Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 2 (april 2018) : 259-262

Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to irrigation and hydrogel application in Vertisols 

S.P. Halagalimath, S. Rajkumara
1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dharwad University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.

  • Submitted01-06-2016|

  • Accepted04-08-2017|

  • First Online 23-01-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3735

Cite article:- Halagalimath S.P., Rajkumara S. (2018). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to irrigation and hydrogel application in Vertisols. Legume Research. 41(2): 259-262. doi: 10.18805/LR-3735.

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at Irrigation Water Management Research Centre (IWMRC) Belavatgi, Navalgund taluk of Dharwad district under Vertisols during rabi 2013-15 to study the effect of irrigation and hydrogel application on chickpea varieties in Malaprabha Command area. Irrigation effects were non significant,  however irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE + 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded higher grain yield (2136 kg ha-1) as compared to irrigation scheduled at 0.6 IW/CPE (2087 kg ha-1) and 0.4 IW/CPE (2025 kg ha-1). It also recorded significantly higher WUE (13.34 kg/ha mm) over 0.6 IW/CPE (8.15 kg/ha mm). Among the varieties ‘JG-11’ recorded significantly higher grain yields (2309 kg ha-1) over other varieties, however they did not affect the WUE. Interaction effect of irrigation levels and varieties was significant for grain yield and WUE. ‘A-1’, ‘JG-11’ and ‘JAKI-9218’ varieties with 2.5 kg ha-1 hydrogel recorded significantly higher WUE and were on par. ‘JG-11’ variety with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded higher gross returns (Rs. 92660/ha), net returns (Rs. 69800/ha) and B:C ratio (3.05).

REFERENCES

  1. Akhter, J., Mahmood, K., Malik, K.A., Mardan, A., Ahmad, A. and Iqbal, M.M. (2004). Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam amd loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea Plant and Environ., 50:463-469.
  2. Anonymous.(2013). Area, production, and average yield, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation report, New Delhi, available on the website: http:// www.agricoop.nic.in
  3. El Hady, O.A. and Wanas, S.A. (2006). Water and fertilizer use efficiency by cucumber grown under stress on sandy soil treated with Acrylamide Hydrogels. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 12: 1293-1297.
  4. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agriculture Research, 2nd Ed., John Willey and Sons, New York,680pp.
  5. Mansur, C.P. (2003). Agrotechniques to enhance the kabuli chickpea productivity in Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka. Ph. D. Thesis, University of. Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. 
  6. Mirza, H., Quazi, A. and Kamrun, N. (2007). Yield Performance of Chickpea Varieties Following Application of Growth Regulator. American-Eurasian J. of Sci. and Res., 2: 117-120. 
  7. Nagarajaiah, K.M. (2004). Response of chickpea varieties to seed rate and time of sowing under late sown condition in Malaprabha command area. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
  8. Rajkumara, S., Gundlur, S.S., Neelakanth, J.K. and Ashoka, P.. (2014). Impact of irrigation and crop residue management on maize-    chickpea sequence under no tillage condition. Indian J. of Agric. Sci., 84: 43-48.
  9. Rohit Kumar (2015). Evaluation of hydrogel on the performance of rabi maize (Zea mays L.). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis. Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)