Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 40 issue 1 (february 2017) : 22-26

Genetic base of Indian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties revealed by pedigree analysis

A.K. Srivastava*, S.K. Chaturvedi, N.P. Singh
1<p>ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research,&nbsp;Kanpur-208 024, India.</p>
Cite article:- Srivastava* A.K., Chaturvedi S.K., Singh N.P. (2016). Genetic base of Indian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varietiesrevealed by pedigree analysis . Legume Research. 40(1): 22-26. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.3550.

In the present study an attempt has been made to determine the genetic base of 138 Indian chickpea varieties through pedigree analysis. The genetic base of 138 varieties can be traced to 160 ancestors utilised to bring genes in development of varieties.  Among these, 118 ancestors were used only once or twice. The most frequently used parent included Rabat (37), Pb 7 (36), IP 58 (32), C 1234 (32) and S 26 (27). Rabat and Pb7 are present in the pedigree of more than 26% of varieties followed by C 1234 (23.29%), IP 58 (23.29%) and S 26 (19.57%). Most of the frequently used parents have been used indirectly in the crossing programme. Only 28 parents could represent 50% of total genetic base of chickpea varieties developed in the country. Although conscious efforts have been made to include diverse parents in the chickpea breeding leading to broad genetic base of the varieties yet a huge arsenal of germplasm lines remains unutilised or not resulted in varieties. There is a need to utilise the germplasm resources as well as modern techniques of breeding to incorporate multiple biotic and abiotic stress resistance for yield improvement and stabilization as well as improvement in market driven traits like extra-large seed sized kabuli lines. The present article describes the results of pedigree analyses to determine the genetic base of the released cultivars, reasons for narrow genetic base and possible approaches and strategies for its widening in chickpea.


  1. Ahmad, F. and Slinkard, A.E. (1992). Genetic relationships in the genus Cicer L as revealed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of seed storage proteins. Theor. Appl. Genet., 84: 688-692.

  2. Anonymous. (2015). Commodity profile of pulses – March 2015. Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.

  3. Argikar, G.P. (1970). Pulse crops of India. In Gram (Ed P. Kachroo), Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India. pp 54-135.

  4. Arora, P.P. (1991). Genetic variability and its relevance in chickpea improvement. International Chickpea Newsletter,    25: 9-10.

  5. Bhat, S. (2014). Impact of untimely rains and hailstorms on prices of chickpea. Pulses Newsletter, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, 25: 6.

  6. Chaturvedi, S.K. and Nadarajan, N. (2010). Genetic enhancement for grain yield in chickpea – accomplishments and resetting research agenda. Electron J. Plant Breeding,1: 611-615.

  7. Cox, T.S., Murpy, J.P. and Rodgers, D.M. (1986). Changes in genetic diversity in the red winter wheat regions of the United Sates. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 5583-6. 

  8. DAC. (2015). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance – 2014. Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.

  9. Dixit, G.P. and Katiyar, P.K. (2005). Genetic base of lentil varieties and breeding lines developed in India. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 77: 585-589.

  10. Gaur, P.M., Jukanti, A.K., Samineni, S., Chaturvedi, S.K., Basu, P.S., Babbar, A., Jayalakshmi, V., Nayyar, H., Devasirvatham, V., Mallikarjuna, N., Krishnamurthy, L. and Gowda, C.L.L. (2014). Climate Change and Heat Stress Tolerance in Chickpea. In: Climate Change and Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance, Vol. 2 (Tuteja, N. and Gill, S.S. Eds.). Wiley-    VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, pp 839-855. 

  11. Gautam, P.L., Sharma, G.D., Srivastava, U., Singh, B.B., Kumar, A., Saxena, R.K. and Srinivasan, K. (2000). 20 glorious years of NBPGR (1976-1996). National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.

  12. Gopal, J. and Oyama, K. (2005). Genetic base of Indian potato selections as revealed by pedigree analysis. Euphytica,    142: 23–31.

  13. ICAR. (2015). http://www.icar.org.in/files/Contingency-Unseasonal-Rainfall-2015.pdf.

  14. Katiyar, P.K., Dixit, G.P. and Singh, B.B. (2008). Genetic base of advanced urdbean breeding lines developed in India as revealed by pedigree analysis. Indian J. Genet., 68: 324-326.

  15. Kazan, K., Muehlbauer, F.J. (1991). Allozyme variation and phylogeny in annual species of Cicer (Leguminosae). Plant Syst. Evol.,175: 11-21.

  16. Knauft, D.A. and Gorbet, D.W. (1989). Genetic diversity among peanut cultivars. Crop Sci., 29: 1417-1422.

  17. Kumar, S., Gupta, S., Chandra, S. and Singh, B.B. (2004).How wide is the genetic base of pulse crops? In: Pulses in New Perspective. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Crop Diversification and Natural Resources Management, 20– 22 December 2003. Kanpur: Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of Pulses Research (Eds. Masood Ali et al.) pp. 211–221.

  18. Ladizinsky, G. and Adler, A. (1975). The origin of chickpea as indicated by seed proyein electrophoresis. Israel Journal of Botany,24: 183-189.

  19. Lin, M.S. and Lin, S.F. (1994). Pedigree analysis of soybean varieties. Botanical Bulletin Academy,35: 87-93.

  20. Lin, M.S.Z. (1991). Genetic base of japonica rice varieties released in Taiwan. Euphytica, 56: 43-46.

  21. Project Coordinator Report (2015). All India Coordinated Research Project on Chickpea. pp 36-52.

  22. (http://www.aicrpchickpea.res.in/project_coordinators_report.htm)

  23. Siddique, K.H.M., Brindsmead, R.B., Knight, R., Knights, E.J., Paull, J.G. and Rose, I.A. (2000). Adaptation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) and faba bean (Vicia faba L) to Australia. In: Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for pulses in the 21st century. (R Knight ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, the Netherlands pp. 289-303.

  24. Singh, N.P., Sevak, S., Iquebal, M.A., Chaturvedi, S.K. and Nath, Omkar. (2009). Improved varieties of chickpea in India. Technical Bulletin, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur.

  25. Tayyar, R.I. and Wainws, J.G. (1996). Genetic relationships among natural species of Cicer (Fabaceae) using isozyme variation. Theor. Appl. Genet., 92: 245-254.

  26. Upadhyaya, H.D., Furman, B.J., Dwivedi, S.L., Udupa, S.M., Gowda, C.L.L., Baum, M., Crouch, J.H., Buhariwalla, H.K. and Singh, S. (2006). Development of a composite collection for mining germplasm possessing allelic variation for beneficial traits in chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4: 13–19. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)