Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 42 issue 3 (june 2019) : 385-391

Tank-mix insecticide and herbicide application effects on weeds, insect-pest menace and soybean productivity in Semi-Arid Northern Plains of India

Anchal Dass, Debjani Dey, S.K. Lal, G.A. Rajanna
1ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi 110 012, India

  • Submitted18-02-2017|

  • Accepted02-09-2017|

  • First Online 20-01-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3855

Cite article:- Dass Anchal, Dey Debjani, Lal S.K., Rajanna G.A. (2018). Tank-mix insecticide and herbicide application effects on weeds, insect-pest menace and soybean productivity in Semi-Arid Northern Plains of India. Legume Research. 42(3): 385-391. doi: 10.18805/LR-3855.

ABSTRACT

The effects of herbicides, alone application or in combination with insecticides, on performance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] were examined at ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014. Alone application of imazethapyr 10 SL @ 1.0 l/ha or in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 300 ml/ha and rynaxypyr 20 SC @ 100 ml/ha lowered monocot and dicot weed count, reduced weed dry matter and increased weed control efficiency in comparison with other herbicide and insecticide applications, individual or in combinations. These results suggested that the imazethapyr can effectively control different categories of weeds, especially of monocots in soybean field. However, seed yield, net returns and B: C ratios were higher in the quizalofop ethyl 5 EC (1.0 l/ha) applied plots followed by combined application of rynaxypyr 20 SC (100 ml/ha) + quizalofop ethyl 5 EC (1.0 l/ha)).

REFERENCES

  1. Argaw A. (2012). Evaluation of co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas spp. effect on soybean (Glycine max L. (Merr.)) in associated area. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 14: 213-224.
  2. Bera S., Pal D. and Ghosh R.K. (2012). Bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity of new molecule herbicides for weed management in soybean. J. Crop Weed 8(2):113-116.
  3. Buckelew L.D., Pedigo L.P., Mero H.M., Owen M.D.K and Tylka G.L. (2000). Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 93(5): 1437-1443.
  4. Cordova D., Benner E.A., Sacher M.D., Rauh J.J., Sopa J.S., Lahm G.P., Selby T.P., Stevenson T.M., et al. (2006). Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.84: 196-214.
  5. Dass A., Raj R., Vyas A.K. and Kumar S. (2016). Improved cultivation practices for soybean. Indian Fmg. 66 (2):10–13.
  6. FAO (2016). Food and Agricultural Organization, Annual Report, 2016. http://www.fao.org/news/archive/news-by-date/2016/en/
  7. Gaikwad R.P. and Pawar V.S. (2002). Chemical weed control in soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci. 34: 297–298.
  8. GoI (2013), “State-Wise Area Production and Yields Statistics (Major Crops, 2012-13)”, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.
  9. Herridge D.F., Peoples M.B. and Boddey R.M. (2008) Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311: 1–18.
  10. Keyser H.H. and Fudi L. (1992). Potential for increasing biological nitrogen fixation in soybean. Plant Soil 141:119-135.
  11. Kundu R., Brahmachari K., Bera P.S., Kundu C.K. and Choudhury S.R. (2011). Bioefficacy of imazethapyr on the predominant weeds in soybean. J. Crop Weed 7(2): 173-178.
  12. Mani V.S., Malla M.L., Gautam K.C. and Bhagwndas (1973). Weed killing chemicals in potato cultivation. Indian Farm. 59(12): 17-18
  13. Masoumeh Y., Das T.K. and Sharma A.R. (2013). Effect of tillage and tank-mix herbicide application on weed management in soybean (Glycine max). Indian J. Agron. 58(3): 372-378.
  14. Mosjidis J.A. and Wehtje G. (2011). Weed control in sunhemp and its ability to suppress weed growth. Crop Prot. 30: 70-73.
  15. Reddy G.S., Giri U. and Bandyopadhyay P. (2013). Bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity of imazethapyr on the predominant weeds in soybean (Glysine max L.). J. Crop Weed 9(2):203-206.
  16. Singh R.P., Verma S.K., Singh R.K. and Idnani L.K. (2014). Influence of sowing dates and weed management on weed growth and nutrients depletion by weeds and uptake by chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under rainfed condition. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 84(4): 468-472.
  17. SOPA (2015). The Soybean Processors Association of India. Access on http://www.sopa.org/ 
  18. Tiwari D.K., Kewat M.L., Khan J.A. and Khamparia N.K. (2007). Evaluation of efficacy of post emergence herbicides in soybean. Indian J. Agron. 52(1): 74-86.
  19. Tiwari S.P. (2014). Raising the yield ceilings in soybean – an Indian overview. Soybean Res. 12(2): 01-43.
  20. Upadhyay V.B., Bharti V. and Rawat A. (2012). Bioefficacy of post-emergence herbicides in Soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci. 44(4): 261-263.
  21. Vollmann J., Wagentristl H. and Hartl W. (2010). The effects of simulated weed pressure on early maturity soybeans. Eur. J. Agron. 32: 243-248.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)