Interactions of shading conditions and irrigation regimes on photosynthetic traits and seed yield of soybean (Glycine max L.)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-359    | Article Id: LR-359 | Page : 230-238
Citation :- Interactions of shading conditions and irrigation regimes on photosynthetic traits and seed yield of soybean (Glycine max L.).Legume Research-An International Journal.2018.(41):230-238
M. Gholamhoseini, E. Ebrahimian, F. Habibzadeh, R. Ataei and M. S. Dezfulizadeh mgholamhoseini@spii.ir
Address : Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Submitted Date : 30-03-2017
Accepted Date : 25-07-2017

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 with eight treatments consisting of combination of four shading periods (shading during vegetative phase (V), reproductive phase (R), whole growing season and a control treatment) and two irrigation regimes (irrigation after depleting 40 and 80 % of available water). Under limited irrigation conditions, the highest PSII quantum yield, the capacity of electrons move beyond QA and electron move from intersystem to PSI acceptor side reduced, with greater decline degree in sunlight treatment. The minimum seed yield was recorded by plants treated with limited irrigation and whole growing season shade. Changes in the state of the photosynthetic electron transport chain and photorespiration rates in response to different shading treatments were primarily related to leaf water loss. In general, the results revealed that shading caused some shade avoidance responses in soybean, which finally reduced seed production.

Keywords

Growth Photosynthesis Shading Soybean Water deficit stress.

References

  1. Adams, W. W., Muller, O., Cohu, C. M., Demmig-Adams, B. (2013). May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity? Photosynthesis Research, 117: 31-44. 
  2. Baldi, P., Muthuchelian, K., La Porta, N. (2012). Leaf plasticity to light intensity in Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.): adaptability of a Mediterranean conifer cultivated in the Alps. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 117: 61-69. 
  3. Bota, J., Medrano, H., Flexas, J. (2004). Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytologist, 162: 671-681. 
  4. Corpas, F. J., Barroso, J. B., del Rýìo, L. A. (2001). Peroxisomes as a source of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide signal molecules in plant cells. Trends in Plant Science, 6: 145-150. 
  5. Hodgson, J., Montserrat-Martí, G., Charles, M., Jones, G., Wilson, P., Shipley, B., Sharafi, M., Cerabolini, B., et al. (2011). Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area? Annals of Botany, 108 : 1337-1345. 
  6. Kruse, O. (2001). Light-induced short-term adaptation mechanisms under redox control in the PS II-LHCII supercomplex: LHC II state transitions and PS II repair cycle. Naturwissenschaften, 88: 284-292. 
  7. Li, P., Ma, F. (2012). Different effects of light irradiation on the photosynthetic electron transport chain during apple tree leaf dehydration. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 55: 16-22. 
  8. Mullineaux, C. W., Emlyn-Jones, D. (2005). State transitions: an example of acclimation to low-light stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56: 389-393. 
  9. Naramoto, M., Katahata, S.-i., Mukai, Y., Kakubari, Y. (2006). Photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition on exposure to high light in shade-developed leaves of Fagus crenata seedlings. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 201: 120-126. 
  10. Ohashi, Y., Nakayama, N., Saneoka, H., Mohapatra, P. K., Fujita, K. (2009). Differences in the responses of stem diameter and pod thickness to drought stress during the grain filling stage in soybean plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 31: 271-277. 
  11. Ping, M., Bai, T.-h., Wang, X.-q. (2015). Effects of light intensity on photosynthesis and photoprotective mechanisms in apple under progressive drought. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14: 1755-1766. 
  12. Rakiæ, T., Gajiæ, G., Lazareviæ, M., Stevanoviæ, B. (2015). Effects of different light intensities, CO2 concentrations, temperatures and drought stress on photosynthetic activity in two paleoendemic resurrection plant species Ramonda serbica and R. nathaliae. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 109: 63-72. 
  13. Silva, M. D. A., Jifon, J. L., Santos, C. M. D., Jadoski, C. J., Silva, J. A. G. D. (2013). Photosynthetic capacity and water use efficiency in sugarcane genotypes subject to water deficit during early growth phase. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 56: 735-748. 
  14. Strasser, R. J., Tsimilli-Michael, M., Qiang, S., Goltsev, V. (2010). Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Bioenergetics, 1797: 1313-1326. 
  15. Sultan, S. E. (2000). Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends in Plant Science, 5: 537-542. 
  16. Suorsa, M., Aro, E.-M. (2007). Expression, assembly and auxiliary functions of photosystem II oxygen-evolving proteins in higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 93: 89-100. 
  17. Wang, L., Deng, F., Ren, W.-J. (2015). Shading tolerance in rice is related to better light harvesting and use efficiency and grain filling rate during grain filling period. Field Crops Research, 180: 54-62. 
  18. Yamazaki, J., Kamata, K., Maruta, E. (2011). Seasonal changes in the excess energy dissipation from Photosystem II antennae in overwintering evergreen broad-leaved trees Quercus myrsinaefolia and Machilus thunbergii. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 104: 348-356. 
  19. Zhao, D., Hao, Z., Tao, J. (2012). Effects of shade on plant growth and flower quality in the herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 61: 187-196. 

Global Footprints