Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 42 issue 6 (december 2019) : 768-772

Genetic diversity and variability for protein and micro nutrients in advance breeding lines and chickpea varieties grown in Andhra Pradesh

V. Jayalakshmi, A. Trivikrama Reddy, K.V. Nagamadhuri
1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Nandyal-518 501, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Submitted24-08-2017|

  • Accepted20-02-2018|

  • First Online 20-06-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3933

Cite article:- Jayalakshmi V., Reddy Trivikrama A., Nagamadhuri K.V. (2018). Genetic diversity and variability for protein and micro nutrients in advance breeding lines and chickpea varieties grown in Andhra Pradesh. Legume Research. 42(6): 768-772. doi: 10.18805/LR-3933.
An investigation was taken up to study the nutritional value, extent of genetic variability and genetic diversity in advance breeding lines and chickpea varieties grown in Andhra Pradesh, India. Protein and micronutrient content (iron, zinc, copper and manganese) varied significantly among 54 genotypes. Protein content ranged from 9.5% to 24.9% while micro nutrients varied from 2.6 mg/100 g to 14.6 mg/100 g for iron, 3.5 mg/100 g to 7.7 mg/100 g for zinc, 0.5 mg/100 g to 3.2 mg/100 g for copper and 1.6 mg/100 g to 3.4 mg/100 g for manganese. Moderate to high genotypic variability for protein and micro nutrient content with high heritability and genetic advance indicated the scope for enhancement of traits through selection. Genetic diversity studies revealed five different clusters and that high protein lines are grouped in cluster I and lines with higher concentration of micro nutrients are grouped in clusters IV and V. Systematic hybridization between promising lines for protein and micronutrients chosen from these clusters is suggested to study their combining ability and subsequent use in breeding programmes intended to breed for superior chickpea cultivars.
  1. Diapari, M., Sindhu, A., Kirstin, B., Amit, D., Warkentin, T.D. and Tar’an, B. (2014). Genetic diversity and association mapping of iron and zinc concentrations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genome 57(8): 459-468
  2. dpd.dacnet.nic.in/ (2017). Contents provided, maintained and updated by Director, Directorate of Pulses Developmemt (DPD), Bhopal Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare Ministry, Government of India.
  3. FAO Stat. (2016). FAO statistical year book. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://    www.faostat.fao.org.
  4. Gaikwad, A.R., Desai, N.C., Langhi, A.M. and Jadhav, S.D. (2011). Studies on genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Ecology, Enviro. and Conserv. Paper 17 (3): 585-588.
  5. Iqbal, A., Khalil, I.A. and Ateeq, N. (2006). Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chem., 97: 331 – 335.
  6. Jadhav, A.A., Rayate, S.J., Mhase, L.B., Thudi, M., Chitikineni, A., Harser, P.N., Jadhav, A.S., Varsheney, R.K., Kulwai, P.L. (2015). Marker-trait association study for protein content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Genet., 94: 279-286. 
  7. Jones, D.B., (1941). Factors for converting percentages of nitrogen in foods and feeds into percentages of protein. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cirular No. 83.
  8. Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L. and Chibbar, R.N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) - A review. Br. J. Nutri., 108: S11-S26. 
  9. Kayan, N., Gulmezoglu, N. and Kaya, M.D. (2015). The optimum foliar zinc source and level for improving Zn content in seed of chickpea. Legume Res., 38 (6) 2015 : 826-831
  10. Kjeldahl, J. (1883). New method for the determination of nitrogen in organic substances, Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie., 22 : 366-383.
  11. Kozgar, M.I., Samiullah, K. and Rafiq, W.M. (2012). Variability and correlations studies for total iron and manganese contents of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) high yielding mutants. American J. Food Tech., 7: 437-444.
  12. Mahalanobis, PC (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences in India 2: 49-55.
  13. Mayer, J.G., Pfeiffer, W.H. and Beyer, P. (2008). Biofortified crops to alleviate micronutrient malnutrition. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11: 166-170.
  14. Munirathnam, P., Jayalakshmi, V., Ashok Kumar, K. and Padmalatha, Y. (2015). Suitability of chickpea ‘NBeG 47’ for mechanical harvesting under rainfed condition. J. Food Legumes, 28: 162-164.
  15. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods In Biometrical Research. John Wiley and sons Inc. New York, pp. 236-272.
  16. Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.D. (1977). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi p:252.
  17. Tandon, H.L.S. (1993). Methods of Analysis of Soils, Plants, Waters and Fertilizers. Fertilizers development and consultation organization, New Delhi, India. 144. 
  18. Torutaeva, E., Asanaliev. A., Prieto-Linde, M.L., Zborowska, A., Ortiz, R., Bryngelsson, T, and Gustavsson LG (2014). Evaluation of microsatellite-based genetic diversity, protein and mineral content in chickpea accessions grown in Kyrgyzstan. Hereditas 151: 81–90.
  19. Upadhyaya, H D., Bajaj, D., Shouvik Das, Vinod Kumar, C. L. L. Gowda, Shivali Sharma., Tyagi, A.K. and Parida S K. (2016). Genetic dissection of seed-iron and zinc concentrations in chickpea. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 6:24050 | DOI: 10.1038/srep24050
  20. Wood, J.A. and Grusak, M.A. (2007). Nutritional value of chickpea. In Chickpea Breeding and management (eds) Yadav SS, Redden RJ, Chen W, Sharma B. CAB International Pp. 101-142.

Editorial Board

View all (0)