Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 41 issue 3 (june 2018) : 461-467,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3782

Refinement and evaluation of artificial diet for rearing of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Geyer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) 

V
V. Rachappa
S
S.G. Hanchinal
C
Chandra Shekhara
S
Sweta surpur
B
B.V. Patil
R
R.K. Seth
S
Suhas yelshetty
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi-585101, Karnataka, India.

  • Submitted20-09-2016|

  • Accepted26-12-2016|

  • First Online 18-09-2017|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3782

Cite article:- Rachappa V., Hanchinal S.G., Shekhara Chandra, surpur Sweta, Patil B.V., Seth R.K., yelshetty Suhas (2017). Refinement and evaluation of artificial diet for rearing of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Geyer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Legume Research. 41(3): 461-467. doi: 10.18805/LR-3782.

ABSTRACT

The investigation on refinement and evaluation of artificial diet for M. vitrata, were carried out during 2014 and 2015 under walk in plant growth chamber established at ARS, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India. Comparison of developmental parameters of three successive generations of M. vitrata reared on different diets revealed that, maximum survival of egg, larva and pupa was 78.4 ± 3.1, 67.6±5.5 and 73.0±5.0 respectively in modified D-OOD diet and was superior over rest of the diets (D-OOD, D-New and D-OO) while it was on par with natural host plant. Maximum fecundity of 62.34±4.1 eggs/female was observed in refined D-OOD diet was on par with pigeonpea host plant and superior over other diets. Biology studies of Maruca on refined artificial diet in comparison with natural host plant pigonpea were revealed that, incubation period (2.6 ± 0.46 and 2.85 ± 0.40 days), total larval duration (14.28± 1.02 and 14.78±1.52 days), pupal period (9.41±0.70 days and 10.33±1.08 days) did not vary significantly between modified diet and natural host. Fecundity in refined artificial diet was 66.00 ± 4.00 and it was 65.99± 7.02 eggs on natural host plant. Per cent egg hatching was almost same in both the cases. 

REFERENCES

  1. Baramappa. (2015). Development of mass multiplication techniques for Maruca vitrata (Geyer). M. Sc.Thesis Submitted to the University of Agriculutral Sciences, Raichur. 85p
  2. Chaitanya, T., Sreedevi, K., Navatha, L., Murali, K. T. and Prasanti, L. (2012). Bionomics and population dynamics of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Cajanus cajana (L.) Millsp. Curr. Biotica, 5: 446-453.
  3. Chandrayudu, E. (2003). Studies on spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer), M.Sc. (Ag.)., Thesis submitted to the Achrya N. G. Ranga Agric., Univ., Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.
  4. Gopali, J. B. Raju Teggelli,. Mannur D. M and Suhas Yelshetty. (2010). Web-forming lepidopteran, Maruca vitrata (Geyer): an emerging and destructive pest in pigeonpea, Karnataka J. Agril. Sci, 23(1) : 35-38
  5. Kanhere, R.D., Patel V.N., Umbarkar P.S., and Kakde A.M. (2012). Bio-efficacy of different insecticides against spotted pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer) infesting cowpea. Legume Res., 35 (1): 44 – 46
  6. Liu, C. Y and Hwang, J. S. (2006). Rearing of the legume-pod borer (Maruca vitrata) on an improved semi-synthetic artificial diet. Plant Prot. Bull., 48: 9-16. 
  7. Naveen, N., Naik, M. I., Manjunath. M., Pradeep. S., Shivanna, B. K. and Sridhar, S. (2009). Biology of legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer) on cowpea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22: 668-669.
  8. Ochieng, R. S., Okeyo-Owuor, J. B. and Dabrowski, Z. T. (1981). Studies on the legume pod borer Maruca testulalis (Geyer)-2. Mass rearing on natural food, Insect Sci. and its Applic., 3: 269-272.
  9. Okeyo-Owuor, J. B. and Ochieng, R. S. (1981). Studies on legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis Geyer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on a semi-synthetic diet. Insect Sci. and its Applic., 14: 719-722.
  10. Onyango, F. O. and Ochieng-Odero, J. P R. (1993). Laboratory rearing of the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis Geyer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on a semi- synthetic diet. Insect Sci. and its Applic., 14: 719-722.
  11. Randhawa H.S. and Saini. M.K. (2015). Efficacy of different insecticides against pod borer, (Maruca vitrata Geyer) in pigeonpea, Legume Res. 38: 687-690
  12. Sahoo, B. K. (1995). Extent of damage by web forming lepidopteran pod borers in pigeonpea. Indian J. Pulse Res., 2: 195-196.
  13. Shanower, T. G., Romies, J. and Minja, E. M. (1999). Insect pests of pigeonpea and their management. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 44: 77-96.
  14. Sharma, H. C. (1998). Bionomics, host plant resistance, and management of the legume pod bore, Maruca vitrata. Crop Prot., 17: 373-386. 
  15. Sonune, V.R., Bharodia R.K., Jethva D.M. and Gaikwad S.E.. (2010). Life cycle of spotted pod borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer) on blackgram, Legume Res., 33 (1) : 28 – 32.
  16. Sureja, B. V., Pachani, B. G. and Khanpara, A. V. (2010). Biology of Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer) on cowpea. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 1(4): 477-478.
  17. Taylor, T. A. (1963). The field pest problem on cowpea in southern Nigeria. First Nigerian Grain Legume Conf., Nigeria, pp: 1-80. 
  18. Wang, P., Lu, P. F., Zheng, X, L., Chen, L. Z., Lei, C. L. and Wang, X. P. (2013). New artificial diet for continuous rearing of bean pod borer, Maruca virata, J. Insect Sci., 13:121. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)