
 
All the isolates were also examined for their functional properties like, P-solubilization, production of plant growth promoting substances, HCN production, siderophore production and their biocontrol potential. All the isolates were able to produce clear zone of P-solubilization (TCP) on Pikovskaya’s agar medium. These isolates displayed wide variations in the diameter of the zone of solubilization, which varied from 18.80-21.71mm (Table 3). The extent of zone of solubilization may or may not correlate with the amount of P solubilized (Rashid et al., 2004). Isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens species differ in the ability to produce phosphatase enzyme and production of organic acids and hence showed different solubilization efficiency (Priyanka et al., 2017).

All isolates were screened for their ability to produce IAA and GA. All the fluorescent pseudomonads in the present study produced significantly varying quantities of IAA (19.97 µg to 28.89 µg IAA/25 ml of broth). Among the isolates, DFP48 recorded highest IAA production of 28.89 µg/25ml. Isolates from the rhizosphere are more efficient auxin producers than isolates from the bulk soil (Sarwar and Kremer, 1992) and IAA production by PGPR can vary among different species and strains, and it is also influenced by culture condition, growth stage and substrate availability (Mirza et al., 2001). The amount of GA production by different FP isolates ranged from 12.19 to 18.52 µg/25 ml of broth. The isolate DFP54 was found to produce maximum amount of GA (18.52 µg per 25 ml broth).
       
Fluorescent pseudomonads offer an interesting biological system with their ability to promote plant growth directly through production of plant growth promoting substances (IAA and GA) and indirectly through control of plant pathogens and deleterious organisms or both (Bakthavatchalu et al., 2012). Seed bacterization with such organisms has emerged as a powerful technology to enhance plant growth and yield, besides providing protection against diseases.
       
The fluorescent pseudomonads have been the most widely studied group of PGPR with respect to biocontrol of soil borne plant pathogens. The increased interest in the fluorescent Pseudomonad sp. in worldwide as biocontrol agents gained momentum after the initial studies conducted at the University of California, Berkeley, during the late 1970s (Weller et al., 1988). 
       
In addition to all the beneficial traits as discussed earlier, the isolates were used to study their antagonistic potential against fungal pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii of soybean under in vitro condition using dual plate technique (Vincent, 1947).
       
All the isolates showed antagonistic activity against Sclerotium rolfsii. The per cent inhibition of 36.85 to 70.37 was recorded by the isolates. The maximum per cent inhibition of 70.37 was observed in the isolate BFP22. The isolates BFP38 and DFP48 were next highest with per cent inhibition of 60.93 and 58.89 respectively.
       
These observations were in line with the earlier reports on fluorescent pseudomonads against plant pathogenic fungi like Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Macrophomina, Pyricularia, Alternaria, Sclerotium, Colletotrichum, Pythium and Phytophthora (Ahmadzadeh et al., 2006; Kandoliya and Vakharia, 2013; Rakh, 2011; Vishwanath et al., 2012; Manivannan et al., 2012 and  Prasad et al., 2013).
       
Some rhizobacteria promote plant growth by production of siderophores. The role of sidrophore production in plant growth promotion is described by two mechanisms: one is direct supply of iron to plant; the other is indirect, in depriving fungal pathogens to iron. In the present study, all the isolates were found positive for siderophore production; however the zone of clearance on CAS agar ranged from 21.97-36.37 mm. The isolate DFP54 showed maximum zone of clearance of 36.37 mm on CAS agar media. The next highest zone of clearance (29.23 mm) was recorded by the isolate DFP48 followed by DFP62 (26.70 mm). Similarly, all the isolates were found to be strong (+++) HCN producers.
 
Biocontrol potential and plant growth promotional ability of selected fluorescent pseudomonads on soybean challenge inoculated with S. rolfsii under pot culture condition
 
Five FP isolates were selected for pot culture studies based on their ability to produce IAA, GA, HCN and siderophore production and dual plate assay against S. rolfsii causing collar or root rot disease in soybean. It was also focused to assess the ability of antagonistic isolates for biocontrol potential as well as plant growth promotion.
 
Per cent seedling emergence
 
All the treatments had a considerable influence on the seedling emergence (Table 4). Among the treatments, T5 (DFP62) recorded highest per cent seedling emergence (90.11) followed by the treatment T4 (DFP47) (89.87) which was on par with T2 (BFP38+ S. rolfsii) (38.27 cm). Lowest plant height of 18.42 cm was recorded in the treatment T7 (S. rolfsii) which was lesser than the treatment T8 (absolute control) (33.80 cm).
 
