Influence of pigeonpea varieties, N levels and planting methods on yield and economics under rainfed conditions

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7291    | Article Id: LR-3719 | Page : 911-915
Citation :- Influence of pigeonpea varieties, N levels and planting methodson yield and economics under rainfed conditions .Legume Research-An International Journal.2017.(40):911-915

A.V. Ramanjaneyulu, K. Indudhar Reddy, P. Spandana Bhatt, T.L. Neelima and A. Srinivas

avr_agron@rediffmail.com
Address :

Regional Agricultural Research Station, (Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University), 
Palem-509 215, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.

Submitted Date : 21-04-2016
Accepted Date : 12-08-2016

Abstract

An experiment was conducted with the objective of understanding the response of pigeonpea varieties to N levels under different method of planting. It consisted of 16 treatments with four methods of planting in main plots, two varieties and two N levels in double split plot (DSP) design. The results of pooled data indicated that significantly higher plant population (50,683 ha-1) and seed yield (1255 kg ha-1) besides lower cost of cultivation (Rs. 27,875 ha-1), higher net returns (Rs. 33,698 ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.19) were recorded with normal planting (90x20 cm) compared to other planting methods. Transplanted pigeonpea (120x90 cm) had significantly higher stem girth (10.32 cm) and number of pods plant-1 (1483) besides on par seed yield (1100 kg ha-1) with that of normal planting. However, the yield improvement is not substantial to offset the additional costs involved in nursery raising and transplanting. Though the performance of transplanted pigeonpea (90x90 cm) and dibbling (90x90 cm) was similar with regard to seed yield, dibbling fared well with regard to net returns and B:C ratio. PRG-158 variety accrued an additional net returns of Rs. 2340 ha-1 over Asha, due to its short duration. N doses didn’t differ significantly in respect of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield. Thus, normal planting method (90x20 cm) with PRG-158 variety and 20 kg N ha-1 can be recommended on Alfisols under rainfed conditions. 
 

Keywords

Alfisols N levels Pigeonpea Planting methods Rainfed.

References

  1. Bhanu Kumar, M., Hulihalli, U.K., Arvind Kumar, B.N. and Meena, M.K. (2011). Effect of fertility and planting geometry on growth and yield of medium duration pigeonpea hybrid ICPH-2671. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 2:715-718.
  2. Dobermann, A.R.(2005). “Nitrogen Use Efficiency – State of the Art”. Agronomy - Faculty Publications. Paper 316. http:/    /digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/316.
  3. FAO STAT 2015. FAO Agricultural Statistics year book, Rome.
  4. Ghosh, P.K., Mohanty, M., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Painuli, D.K. and Misra, A.K. (2006). 
  5. Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Res., 96:90–97.
  6. Jat, R.A., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaiah, B.(2010). Effect of organic manure and sulphur fertilization in pigeonpea+groundnut intercropping system. Indian J. Agron., 55:276-281.
  7. Gowda, L., Sushil, K. Chaturvedi, Pooran, M. Gaur, Sameer Kumar, C.V. and Aravind, K.J. (2015). Pulses research and development strategies for India. Pulse year book-2015. 17-22.
  8. Mahajan, J.P., Dumbre, A.D. and Bhingarde, M.T. (1997). Effect of environment, fertilizers and plant density on seed yield and quality of pigeopea. J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 22:151-154.
  9. Mallikarjun, C., Hulihalli, U.K., Tuppad, G.B., Kambrekar, D.N. (2015a). Effect of different agrotechniques on pod borer, pod fly and productivity of pigeonpea under changing climate. J. Exp. Zool., 18: 789-794.
  10. Mallikarjun, C., Hulihalli, U.K. and Shantveerayya (2015b). Yield, yield parameters and economics of hybrid pigeonpea (cv. ICPH-2671) as influenced by planting methods and geometry. Int. J. Agric. Sci., 11:19-23.
  11. Narendra, K., Rajendra Prasad, S., Rakesh, K. and Hari Om (2013). Effect of integrated nutrient management on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agron., 58:309-315.
  12. Pavan, A.S., Nagalikar, V.P., Halepyati, A.S. and Pujari, B.T. (2009). Effect of planting on the yield, yield components and economics of transplanted pigeonpea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22:433-434.
  13. Pavan, A.S., Nagalikar, V.P., Pujari, B.T. and Halepyati, A.S. (2011). Influence of planting geometry on the growth characters, seed yield and economics of transplanted pigeonpea. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24:390-392. 
  14. Potdar, M.P., Chittapur, B.M., Salakinkoppa, S.R., Sharma, Arjun and Dharmraj, P.S. (2010). Response of transplanted pigeonpea (Cajanus cajana L.) to planting geometry under rainfed conditions of North Eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Nation. Symp. on “Resource Management Approaches towards Livelihood Security”, 2-4 December, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 
  15. Priyanka, K., Suresh, S., Patil, G., Hiremath, M., Amrutha, T., Joshi and Sunil, A.K. (2013). Comparative analysis of transplanted and dibbled method of redgram cultivation in Bidar district of Karnataka. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 26: 238-242.
  16. Quit, P. and Dalal, R.C. (2015). Effect of soil mineral N levels and inoculation on nodulation, nitrogenase activity and grain yield of pigeonpea. Agron. J., 71:450-452. 
  17. Salakinkoppa, S.R. and Patil, H.Y. (2010). Enhancing the productivity of pigeonpea by transplanting technique in command area. National symposium on “Food Security in Context of Changing Climate” held at Kanpur during October 30 to November 01 2010, pp.133.
  18. Srinivasan, K., Ramaswamy, M. and Vairavan, K. (1997). Spatial requirement of short duration redgram genotypes grown in Alfisols. Madras Agric. J., 84:390-391.
  19. Umesh, M.R., Shankar, M.A. and Ananda. (2013). Yield, nutrient uptake and economics of under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agron., 51:60-62.

Global Footprints