Screening for high productive salt tolerant mutant M4 lines in chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)
 

DOI: 10.18805/LR-3749    | Article Id: LR-3749 | Page : 356-362
Citation :- Screening for high productive salt tolerant mutant M4 lines in chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.).Legume Research-An International Journal.2018.(41):356-362
Mousumi Das and Saby asachi Kundagrami skundagrami@gmail.com
Address : Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Science, University of Calcutta, 51/2 Hazra Road, Kolkata-700 019, West Bengal, India.
Submitted Date : 6-07-2016
Accepted Date : 14-12-2016

Abstract

Genetic improvement through induced mutation has been very effective in improvement of crops. Seeds of three popular chickpea variety namely BGM 408, B115 and JG 315 were treated with 10,20 and 30 kR of gamma rays. Then treated seeds with their respective control(0 kR gamma rays) were sown in the field of Calcutta University experimental farm,Baruipur (with no salinity) in three consecutive years to raise M1, M2 and M3 generations respectively.Some M3 lines having higher yield potential were subjected to grow as M4 lines in salt stressed field (5-7ds m-1) of Hingalganj,South 24 Parganas. Finally, some promising salt tolerant lines with improved seed yield were selected which have a good promise for coastal saline belt after releasing as a variety.

Keywords

Chickpea Gamma rays Induced mutation Salinity Seed yield

References

  1. Acharaya,S.N.,Thomoas,J.E., and Basu S.K. (2007). Improvement in the medicinal and nutritional properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.).In: [Acharaya S.N, Thomas JE (Eds)] Advances in Medicinal Plant Research, Research Signspot, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  2. Ahmad,B. and Yaqoob,M.(1993a) Radiation for induced mutation in mugbean (Vigna radiata L Wilczek). Sarhod Journal of Agriculture 9 (5):423-427
  3. Bentota, A.P. (2006). Mutation improvement of rice variety BW-267-3 for red pericarp grains and lodging resistance. Plant mutation reports. International atomic energy agency, Vienna, Austria.1: 42- 43.
  4. Chopra, V.L. (2005). Mutagenesis :Investigating the process and processing the outcome for crop improvement . Current Science. 89(2): 353-359.
  5. Gunckel,J.K.and Sparrow, A.H. (1961). Ionizing radiations: biochemical, physiological and morphological aspects of their effects on plants. Encyl. Plant.physiol., 16:555-611.
  6. Khan, S., Siddigal, B.A. and Vadeen, M. (1993). Variation in quantitative characters of mugbean after red treatment with DIS; Adraus in Plant Symmces 7(1):41-45
  7. Kharkwal, M.C.(1998). Induced mutation for improvement of protein in chickpea. Indian J Genet, 58(1):61-68
  8. Pathania, A. and Sood, B.C. (2007). Comparative effectiveness and efficiency of physical and chemical mutagens in chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.) Legume Res. 30(3):186-191
  9. Popa, V.V. (1991). Effect of chemical mutagens and pestisides on genetical characters in gram legume. Baletinal Academici de Stiinite A Republicii Moldhva.Stiinte Biologica Si Chinica 5:22-26
  10. Sharma, S.W and Sharma, B. (1982). Differential manifestation of maize mutations for different quantitative characters in lentil. Genetica,14(B):285-293
  11. Singh,G.V.,Richhiaria,A.W and Joshi, A.W. (1998). An assessment of ã ray induced mutants in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Indian J. Genetics,58(4):455-463
  12. Singh,V.P and Yadav,R.D.S. (1991). Induced mutations for quantitative and qualitative traits in greengram(Vigna radiata L.Wilczck) CV.T44. Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding . 45(1):1-5
  13. Sinha,A.,Lal,J.P. (2007). Effect of mutagens on M1 parameters and quantitative changes induced in M2 generation in Lentil. Legume Res.,30(3):180-185
  14. Sinha, R.D. and Bharati, R. (1990). Variability in mutant populations in Urdbean ( Vigna mungo L.Hepper). Jounal of Nuclear Agriculture and Bilology .19:44-46.
  15. Srivastava, L. S., H. Chand, and S. Kumar. (1973). Dose response studies on EMS and MMS treated gram. Sci. Cul. 39(8), 345-347

Global Footprints