Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 40 issue 6 (december 2017) : 1053-1059

Stability analysis in pole type beans (P. vulgaris) under temperate conditions

Fayaz A. Sheikh, Shabir H. Wani, Parvaze A. Sofi, Zahoor A. Dar, M.N. Khan
1<p>Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding,&nbsp;Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-K Wadura, Sopore-193 201, Jammu&amp; Kashmir, India.</p>
Cite article:- Sheikh A. Fayaz, Wani H. Shabir, Sofi A. Parvaze, Dar A. Zahoor, Khan M.N. (2017). Stability analysis in pole type beans (P. vulgaris) under temperate conditions . Legume Research. 40(6): 1053-1059. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7846.

The present investigation was undertaken during 2012-2014 to generate information through evaluation of the set of materials (breeding material, germplasm lines and other varieties at the farmers’ field along with the farmers’ variety as a check through stability using Eberhart and Russel Model. Trials were laid at various locations of three districts summing to a three mother trials with one grand mother trial at the research station. The yield and yield attributing traits of all genotypes were taken on ten competitive plants of both grand mother and mother trial. The genotypes WB-83 and WB-258 were selected and preferred by the farmers across locations. The genotypes were evaluated for stability analysis and showed divergence across locations. The mean squares of all the traits were significant reflecting that the material was genetically divergent. The pooled deviation was significant and the variance due to variety × environment was significant for various traits indicating that the variation in the performance of the genotypes is both unpredictable and predictable. Most of the genotypes were having higher mean than the average, bi less than unity indicating that the varieties were more specifically adapted to the unfavorable environments than favourable ones. Some of the genotypes having higher mean yield, bi > 1 and S2di tending to zero were specifically adapted to favourable environments. On the basis of stability parameters genotypes WB-83 and WB-258 were identified as the most stable genotypes for seed yield per plot across all locations on the basis of high mean performance and non-significant estimates of bi and S2di from unit and zero respectively, however latter genotype showed sensitivity to better environments for biological yield on the basis of significant bi estimates. Similarly these genotypes were identified as consistent for early flowering for all the locations.

  1. Ahmad, J., Choudhry, M.H., Salah-ud-Din, S. and Ali, M.A., (1996). Stability for grain yield in wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 28: 61-65.

  2. Asfaw, A., Blair, M. W., (2014). Quantification of drought tolerance in Ethiopian common bean varieties. Agrl. Sci. 5:124-139.

  3. Becker, H.C. and Leon, J., (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101 : 1-23.

  4. Chakroun, M., Taliaferro, C.M. and McNew, R.W., (1990). Genotype-environment interactions of Bermuda grass forage yields. Journal Article 55188 of the agric. Exp. Stn., Oklahoma State Univ.

  5. Eberhart, S.A. and Russel, W.A., (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6 : 36-40.

  6. Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N., (1963). Analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agrl. Res. 14: 742-754.

  7. Huhn, M., (1966). Non-parametric analysis of G × E interactions by ranks. Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, New York, pp. 416.

  8. Khalifa, G.E., Maarouf, E.M., Osman, M.E. and Elsadig, S.M., (2013). Yield stability in common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the Sudan. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 5: 203-208.

  9. Kour, M., Thakur, N.P., Kumar, P. and Charak, A.S., (2016). Productivity and profitability of maize (Zea mays) as influenced by intercropping of raj mash (Phaseolus vulgaris) and nutrient management techniques under sub-alpine conditions of Jammu, India. Legume Res. 39(6): 970-975.

  10. Kumara, B.N, Dharmaraj, P.S, Kuchnur, P.H, Muniswamy, S., Yamanura, Diwan, J.R. and Amresh, Y.S., (2016). Stability analyasis for yield and its attributing traits in advanced genotypes of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Legume Research, 39(2) 2016: 194-197

  11. Meena, S.K., Sastry, E.D., Rajput, S.S. and Pandey, Y., (2015). Stability of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for terminal heat and water stress. Legume Res.38 (5), 589-597.

  12. Mohammed, Y.A., Chen, C., McPhee, K., Miller, P., McVay, K., Eckhoff, J., Lamb, P., Miller, J., Khan, Q., Bohannon, B. and Knox, M., (2016). Yield performance and stability of dry pea and lentil genotypes in semi-arid cereal dominated cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 188: 31-40.

  13. Moldovan, V., Moldovan, M. and Kadar, R., (2000). Phenotypic stability for yield in chickpea. Pak J. Sci. Res. 30: 455-465.

  14. Musaana, S., Ugen-Adrogu, M. and Mawejje, D., (2015). Yield stability of some bush snap Bean genotypes in Uganda. Dir. Res. J. Agric. Food Sci. 3(4) : 74-82.

  15. Shukla, G.K.,(1972) Some statistical aspects of partioning genotype- environmental components of variability. Heredity 29 : 237-245

  16. Temesgen, D., Wondimu, F., Kasahun, Z., Wogayehu, W., Takele, N. and Tariku, H., (2008). Weed Management research on maize in Ethiopia. In : Proceedings of the 3rd National Maize workshop of Ethiopia.18-20 April (2008), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 128-133.

  17. Tiwari, G., Singh, K. and Singh, N.K., (2016). Stability analysis for various quantitative traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Legume Res. 39(4).517-522 

Editorial Board

View all (0)