The success of breeding programs is principally dependent on the availability of genetic variation in the breeding materials. The indigenous farmers’ varieties of urdbean are sources of important gene (s) for genetic diversity. Genetic diversity of farmers’ varieties and gene pools can increase the productivity of farming systems in a range of growing conditions and more diverse farming systems are also generally more resilient in the face of stress. It is an essential requirement for increasing crop productivity through breeding. Therefore, evaluation of local array of urdbean is an appropriate approach to seeking genes which are rare or absent in cultigens. The overall effect of plant breeding on genetic diversity has been a long standing concern in the evolutionary biology of crop improvements (
Simmonds, 1962). Evaluating and understanding the extent of genetic diversity existing in the farmers’ varieties is important and leads to effective utilization of the farmers’ varieties. Hence, local farmers’ varieties collected from the different parts of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands of urdbean were analysed using morphological markers to understand the genetic diversity. The present study were in agreement with the previous studies revealed that urdbean genetic variability was sufficient in as urdbean farmers’ varieties to be exploited in breeding programs
(Tickoo et al., 1988 and
Tomooka et al., 2002).
Characterization of genotypes seeds of with regard to stable simple inherited characters is pre-requisite for varietal identification
(Tripathi et al., 2011). A set of 56 accessions of urdbean representing farm saved seeds of farmers’ varieties were studied for 21 DUS parameters and stable morphological traits (Table 1 and 2). The farmers’ varieties showed enough range of variation for all nine quantitative traits. The analysis of variance (Table 3) showed significant differences among the farmers’ varieties for all the traits at 0.01 % level. In general, the farmers’ varieties with desirable characters were present in each trait group. However there were still some preferable characters such as high seed yield per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of pods per plant and seed weight which existed in rather low frequency in the set of farmers’ varieties. Seed size and seed yield per plant is one of the most limiting factors for productivity. The farmers’ varieties ANFVU-15-31 followed by ANFVU-15-38, ANFVU-16-08 and ANFVU-15-23 were shown large seeded (100 seed weight ranges 5.33 - 6.34 g) exhibited significantly different from other farmers’ varieties for seed yield per plant. In contrast, ANFVU-14-01 followed by ANFVU-15-22, ANFVU-16-10 and ANFVU-16-01 identified to have small seeded (100-seed weight ranges 2.75 - 2.96 g). Among the 56 farmers’ varieties accessions ANFVU-14-01 and ANFVU-15-34 had shown extra earliness with erect plant growth habit. However, the promising accessions ANFVU-14-07, ANFVU-14-11, ANFVU-15-21, ANFVU-15-23, ANFVU-15-31, ANFVU-15-38 and ANFVU-16-08 had shown erect plant growth habit with early and medium pod lengths. The farmers’ varieties ANFVU-15-31 followed by ANFVU-15-23, ANFVU-14-11, ANFVU-15-21, ANFVU-15-38 and ANFVU-16-08, while ANFVU-14-07 were significantly different from other farmers’ varieties for seed yield per plant. Twenty three accessions bears black seed coat colour while, 14 each exhibit green seed coat colour and mottled, 02 accessions bears greenish brown seed colour and 3 brown colour.
The hierarchical (UPGMA) cluster analysis conducted using standardized data classified the 56 farmers’ varieties were grouped into 9 groups. A dendogram based on average linkage distance for 56 urdbean farmers’ varieties was also calculated (Fig 1). Cluster I exhibits the largest, consisting of 26 accessions, while cluster VIII have only one accession (ANFVU-15-31) and had highest seed yield per plant showing earliness, erect plant growth habit and medium pod length. Mean values for each cluster were summarized (Table 4). Among them, cluster I consists of 26 farmers’ varieties is the most interesting, as its only 2 accessions (ANFVU-15-38 and ANFVU-16-50) had high seed yield per plant. However, cluster IX had only two farmers’ varieties in its group (ANFVU-14-11 and ANFVU-15-23) that had high seed yield per plant with erect plant growth habit, medium pod length and earliness. Although Cluster I having 26 and cluster II having 5 distinct farmers’ varieties showed early flowering, erect plant growth habit and they also had high 100 seed weight. The outlier, ANFVU-15-31 was distinct from the other farmers’ varieties only for seed yield per plant, 100-seed weight, erect plant growth habit and number of pods per plant with black seed colour and dull seed lusture.
In the present study results revealed that the farmers’ varieties were grouped together on the basis of morphological performance rather than origin or source. Cluster analysis based on agriculturally important traits revealed that advance breeding lines and recommended cultivars were mostly characterized in Cluster I, which may be because of high selection pressure for high yield potential. This finding revealed that only a portion of genetic diversity has been exploited and it is suggested that selection of proper farmers’ varieties is playing a vital role for broaden genetic base of cultivated urdbean involving diverse parents for a successful breeding program. Parents with more genetic base can create higher genetic variation which can increase of genetic gain in selection. So depend on breeding objectives the result of cluster analysis can be applied for crossing program for urdbean improvement. In order to ensure the efficient and effective use of farmers’ varieties, its characterization is imperative and cluster analysis provides a good evaluation of farmers’ varieties by identifying those that should be further evaluated at the genetic level for future breeding programme. The findings were supported with the findings of
Gantait et al., (2009), Singh et al., (2014), Tripathi et al., (2011) and
Tripathi et al., (2016). Morphological characterizations as an important step in description of classification of crop farmers’ varieties because a breeding program mainly depends upon the magnitude of genetic variability.
Tarika et al., (2009) and
Abna et al., (2012) also evaluated and reported a wide range of diversity for most of the quantitative traits among mungbean diverse collection. These findings reflect that the tendency of each accession to emphasize agronomic traits as opposed to reproductive growth.
Gafoor et al., (2001) evaluated different urdbean collections for quantitative traits and observed a wide range of diversity for most of the traits, along with some accessions of unique characters which could help to identify farmers’ varieties with suitable traits which can be used in direct selection and hybridization program for breeding to broaden genetic base.
Abna et al., (2012) assess the genetic diversity among 20 farmers’ varieties of mungbean under Malaysian tropical environment for 8 quantitative characters and reported that morphological traits, which had more effects on diversity and three components explained 79% of the total variation among farmers’ varieties can be used for direct selection or for the hybridization programme for high yielding varieties.