Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 41 issue 2 (april 2018) : 263-266,   Doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9103

Biochemical and physiological studies on Rhizobium inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar  grown in eastern U.P.

H
Harendra Singh
M
Mritunjay Tripathi
P
Pratibha Singh
R
Rajan Pratap Singh
1Department of Biochemistry, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad-224 229, Uttar Pradesh, India
Cite article:- Singh Harendra, Tripathi Mritunjay, Singh Pratibha, Singh Pratap Rajan (2017). Biochemical and physiological studies on Rhizobium inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar grown in eastern U.P.. Legume Research. 41(2): 263-266. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9103.

ABSTRACT

Health promoting biochemical parameters of fifteen distinct chickpea cultivar (Desi and Kabuli) showed wide variability in their biochemical and physiological composition, malic acid content, days to 50% flowering, primary branches per plant, number of pods per plant. Malic acid content polled mean  ranged from 0.40 to 0.49 % in control, rhizobium inoculated 0.46 to 0.54% and 0.42 to 0.50% in control, rhizobium inoculated 0.49 to 0.54 % at 45 DAS and 90 DAS respectively, pooled mean primary branches per plant in different genotypes ranged from 4.45 to 5.70 in control and 4.90 to 6.45 in rhizobium inoculated chickpea genotypes, days to 50% flowering in chickpea ranged from 75.00-87.00 days in control, rhizobium inoculated 75.00-86.00 days, number of pods per plant in chickpea ranged from 21.98-62.91 in control, rhizobium inoculated 26.85-73.02. The research result about the biochemical characteristics of control and rhizobium inoculated chickpea genotypes are expected to provide guidelines for the researches confronted with the need to use such typical food seed in India as well as in the rest of the world.

REFERENCES

  1. A.O.A.C. (1970). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C., 11th ed.
  2. Ali, N., Seyed, S.R., Teymur, K. (2011). Growth analysis and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in relation to organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilization. Ekologija, 57(3):97.
  3. F.A.O (2005). Year Book. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. 
  4. Koundal, K.R. and Sinha, S.K. (2006). Evaluation of the significance of malic acid secretion in chickpea. Physiology Planturm, 58: 189-192.
  5. Qureshi, A.S.; Shaukat A., Bakhsh. A., Arshad. M. and Ghafoor. A. (2004). An assessment of variability for economically important trait in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pak. J. Bot. 36 (4): 779-785.
  6. Shah, T.M., Atta, B.M., Haq. M.A. and Mirza. J.I. (2012). Induced genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). IV. Spectrum of morphological mutations Pakistan J. Bot. 43 (4): 2039-2043.
  7. Sehiralis, S. (1988). Yemeklik Dane Bakiagiller. A.U. Ziratt Fakultesi Yayinlari:1089, Ankara, 435.
  8. Togay N., Togay Y., Cimrin K. M., Turan M (2008). Effect of Rhizobium inoculation, sulfur and phosphorus application on yield, yield components and nutrient uptake in chick pea (Cicer aretinum L.) // African Journal of Biotechnology. 7(6): 776–782
  9. William, P.C. and Singh, U. (1987). Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programmes pp. 329-356. In The Chickpea (Ede Mc Saxena and K.B. Singh), CAB International/ICARDA, Wallingford, U.K.
  10. Wealth of India (1950). A Dictionary of Indian raw Materials and Industrial Products; 11: 154 Pub. C.S.1 R., New Delhi.
  11. Yadav, S.S., Redden, R.J., Chem. W. and Sharma. B. (2007). Chickpea Breeding and Management. CABI, p.101. 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 41 issue 2 (april 2018) : 263-266,   Doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9103

    Biochemical and physiological studies on Rhizobium inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar  grown in eastern U.P.

    H
    Harendra Singh
    M
    Mritunjay Tripathi
    P
    Pratibha Singh
    R
    Rajan Pratap Singh
    1Department of Biochemistry, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad-224 229, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Cite article:- Singh Harendra, Tripathi Mritunjay, Singh Pratibha, Singh Pratap Rajan (2017). Biochemical and physiological studies on Rhizobium inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivar grown in eastern U.P.. Legume Research. 41(2): 263-266. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9103.

    ABSTRACT

    Health promoting biochemical parameters of fifteen distinct chickpea cultivar (Desi and Kabuli) showed wide variability in their biochemical and physiological composition, malic acid content, days to 50% flowering, primary branches per plant, number of pods per plant. Malic acid content polled mean  ranged from 0.40 to 0.49 % in control, rhizobium inoculated 0.46 to 0.54% and 0.42 to 0.50% in control, rhizobium inoculated 0.49 to 0.54 % at 45 DAS and 90 DAS respectively, pooled mean primary branches per plant in different genotypes ranged from 4.45 to 5.70 in control and 4.90 to 6.45 in rhizobium inoculated chickpea genotypes, days to 50% flowering in chickpea ranged from 75.00-87.00 days in control, rhizobium inoculated 75.00-86.00 days, number of pods per plant in chickpea ranged from 21.98-62.91 in control, rhizobium inoculated 26.85-73.02. The research result about the biochemical characteristics of control and rhizobium inoculated chickpea genotypes are expected to provide guidelines for the researches confronted with the need to use such typical food seed in India as well as in the rest of the world.

    REFERENCES

    1. A.O.A.C. (1970). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C., 11th ed.
    2. Ali, N., Seyed, S.R., Teymur, K. (2011). Growth analysis and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in relation to organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilization. Ekologija, 57(3):97.
    3. F.A.O (2005). Year Book. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. 
    4. Koundal, K.R. and Sinha, S.K. (2006). Evaluation of the significance of malic acid secretion in chickpea. Physiology Planturm, 58: 189-192.
    5. Qureshi, A.S.; Shaukat A., Bakhsh. A., Arshad. M. and Ghafoor. A. (2004). An assessment of variability for economically important trait in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pak. J. Bot. 36 (4): 779-785.
    6. Shah, T.M., Atta, B.M., Haq. M.A. and Mirza. J.I. (2012). Induced genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). IV. Spectrum of morphological mutations Pakistan J. Bot. 43 (4): 2039-2043.
    7. Sehiralis, S. (1988). Yemeklik Dane Bakiagiller. A.U. Ziratt Fakultesi Yayinlari:1089, Ankara, 435.
    8. Togay N., Togay Y., Cimrin K. M., Turan M (2008). Effect of Rhizobium inoculation, sulfur and phosphorus application on yield, yield components and nutrient uptake in chick pea (Cicer aretinum L.) // African Journal of Biotechnology. 7(6): 776–782
    9. William, P.C. and Singh, U. (1987). Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programmes pp. 329-356. In The Chickpea (Ede Mc Saxena and K.B. Singh), CAB International/ICARDA, Wallingford, U.K.
    10. Wealth of India (1950). A Dictionary of Indian raw Materials and Industrial Products; 11: 154 Pub. C.S.1 R., New Delhi.
    11. Yadav, S.S., Redden, R.J., Chem. W. and Sharma. B. (2007). Chickpea Breeding and Management. CABI, p.101. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Legume Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)