Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 42 issue 1 (february 2019) : 90-95,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3851

Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system

J
Jeetendra Kumar Soni
N
N. Asoka Raja
V
Vimal Kumar
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641003, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • Submitted11-02-2017|

  • Accepted11-08-2017|

  • First Online 15-02-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3851

Cite article:- Soni Kumar Jeetendra, Raja Asoka N., Kumar Vimal (2018). Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. Legume Research. 42(1): 90-95. doi: 10.18805/LR-3851.

ABSTRACT

A field investigation was carried out in farmer’s field at Pudhupalayam, TNAU, Coimbatore, during 2015, to improve the productivity of groundnut variety TMV 13 under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications comprising of 11 treatments. Results indicated that maximum pod yield (3495 kg ha-1), haulm yield (6452 kg ha-1), harvest index (0.351) and shelling per cent (73.95 per cent) were obtained with drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1).  The water saving achieved under drip irrigation was 40.08% and 55.06% at 100% and 75% PE, respectively, whereas, under micro-sprinkler, it was 25.10% and 43.83% at 100% and 75% PE, respectively over surface irrigation. Higher WUE of 19.28 kg/ha-mm recorded under drip irrigation at 75% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T2) followed by drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1: 15.88 kg/ha-mm). Highest NUE (23.30 kg kg-1 NPK ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1). Drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1) recorded higher gross return (Rs. 254353 ha-1) and net return (Rs.134712 ha-1). Whereas, the benefit cost ratio was highest in micro sprinkler at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T6: 2.41). The margin benefit cost ratio (MBCR) was recorded highest under micro sprinkler at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T6: 2.53) as compared to all other treatments.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (2017). Area, production and productivity of groundnut in India and Tamil Nadu. https://www.indiastat.com/table/    agriculture/2/groundnut/19575/40535/data.aspx.
  2. El- Boraie, F.M., Abo-El-Ela, H.K. and Gaber, A.M. (2009). Water requirements of peanut grown in sandy soil under drip irrigation and biofertilization. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 55-65.
  3. El-Habbasha, S.F., Okasha, E.M., Abdelraouf, R.E. and Mohammed, A.S.H. (2014). Effect of pressured irrigation systems, deficit irrigation and fertigation rates on yield, quality and water use efficiency of groundnut. International Journal of Chemical Technology Research, 07(01): 475-487.
  4. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. John Wiley Sons, New York. Pp. 680.
  5. Gupta, A.J., Feza Ahmad, M. and Bhat, F.N. (2010). Studies on yield, quality, water and fertilizer use efficiency of capsicum under drip irrigation and fertigation. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 67(2): 213-218.
  6. Jain, N.K. and Meena, H.N. (2015). Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 60(1): 109-115.
  7. Krishnamurthi, V.V., Manickasundaram, P., Vaiyapuri, K. and Gnanamurthy, P. (2003). Microsprinkler - A boon for groundnut crop, Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar. Madras Agricultural Journal, 90(1-3): 57-59.
  8. Loganathan, S. and Krishnamoorthy, K.K. (1977). Total uptake of nutrients at different stages of the growth of groundnut and the ratios in which various nutrient elements exist in groundnut plant. Plant and Soil, 46: 565-570.
  9. Mathukia, R.K., Sagarka, B.K. and Davaria, R.L. (2014). Evaluation of micro-Irrigation, fertigation and weed management in summer groundnut. Innovare Journal of Agriculture Science, 2(2): 1-2.
  10. Palaniappan, S.P. (1985). Cropping Systems in the Tropics - Principles and Management, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, p. 215.
  11. Rank, H.D. (2007). Summer groundnut crop performance and economics under micro sprinkler irrigation at various water application levels. Legume Research, 30(4): 261-265.
  12. Sameerkumar, D., Jayadeva, H.M., Jagadish, Chandrakant and Siddappa. (2016) Effect of micro sprinkler fertigation on yield, nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency and economics of groundnut. Advances in Life Sciences, 5(8): 3421-3425.
  13. Shivanand, H.K., Santosh, D.T., Madhusudhan, M.S. and Anilkumar Mane. (2012). Effect of micro irrigation on growth and yield of tomato under clay loam soil. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 2(3-4): 60-64.
  14. Srijita Paul, Mudalagiriyappa, Ramachandrappa, B.K., Nagaraju and Basavaraja, P.K. (2016). Influence of water soluble and normal fertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Green Farming, 7(2): 397-400.
  15. Vijayalakshmi, R., Veerabadran, V., Shanmugasundram, K. and Kumar, V. (2011). Micro-sprinkler irrigation and fustigation and land configuration as a best management technology package for groundnut. In: 8th International Micro Irrigation Congress Innovation in Technology and Management of Micro-irrigation for Crop Production Enhancement 21 October 2011, Tehran, Iran, Pp: 200-207. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 42 issue 1 (february 2019) : 90-95,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3851

    Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system

    J
    Jeetendra Kumar Soni
    N
    N. Asoka Raja
    V
    Vimal Kumar
    1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641003, Tamil Nadu, India.

