Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 5 (october 2018) : 745-749

Performance of Kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) under different sowing dates in sub-mountainous area of Punjab

Amit Kaul, Charanjeet Kaur, Guriqbal Singh
1Regional Research Station, Punjab Agricultural University, Gurdaspur-143 521, Punjab, India.

  • Submitted25-02-2017|

  • Accepted11-08-2017|

  • First Online 29-12-2017|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3857

Cite article:- Kaul Amit, Kaur Charanjeet, Singh Guriqbal (2017). Performance of Kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) under different sowing dates in sub-mountainous area of Punjab. Legume Research. 41(5): 745-749. doi: 10.18805/LR-3857.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at Regional Research Station (Punjab Agricultural University) Gurdaspur and Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Pathankot during the spring season of 2016, to determine the performance of kidney bean genotypes at different sowing dates under sub-mountainous conditions of Punjab. The two kidney bean genotypes i.e. red and speckled were evaluated for yield potential at two locations by adopting different sowing dates viz., 20th January, 1st February, 10th February and 20th February, 2016. The treatments were laid out in split plot design with four replications by keeping sowing dates in main plots and genotypes in sub plots. Among different dates of sowing, crop sown on 10th February showed superiority than other dates through higher emergence count per meter row length, plant height, branches per plant, pods per plant, seeds per pod, length of pod, biological yield and seed yield. The seed yield in February 10 sown crop was 66.4, 33.3 and 21.7 per cent higher than February 20, January 10 and February 1 sown crop, respectively at Gurdaspur. Similarly, at Pathankot, the percent increase in seed yield in February 10 sown crop was 36.0 and 7.2 per cent as compared to February 20 and February 1 sown crop, respectively. The kidney bean genotype speckled produced significantly higher yield attributes (seeds per pod, length of pod and 100 seed weight) and seed yield at both Gurdaspur and Pathankot (935.1 and 823.1 kg per ha, respectively) as compared to red genotype. Therefore, it can be concluded that to attain higher productivity of kidney beans, the speckled genotype could be used for cultivation by adopting February 10 as the optimum time of sowing in the sub-mountainous area of Punjab.

REFERENCES

  1. Amanullah J. I, Hayat T. F, Khan A. I and Khan N. (2002) Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of mash bean varieties. Asian J. Pl. Sci. 1:622-624.
  2. Chatterjee B. N. and Bhattacharya K. K. (1986) Principles and Practices of Grain LegumeProduction. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., NewDelhi. pp. 492.
  3. Cheema H. S. and Singh B. 1991. Software Statistical Package CPCS-1. Department of Statistics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
  4. Dapaah H. K, Mckenzie B. A and Hill G. D (2000) Influence of sowing date and irrigation on the growth and yield of pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in a subhumid temperate environment. J. Agri. Sci. 134:33-43.
  5. El-Noemani A. A, El-Zeiny H. A., El-Gindy A. M., El-Sahhar E. A. and El-Shawadfy M. A (2010) Performance of some bean (Phaseolus VulgarisL.) varieties under different irrigation systems and regimes, Australian J. Basic and Appl. Sci. 4(12): 6185-6196 
  6. Kay D. E. (1979) Food Legumes. Digest No. 3 pp. 127. 
  7. Lemma D. (2003) Snap Bean Production and Research Status (Phasiolus vulgaris) in Ethiopia. Melkasa Agricultural Research Center. Nazret, Ethiopia.
  8. Mayhew S. and Penny A. (1988) Tropical and Sub-Tropical Foods. MacMillan Education LTD. London, England.
  9. Moniruzzaman M, Rahman S. M. L., Kibria M. G., Rahman M. A., Kaisar M. O. (2007). Performances of vegetable french bean as influenced by varieties and sowing dates in rabi season. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2(5): 69-73.
  10. Pandey R. K., Sexaena M. C. and Singh V. B. (1978) Growth analysis of blackgram genotypes. Indian J. Agril. Sci., 48: 466-473.
  11. Rajput R. P., Deshmukh M. R. and Paradkar V. K. (1987) Accumulated heat units and phenologyrelationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) asinfluenced by planting dates under late sownconditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 159: 345-48.
  12. Saini J. P. and Negi S. C., (1998) Effect of cultivar and date of sowing on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under dry temperate condition. Indian J Agron, 43: 110-113.
  13. Seyum E. G. (2014) Influence of plant spacing and date of sowing on yield and yield components of two snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties in Jimma,Southwestern Ethiopia. Merit Res. J. Agric Science and Soil Sci. 2(7):086-095
  14. Singer S. M, Helmy Y. I, Sawan O. M and El-Abd S. O. (1996) Effects of plastic tunnels and sowing dates on growth and productivity of bean varieties grown in calcareous soil conditions. Egypt J. Horticulture, 23(2)
  15. Vange T. and Obi I. U (2006) Effect of planting date on some agronomic traits and grain yield of upland rice varieties at Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. J. Sustain. Dev. Agric. Env. 2(1):1-9
  16. Vieira H. J, Bergamaschi H., Amgelocci L. R. and Libardi L. (1990) Performance of tow bean cultivars under two soil water availability regimes. II. Stomata1 resistance to vapour diffusion, transpiration flux density and water potential in the plant. Pesquisa Opecubria Brasileira, 24(9): 1045-1053.
  17. Yoldas F. and Esiyok D. (2007) Effects of sowing dates and cultural treatments on growth, quality and yield of processing beans. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 10:2470-2474
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)