Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 40 issue 5 (october 2017) : 824-829

Studies on genetic variability, character association and path analysis for yield and its contributing traits in chickpea [Cicer arietinum (L.)]

D.K. Chopdar, Baudh Bharti, P.P. Sharma, R.B. Dubey, Brajendra, B.L. Meena
1<p>Department of Plant Breeding &amp; Genetics, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur-313001 (Rajasthan), India&nbsp;</p>
Cite article:- Chopdar D.K., Bharti Baudh, Sharma P.P., Dubey R.B., Brajendra, Meena B.L. (2017). Studies on genetic variability, character association and path analysis for yield and its contributing traits in chickpea [Cicer arietinum (L.)] . Legume Research. 40(5): 824-829. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.8395.

ABSTRACT

Genetic parameters, variability, heritability and genetic advance were studied among 20 genotypes of chickpea during during Rabi 2012-13. The characters, seed yield per plant and 100-seed weight had high values of GCV, heritability and GAM and  were found to be under greater control of additive gene action. While the traits, primary branches per plant, number of seeds per pod and protein content with moderate to low heritability coupled with low genetic advance appear to be more affected by on non-additive gene action. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for seed yield per plant and its components indicated that out of 11 characters, seed yield per plant showed significant and positive correlation with harvest index, number of seeds per pod, primary branches per plant, number of pods per plant, biomass per plant, and 100-seed weight indicating that an intense selection for these characters will improve seed yield in chickpea. Path coefficient analysis revealed that days to maturity, primary branches per plant, biomass per plant, harvest index, protein content and number of seeds per pod were major characters influencing seed yield directly and indirectly. The results indicated that number of seeds per pod should be given greater emphasis for manipulation of seed yield in chickpea.

REFERENCES


  1. Al-Jibouri, H. A., Millar, P. A. and Robinson, H. F. (1958). Genotype and environmental origin. Agronomy Journal, 50: 633-637.

  2. Allard, R.W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., USA Wiley International Edition. Pp:85.

  3. Arshad, M., A. Bakhsh, M. Bashir and M. Haqqani. (2002). Determining the heritability and relationship between yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pak. J. Bot., 34: 237-245.

  4. Bhavani, A. P. Sasidharan, N. Shukla, Y. M. and Bhatt, M. M. (2008). Correlation studies and path analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Research on Crops, 9(3):657-660.

  5. Borate, V. V. and Dalvi, V. V. (2010). Correlation and path analysis in chickpea. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 35(1):43-46. 

  6. Burton, G.W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grass. Proceedings of sixth international grassland congress, 1: 227-283.

  7. Dewey, D.R and Lu, K.H. (1959). A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal. 51: 515-518.

  8. Fisher, R. A. (1954). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 12th Eddn., Biological Monograph and Manuals. 5:130-131.

  9. Gaur, R. S., Tiwari, A. and Mishra, S. P. (2014). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for seed yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Trends in Biosciences, 7(1):54-57.

  10. Jivani, J. V., Mehta, D. R., Vaddoria, M. A. and Raval, L. (2013). Correlation and path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 4(2):1167-1170.

  11. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 413-418.

  12. Khan, R., Farhatullah and Khan, H. (2011). Dissection of genetic variability and heritability estimates of chickpea germplasm for various morphological markers and quantitative traits. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 27 (1): 67-72.

  13. Kjeldahl, J. (1883). “A new method for the estimation of nitrogen in organic compounds”.Z. anal.Chem., 22: 366.

  14. Kumar, R., Kuldeep, Pandey, S., Babbar, A. and Mishra, D. K. (2014). Genetic variability, character association and path coefficient analysis in chickpea grown under heat stress conditions. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 5 (4):812-819.

  15. Lush, J. L. (1940). Inter-sire correlation and regression of offspring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proc.Amer.Soc. Animal Production 33: 293-301.

  16. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. (1989). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi, pp. 157-165.

  17. Rao, C.M., Rao, Y.K. and Reddy, M. (2006). Genetic variability and path analysis in mungbean. Legume Res., 29: 216-218.

  18. Saxena, A. K., Sharma, S., Sandhu, J. S., Gupta, S. K. and Kaur. J. (2013). Variability and correlation studies for nutritional and cooking quality traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Indian J. Genet., 73(1): 51-56.

  19. Singh, A. and Sandhu, J. S. (2008). Correlation and path analysis in chickpea under different environments. Journal of Food Legumes, 21(2):145-148.

  20. Singh, R. K. and Chaudhary, B. D. (1977). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi pp: 252.

  21. Usman, S., Qurban, A., Naveed, M. T. and Saleem, M. (2012). Correlation analysis of seed yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. International Journal for Agro Veterinary and Medical Sciences, 6(4):269-276. 

  22. Vaghela, M.D., Poshiya, V.K., Savaliya, J.J., Kavani, R.H. and Davada, B.K. 2009. Genetic variability studies in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research, 32 (3): 191-194.

  23. Vekariya, D. H., Pithia, M. S. and Kalawadia, R. L. (2008). Correlation and path analysis in F2 generation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Research on Crops, 9(2):371-374.

  24. Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J. of Agric. Res. 20: 557-585.

  25. Yadav, P., Tripathi, D.K., Khan, K.K. and Yadav, A.K. (2015). Determination of genetic variation and heritability estimates for morphological and yield traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under late sown conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85 (7): 877–882.

  26. Yadav, S., Yadav, A. K. and Yadav, R. K. (2014). Characters association and path analysis studies for seed yield and its components in chickpea. Biochemical and Cellular Archives, 14(1):141-144.

  27. Yucel, D. O. and Anlarsal, A. E. (2010). Determination of selection criteria with path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) breeding. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(1):42-48.

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)