Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 43 issue 1 (february 2020) : 38-42

ISSR based diversity analysis in beachpea [Vigna marina (Burm.) Merr.] accessions of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India 

Awnindra K Singh, A. Velmurugan, Debjyoti Sen Gupta, N.P. Singh, S. Dam Roy, Utpal Biswas, R. Rahul Kumar
1ICAR- Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair-744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India.

  • Submitted14-09-2017|

  • Accepted25-02-2019|

  • First Online 04-10-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3943

Cite article:- Singh K Awnindra, Velmurugan A., Gupta Sen Debjyoti, Singh N.P., Roy Dam S., Biswas Utpal, Kumar Rahul R. (2019). ISSR based diversity analysis in beachpea [Vigna marina (Burm.) Merr.] accessions of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Legume Research. 43(1): 38-42. doi: 10.18805/LR-3943.

ABSTRACT

Beachpea [Vigna marina (Berm.) Merr.] is a less-known food legume species, usually found near to sandy sea beaches. In the present study, a total of 17 ISSR primers were used to study the genetic diversity of 16 accessions of beachpea. The number of amplicons of genomic DNA ranged from 4 (UBC 818) to 110 (HB 13) among accessions and varied in size from 125 bp to 3000 bp. Amplification of genomic DNA of 16 accessions produced 861 amplicons, of which 588 were polymorphic (68.29%) with an average of 35 polymorphic fragments per primer. Average PIC ranged from 0.01 (UBC 809) to 0.499 (UBC 811). UPGMA analysis grouped the accessions into two main clusters, I and II comprising of 12 and 4 accessions, respectively. The Jaccard similarity coefficient between different beachpea accessions ranged from 0.38 to 1.00. The higher degree of genetic variation in the accessions revealed by ISSR analysis could be useful in characterization and conservation point of view of wild Vigna species.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajibade, S.R., Weeden, N.F. and Chite, S.M. (2000). Inter-simple sequence repeats analysis of genetic relationships in the genus Vigna. J. Euphytica, 111 (1):47-55. 
  2. Botstein, B., White, R.L., Skolnick, M., Davis, R.W. (1980) Molecular markers in plant genome analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32: 314–331.
  3. Chankaew, S., Isemura, T. and Naito, K., Tanaka, E.O., Tomooka, N., Somta, P., Kaga, A., Vaughan, D.A., Srinives, P. (2014). QTL mapping for salt tolerance and domestication-related traits in Vigna marina Subsp. oblonga, a halophytic species. Theor Appl Genet., 127: 691-702.
  4. Elanchezian, R., Rajalakshmi, S. and Jayakumar, V. (2009). Salt tolerance capacity of rhizobimum species associated with Vigna marina. Indian J. Agric. Sci.,79 (12): 980-985.
  5. Hady, A.A. A. Elham, Haiba, A.A.A., Hamid, N.R.A. El, Ansary, A.E.R.M.F.Al and Mohamed, A.Y. (2010). Assessment of genetic variations in some Vigna species by RAPD and ISSR analysis. New York Science J., 3 (11):120-128. 
  6. Kaga, A., Vaughan, D.A. and Tomooka, N. (2005). Molecular markers in Vigna improvement: understanding and using gene pools. In: Lorz, H., Wanzel, G. (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Molecular markers systems, Berlin, Springer, 55:171-187. 
  7. Lewis, G., Schire, B., Mackinder, B. and Lock, M. (2005). Legumes of the world. Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens.
  8. Murray, M.G. and Thomson, W.F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 8: 4321-4325.
  9. Padulosi, S. and Ng, N.Q. (1993). A useful and unexploited herb, Vigna marina (Leguminosae-Papilionideae) and the taxonomic revision of its genetic diversity. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, 62:119-126. 
  10. Pardhe, Deepak D.and Satpute, Rajendra A. (2011). A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in genus Vigna savi genotypes using ISSR. Int. J. Pharm Tech Res. 3 (1): 464-470.
  11. Rohlf, F.J. (2000). NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.1. Exeter Software, New York, Pp.83.
  12. Samarjeewa, P.K., Nanayakkara, H.L.V., Ekanyake, E.M.D.S.N. and Sumanasinghe, V.A. (2002). RAPD analysis of genetic relationship of wild and cultivated Vigna species. Annals of Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture, 4: 2015-226.
  13. Sanjeewani, B.L. Ganesha, Jayasuriya, K.M.G. Gehan and Kirthisinghe, J.P. (2012). Effect of salinity on seed germination of Vigna marina a wild relative of crop Vigna species using hydrotime modeling. In: Proceedings of the International Forestry and Environment Symposium 2012 of the Department of the Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka. Session-I, Biodiversity, Conservation and Management, Pp. 32.
  14. Singh, Awnindra K., Gautam, R. K., Singh, P. K., Kumar, K., Kumar, N., Swain, S. and Roy, S. Dam (2014). Estimation of genetic variability and association analysis in the indigenous landraces of Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) of Andaman Islands. VEGETOS, 27 (1): 113-122. 
  15. Singh, Awnindra K., Gautam, R.K., Singh, V., Singh, P.K., Pandey, A., Ahmed, Z.A. and Roy, S. D. (2015). Genetic relationship of underutilized legume beachpea (Vigna marina) with cultivated mungbean and urdbean landraces of the Bay Islands based on ISSR markers. In: XII Agricultural Science Congress, 3-6 February, NDRI, Karnal, Pp.65.
  16. Sonnate, G. Spinosa, A., Marangi, A. and Pignone, D. (1997). Isozyme and RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity within and between Vigna luteola and Vigna marina. Annals of Botany, 80: 741-746. 
  17. Yoon, M.S., Lee, J., Kim, C.Y. and Baek, H.J. (2007). Genetic relationship among cultivated and wild Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi and Ohashi and relatives from Korea based on AFLP markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evaluation, 54: 875-883. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)