Number of branches
 
At 90 DAS, the treatment T3 (DFP48+ S. rolfsii) showed significantly higher number of braches per plant (11.82) over all other treatments.  The treatments T4 (DFP47+ S. rolfsii) (11.04), T5 (DFP62+ S. rolfsii) (10.92), T6 (carboxin 37.5%+Thiram 37.5%+ S. rolfsii) (10.89) and T2 (BFP38+ S. rolfsii) (10.73) were on par with each other. Lowest number of branches was observed in T7 (S. rolfsii) (9.96).
 
Nodule number
 
At 60 DAS, considerably increase in the number of nodules was observed. The maximum number of nodules of 15.67 was recorded by the treatment T3 (DFP48 +   S. rolfsii), which was on par with T5 (DFP62 + S. rolfsii) (14.00), T2 (BFP38 + S. rolfsii) (13.67) and T1 (BFP22 + S. rolfsii) (13.00). (S. rolfsii) (T7) recorded the lowest nodule number of 8.50.
       
At 90 DAS, significantly higher number of nodules were recorded in T5 (DFP62+ S. rolfsii) (17.67) which was on par with T3 (DFP48+ S. rolfsii) (17.33), T2 (BFP38+ S. rolfsii) (15.50), T4 (DFP47+ S. rolfsii) (15.33) and T1 (BFP22+ S. rolfsii) (15.17). The least number of nodules (9.67) were observed in T7 (S. rolfsii).
 
Total dry matter production
 
At harvesting stage, the treatment T3 (DFP48+ S. rolfsii) achieved significantly highest dry matter production (7.57 g/plant) over all other treatments, which was followed by the treatment T5 (DFP62 + S. rolfsii) (5.75 g/ plant) and T4 (DFP47+ S. rolfsii) (5.58 g/plant). All the treatments with FP inoculation performed very well with respect to total dry matter production compare to the pathogen (S. rolfsii) alone inoculated treatment (T7) (3.02 g/plant) and absolute control (T8) (4.49 g/plant).
 
Effect of efficient fluorescent pseudomonad isolate on yield parameters of soybean challenge inoculated with S. rolfsii       
 
Number of pods per plant
 
Data pertaining to the number of pods per plant is presented in Table 7. Significantly highest number of pods per plant were recorded in treatment T3 (DFP48 + S. rolfsii) (19.30) over all other treatments, which was followed by the treatment T2 (BFP48+ S. rolfsii), (16.17) which is on par with T4 (DFP47+ S. rolfsii) (15.80). Lowest pods (8.97) were observed in T7 treatment compared to T6 (carboxin 37.5%+Thiram 37.5%+ S. rolfsii) 10.90/plant.
       
At harvest, all the treatments differed significantly with respect to number of pods. Significantly highest numbers of pods were observed in T3, which was followed by T2 and T4.
 
Number of seeds/plant
 
The results pertaining to pod weight / plant is presented in Table 7. The treatment T3 (DFP48+ S. rolfsii) recorded higher number of seeds/plant (55.77) and was significantly superior over all other treatments. It was followed by the treatment T5 (DFP62 + S. rolfsii) which recorded 46.17 number of seeds/plant which was on par with T2 (BFP38+ S. rolfsii) (45.87). Pathogen inoculated treatment (T7) recorded lowest number of seeds/plant (28.30). Whereas T8 (absolute control) recorded 33.47 number of seeds/plant.
 
Seed weight (g/plant)
 
The treatments had a significant influence on the weight of seeds/plant (Table 7). The treatment T3 (DFP48+ S. rolfsii) recorded significantly highest seed weight of 9.23 g/plant over all other treatments, which was followed by the treatment T2 (BFP38+ S. rolfsii) with seed weight of 7.87 g/plant. T8 (absolute control) recorded the seed weight of 6.00 g/plant which is slightly higher than the pathogen inoculated treatment (T7) (5.00 g).
       
The higher plant height, nodule number, dry matter production, number of pods, number of seeds, seed weight compared to control clearly showed the beneficial role of these rhizobacteria, which might be attributed to IAA, production, P-solubilization and many other PGPR activity in favour of plant growth response.
       
Saravanakumar et al., (2007a) also showed that inoculation with fluorescent Pseudomonas induced a significant increase in root and shoot length over the uninoculated control. Pseudomonas fluorescens has been shown to increase seed germination, root and shoot length and seedling vigour in several instances (Ramamoorthy et al., 2002; Khalid et al., 2003; Egamberdieva, 2008). Pseudomonas spp. was reported to produce amino acids, salicylic acid and IAA (Sivamani and Gnanamanickam, 1988; Osullivan and Ogara, 1992) which might have improved the plant growth and seedling vigour.