    • Submitted11-02-2017|

    • Accepted11-08-2017|

    • First Online 15-02-2018|

    • doi 10.18805/LR-3851

    Cite article:- Soni Kumar Jeetendra, Raja Asoka N., Kumar Vimal (2018). Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. Legume Research. 42(1): 90-95. doi: 10.18805/LR-3851.

    ABSTRACT

    A field investigation was carried out in farmer’s field at Pudhupalayam, TNAU, Coimbatore, during 2015, to improve the productivity of groundnut variety TMV 13 under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications comprising of 11 treatments. Results indicated that maximum pod yield (3495 kg ha-1), haulm yield (6452 kg ha-1), harvest index (0.351) and shelling per cent (73.95 per cent) were obtained with drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1).  The water saving achieved under drip irrigation was 40.08% and 55.06% at 100% and 75% PE, respectively, whereas, under micro-sprinkler, it was 25.10% and 43.83% at 100% and 75% PE, respectively over surface irrigation. Higher WUE of 19.28 kg/ha-mm recorded under drip irrigation at 75% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T2) followed by drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1: 15.88 kg/ha-mm). Highest NUE (23.30 kg kg-1 NPK ha-1) was recorded in drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1). Drip irrigation at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T1) recorded higher gross return (Rs. 254353 ha-1) and net return (Rs.134712 ha-1). Whereas, the benefit cost ratio was highest in micro sprinkler at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T6: 2.41). The margin benefit cost ratio (MBCR) was recorded highest under micro sprinkler at 100% PE with fertigation at 100% RDF as WSF (T6: 2.53) as compared to all other treatments.

    REFERENCES

    1. Anonymous. (2017). Area, production and productivity of groundnut in India and Tamil Nadu. https://www.indiastat.com/table/    agriculture/2/groundnut/19575/40535/data.aspx.
    2. El- Boraie, F.M., Abo-El-Ela, H.K. and Gaber, A.M. (2009). Water requirements of peanut grown in sandy soil under drip irrigation and biofertilization. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 55-65.
    3. El-Habbasha, S.F., Okasha, E.M., Abdelraouf, R.E. and Mohammed, A.S.H. (2014). Effect of pressured irrigation systems, deficit irrigation and fertigation rates on yield, quality and water use efficiency of groundnut. International Journal of Chemical Technology Research, 07(01): 475-487.
    4. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. John Wiley Sons, New York. Pp. 680.
    5. Gupta, A.J., Feza Ahmad, M. and Bhat, F.N. (2010). Studies on yield, quality, water and fertilizer use efficiency of capsicum under drip irrigation and fertigation. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 67(2): 213-218.
    6. Jain, N.K. and Meena, H.N. (2015). Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by using water soluble fertilizer through drip irrigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 60(1): 109-115.
    7. Krishnamurthi, V.V., Manickasundaram, P., Vaiyapuri, K. and Gnanamurthy, P. (2003). Microsprinkler - A boon for groundnut crop, Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar. Madras Agricultural Journal, 90(1-3): 57-59.
    8. Loganathan, S. and Krishnamoorthy, K.K. (1977). Total uptake of nutrients at different stages of the growth of groundnut and the ratios in which various nutrient elements exist in groundnut plant. Plant and Soil, 46: 565-570.
    9. Mathukia, R.K., Sagarka, B.K. and Davaria, R.L. (2014). Evaluation of micro-Irrigation, fertigation and weed management in summer groundnut. Innovare Journal of Agriculture Science, 2(2): 1-2.
    10. Palaniappan, S.P. (1985). Cropping Systems in the Tropics - Principles and Management, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, p. 215.
    11. Rank, H.D. (2007). Summer groundnut crop performance and economics under micro sprinkler irrigation at various water application levels. Legume Research, 30(4): 261-265.
    12. Sameerkumar, D., Jayadeva, H.M., Jagadish, Chandrakant and Siddappa. (2016) Effect of micro sprinkler fertigation on yield, nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency and economics of groundnut. Advances in Life Sciences, 5(8): 3421-3425.
    13. Shivanand, H.K., Santosh, D.T., Madhusudhan, M.S. and Anilkumar Mane. (2012). Effect of micro irrigation on growth and yield of tomato under clay loam soil. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 2(3-4): 60-64.
    14. Srijita Paul, Mudalagiriyappa, Ramachandrappa, B.K., Nagaraju and Basavaraja, P.K. (2016). Influence of water soluble and normal fertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Green Farming, 7(2): 397-400.
    15. Vijayalakshmi, R., Veerabadran, V., Shanmugasundram, K. and Kumar, V. (2011). Micro-sprinkler irrigation and fustigation and land configuration as a best management technology package for groundnut. In: 8th International Micro Irrigation Congress Innovation in Technology and Management of Micro-irrigation for Crop Production Enhancement 21 October 2011, Tehran, Iran, Pp: 200-207. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)