Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 40 issue 4 (august 2017) : 773-777

Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance as per cent of mean in Spanish bunch groundnut genotypes (Arachis hypogaea L.)

G.Bhargavi, V. Satyanarayana Rao, D. Ratna Babu
1<p>Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding,&nbsp;Agricultural College, Bapatla - 522 101, India</p>
Cite article:- G.Bhargavi, Rao Satyanarayana V., Babu Ratna D. (2017). Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance as per cent of mean in Spanish bunch groundnut genotypes (Arachis hypogaea L.) . Legume Research. 40(4): 773-777. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7848.

Twenty Spanish bunch groundnut genotypes were collected from Agriculture Research Station, Kadiri, Andhra Pradesh, along with the check TMV 2 were used to study their variability, heritability  and genetic advance as per cent of mean for nineteen characters viz., days to 50% flowering, SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) at 40, 50, 60, 70 DAS and at maturity, days to maturity, number of mature pods per plant, biological yield per plant (g), pod yield per plant (g), biological yield per hectare (q), pod yield per hectare (q), harvest index, 100 kernel weight (g), shelling percentage, kernel yield per plant (g), kernel yield per hectare (q), oil content (%) and oil yield per hectare (q) during summer 2013 at Agricultural College farm, Bapatla. The results revealed that the highest PCV and GCV were observed for number of mature pods per plant. High heritability accompanied with high genetic advance as per cent of mean was recorded for  number of mature pods per plant, biological yield per plant (g), pod yield per plant (g), biological yield per hectare (q), pod yield per hectare (q), kernel yield per plant (g), kernel yield per hectare (q), 100 kernel weight (g) and oil yield per hectare (q) indicating the preponderance of additive gene action which might be exploited through simple selection procedures. The study revealed that the genotypes Abhaya and JCG 88 were better for further breeding from yield point of view.


  1. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation). 2014. FAO Database. http://www.fao.org

  2. Hanson, W.O. (1963). In: Heritability in Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, [Hanson, W.O and Robinson, H.F. (eds.)], 1982. National Academy of Science and National Research Council, Washington D. C. pp. 125-139.

  3. John, K., Reddy, P.R., Reddy, P.H., Sudhakar, P and Reddy, N.P.E.(2011). Genetic analysis for water use efficiency traits, yield and yield attributes in groundnut. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2(3): 357-366.

  4. John, K., Vasanthi, R.P and Venkateswarlu, O.(2009). Studies on variability and character association in Spanish bunch groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Research. 32(1): 65-69.

  5. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F and Comstock, R.E.(1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 314-318.

  6. Korat, V.P., Pithia, M.S., Savaliya, J.J and Sodavadiya, P.R.(2009). Studies on genetic variability in different genotypes of groundnut. Legume Research. 32(3): 224-226. 

  7. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. 2013-14. http://www.indiastat.com.

  8. Nandini, C., Savithramma, D.L and Naresh Babu, N. (2011). Genetic variability analysis for surrogate traits of water use efficiency in F8 recombinant inbred lines of the cross NRCG 12568 x NRCG 1236 in groundnut. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2(4): 555-558.

  9. Prasanna, R.A., Sekhar, R.M., Raja, R.K and Naik, K.S.S.(2012). Variability and genetic association studies of yield, physiological and confectionery traits in 28 F2 crosses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Research ANGRAU. 40(2): 107-111.

  10. Sadasivam, S and Manickam, A.(1992). Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited. New Delhi. 10-11.

  11. Shoba, D., Manivannan, N and Vindhiyavarman, P.(2009). Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1: 74-77. 

  12. Sudhir K.I., Venkataravana, P and Gururaja, M.R.(2008). Evaluation of new germplasm and advanced breeding lines of groundnut under late kharif situation. Legume Research. 31(4): 254-258.

  13. Thirumala, R.V., Bhanu, D., Murthy, K.G.K and Bharathi D.(2012). Genetic variability and association among the various characters in groundnut. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 3(3): 337- 341. 

  14. Zaman, M.A., Tuhina, K.M., Ullah, M.Z., Moniruzzam, M and Alam, K.H.(2011). Genetic variability and path analysis of groundnut. The Agriculturist. 9(1): 29-36 

Editorial Board

View all (0)