CONCLUSION

Biological control of plant diseases opened an era of new technology to manage crop diseases and received the attention of researchers throughout the world, which will enhance the sustainability of agricultural production systems and to reduce the use of chemical pesticides. A few of the available biocontrol agents mostly belonging to Pseudomonas sp. show broad-spectrum antifungal activity by virtue of volatile and diffusible antibiotics. In this view, the present study aimed at screening efficient fluorescent pseudomonads against Sclerotium rolfsii of soybean. Eight isolates obtained from Rhizosphere sample are positive for IAA, GA production, HCN, siderophore production. These isolates were also antagonists to Sclerotium rolfsii. Pot culture studies revealed that the treatment T3 (DFP48 + S. rolfsii) recorded highest plant height, nodule number, total dry matter production, no. of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant and seed weight. T3 (DFP48 + S. rolfsii) also showed very less per cent disease incidence compared to all other treatments. These isolates can be further explored for their efficacy as effective PGPR. Application of these multifunctional microbes for diseases management and their practical application require further investigation under field conditions.

REFERENCES


  1. Ahmadzadeh, M., Afsharmanesh, H., Javan, M. Sharifi, A. (2006). Identification of some molecular traits in fluorescent pseudomonads with antifungal activity. Iranian J. Biotechnol., 4(4) : 245-253. 

  2. Alam, G. (2000). A study of bio-pesticides and bio-fertilizers in Haryana, India gatekeeper no. SA93. Int. Inst. Environ. Devp. London, p.32. 

  3. Anand, M., Naik, M. K., Ramegowda, G., Devika Rani, G. S. (2010). Biocontrol and plant growth promotion activity of indigenous Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates. J. Mycopathol. Res., 48(1) : 45-50. 

  4. Anonymous, (1957). Manual of Microbiological Methods, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc., New York, p. 127. 

  5. Ashrafuzzaman, M., Hossen, F. A., Ismail, M. R., Hoque, M. A., Islam, M. Z., Shahidullah, S. M., Meon, S. (2009). Efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the enhancement of rice growth. African J. Biotechnol., 8 : 1247-1252. 

  6. Bakthavatchalu, S., Shivakumar, S., Sullia, S. B. (2012). Identification of multi-trait PGPR isolates and evaluation of their potential as biocontrol agents. Acta Biologica Indica, 1(1): 61-67. 

  7. Barthalomew, J. W. and Mittewar, T. (1950). A simplied bacterial stain. Stain Tech., 25: 153. 

  8. Bharathi, R., Vivekanandhan, R., Harish S., Ramanathan, A., Samiyap, R. (2004). Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Prot., 23: 835-843. 

  9. Brown, V. I. and Lowbury, E. J. L. (1968). Use of an improved cetrimide agar medium and other culture methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Path., 18: 752- 756.

  10. Cappuccino, J. G. and Sherman, N. (1992). Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual,The Benjamin/Cummins Publishing Company Inc., California, pp. 8-26. 

  11. Clarke, P H. (1982). The metabolic versatility of pseudomonads. Canadian J. Microbiol., 48(2): 105-130. 

  12. Egamberdieva, D. (2008). Alleviation of salinity stress in radishes with phytohormone producing rhizobacteria. J. Biotechnol., 136: 262.

  13. Haas, D. and Defago, G. (2005). Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 3: 307-319. 

  14. Indi, D. V. (2010). Studies on plant growth promoting fluorescent pseudomonads of Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka state, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India). 

  15. Kandoliya, U.K. and Vakharia, D.N. (2013). Antagonistic effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Ciceri causing wilt in chickpea. Legume Research-An International Journal. 36:569-575. 

  16. Khalid, A., Arshad, M., Zahir, Z. A. (2003). Growth and yield response of wheat to inoculation with auxin producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Pakistan J. Bot., 35 (4): 483-498.

  17. King, E. O., Ward, M. K., Raney, D. E. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 44: 301-7. 

  18. Lugtenberg, B. J., Dekkers, L., Bloemberg, G. V. (2001). Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 3: 461-490. 

  19. Lim, H. S., Kim, Y. S. and Kim, S. D. (1991). Pseudomonas stutzeri YPL-1 genetic transformation and antifungal mechanisms against Fusarium solani and agent of plant root rot. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57 : 510-516.

  20. Manivannan, M., Ganesh, P, Suresh, R., Tharmaraj, K., Shiney, B. (2012). Isolation, screening, characterization and antagonism assay of PGPR isolates from rhizosphere of rice plants in Cuddalore distric. Intl. J. Pharma. Biol. Arch., 3(1): 179-185. 

