Effect of moisture content on biophysical characteristics of chickpea cultivars

DOI: 10.18805/LR-368    | Article Id: LR-368 | Page : 432-435
Citation :- Effect of moisture content on biophysical characteristics of chickpea cultivars.Legume Research.2018.(41):432-435
A. Biabani and S.J. Sajadi abs346@yahoo.com
Address : Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.
Submitted Date : 8-05-2017
Accepted Date : 15-11-2017


In order to study the effect of moisture on biophysical characteristics of different chickpea cultivars, a factorial experiment was conducted with two factors in a completely randomized block design. Factors included chickpea cultivars (Bionij, Azad and Hashem) and humidity at 4 levels (15%, 20%, 25% and 30%). This study was done with 50 repetitions in Gonbad-e Kavous University in 2013. Measured characteristics were length, width, thickness, geometric diameter, sphericity coefficient, volume and the coefficient of static friction. Results showed that, there are significant differences between the chickpea cultivars at all moisture levels for all studied characteristics. Also significant difference was found between moisture levels in different cultivars among all characteristics (except sphericity coefficient). Mean comparison of traits showed that, the highest amount of geometric diameter, the highest volume and maximum sphericity coefficient in different cultivars related to moisture content of 30%, 20% and 20% respectively. With increasing moisture, all measured parameters increased except sphericity coefficient. In addition Hashem cultivar is strongly influenced by increasing moisture in terms of grain volume and the geometric diameter.


Biophysical characteristics Chickpea Geometric diameter Moisture Sphericity.


  1. Arana, I. (2012). Physical Properties of Foods Novel Measurement Techniques and Applications. Taylor and Francis.
  2. Aviara, N. A. N., Power, P. P. P., and Abbas, T. (2013). Moisture-dependent physical properties of Moringa oleifera seed relevant in bulk handling and mechanical processing. Industrial Crops and Products, 42(1): 96-104.
  3. Bakhshabadi, H., Ghodsevali, A. R., Abdollahi, A., and Rashidzadeh, S. (2013). Effect of moisture content on physical properties of chickpea varieties of Golestan province. Journal of Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 5: 51-62.
  4. Gupta, R. K., and Das, S. K. (1997). Physical properties of sunflower seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66(1): 1–8.
  5. Hamdani, A., Rather, S. A., Shah, A., Gani, A., Wani, S. M., Masoodi, F. A., and Gani, A. (2014). Physical properties of barley and oats cultivars grown in high altitude Himalayan regions of India. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 8(4): 296–304.
  6. Karababa, E., and Coskuner, Y. (2013). Physical properties of carob bean (Ceratonia siliqua L.): An industrial gum yielding crop. Industrial Crops and Products, 42(1): 440–446. 
  7. Kibar, H. (2016). Determining the Functional Characteristics of Wheat and Corn Grains Depending on Storage Time and Temperature. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 40(4): 749–759. 
  8. Konak, M., Çarman, K., and Aydin, C. (2002). PH—Postharvest Technology: Physical properties of chick pea seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 82(1): 73–78. 
  9. Markowski, M., zuk-Go³aszewska, K., and Kwiatkowski, D. (2013). Influence of variety on selected physical and mechanical properties of wheat. Industrial Crops and Products, 47: 113–117. 
  10. Nikoobin, M., Mirdavardoost, F., Kashaninejad, M., and Soltani, A. (2009). Moisture-dependent physical properties of chickpea seeds. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 32(4): 544–564. 
  11. Sologubik, C. A., Campañone, L. A., Pagano, A. M., and Gely, M. C. (2013). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of barley. Industrial Crops and Products, 43(1): 762–767. 

Global Footprints