  21. Martinez, V. O, Jorquera, M. A., Crowley, D. E., Gajardo, G. and Mora, M. L. (2010). Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J. Soil Sci. Pl. Nutr., 10: 293-319. 

  22. Mayee, C. D. and Datar, V. V. (1986). Phytopathometry, Technical Bulletin-1 (Special Bulletin-3). Marathwada Agric. Uni., Parbhani, p. 95. 

  23. Mirza, M. S., Ahmad, W., Latif, F., Haurat, J., Bally, R., Normand, P., Malik, K. A. (2001). Isolation, partial characterization and the effect of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on micro propagated sugarcane in vitro. Pl. Soil. , 237 : 47-54. 

  24. Nihorembere, V., Ongena, M., Smargiass, M. (2011). Beneficial effect of the rhizosphere microbial community for plant growth and health. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 15 (2): 327-337. 

  25. Osullivan, D. J. and Ogara, F. (1992). Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiol., Rev., 56(4) : 662-676. 

  26. Pansey, V. S. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1985). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Work. ICAR, New Delhi, pp. 152-155. 

  27. Prasad, J. S., Jha, M., Kumar, R. N., Gupta, A. K. (2013). Isolation, screening and antagonism assay of Pseudomonas spp. for plant growth promoting activity and its compatibility with pesticide molecules. Bioinfolet, 10(4): 1487-1491.

  28. Priyanka., Geeta. Goudar., P. Jones Nirmal Nath., P. V. Patil. (2017). Isolation, characterization and antagonistic activity of Fluorescent Pseudomonads. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(12): 3883-3898.

  29. Raaijmakers, J. M. and Weller, D. M. (1998). Natural plant protection by 2, 4- diacetylphloroglucinol producing Pseudomonas sp. in take-all disease soils. Mole. Pl. Microbe Int., 11: 144-152.

  30. Rakh, R. R. (2011). Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii, causing stem rot of groundnut by Pseudomonas spp. Recent Res. Sci. Technol., 3(3): 26-34. 

  31. Ramamoorthy, V., Raghuchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. (2002). Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Pl. Soil, 239: 55-68. 

  32. Rashid, M., Khalil, S., Ayub, N., Alam, S., Latif, F. (2004). Organic acids production and phosphate solubilization by phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) under in vitro conditions. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci., 7: 187-196. 

  33. Sarvanakumar, D., Vijaykumar, C., Kumar, N. and Samiyappan, R. (2007). ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediate slime resistance in groundnut plants. J. Appl. Microbiol., 102: 1283-1292. 

  34. Saravanakumar, D., Harish, S., Loganathan, M., Vivekananthan, R., Rajendran, L., Raguchander, T. and Samiyappan, R. (2007a). Rhizobacterial bioformulation for the effective management of Macrophomina root rot in mungbean. Arch. Phytopathol. Pl. Prot., 40(5): 323-337. 

  35. Sarwar, M. and Kremer, R. J. (1992). Determination of bacterially derived auxins using a microplate method. Let. Appl. Microbiol., 20: 282-285.

  36. Sakthivel, N. and Gnanamanickam, S. S. (1987). Evaluation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for suppression of sheath rot disease and enhancement of grain yields in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 47 : 2056-2059. 

  37. Scarpellini, M., Franzetti, L. and Galli, A. (2004). Development of PCR assay to identify Pseudomonas fluorescens and its biotype. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 236 : 257-260. 

  38. Sinclair, J. B. (1978). The seed borne nature of some soybean pathogens, the effect of Phomopsis Spp. and Bacillus subtilis on germination and their occurrence in soybean produced in Illionois. Seed Sci. Technol., 6: 957-964. 

  39. Sinclair, J. B. (1988). Anthracnose of soybean In : Soybean diseases of North Central region (Eds.) Wyllie, T. D and Suth, D. H. American phytopathological society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, p. 104. 

  40. Singh, Y., Ramteke, P. W. and Shukla, P. K. (2013). Isolation and characterization of heavy metal resistant Pseudomonas spp. and their plant growth promoting activities. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 4(1): 269-272. 

  41. Sivamani, E. and Gnanamanickam, S. S. (1988). Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense in banana by inoculation with Pseudomonas fluroscense. Pl. Soil, 107(2): 3-9. 

  42. Vishwanath, P., Shankar, S., Suvarna, V. C., Jayasheela. (2012). Biological control of collar rot of sunflower using rhizobacteria. Intl. J. Pl. Protect. 5(2): 391-393. 

  43. Vincent, J. M. (1947). Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitor. Nature, 159: 800. 

  44. Weller, D. M., Howke, W. J., Cook, R. J. (1988). Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Phytopathol., 38 : 1094. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)