Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 39 issue 3 (june 2016) : 355-358

Genetic relationship between yield and battering quality in blackgram (Vigna Mungo L.)

K. Veni*, E.Murugan, M.L.Mini, C. Vanniarajan, T. Radhamani
1<p>Agricultural College and Research Institute,&nbsp;Madurai-625 104, India.</p>
Cite article:- Veni* K., E.Murugan, M.L.Mini, Vanniarajan C., Radhamani T. (2015). Genetic relationship between yield and battering quality inblackgram (Vigna Mungo L.) . Legume Research. 39(3): 355-358. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.8407.

An experiment was carried out to study the genetic divergence of 39 genotypes of blackgram. Biochemical parameters such crude protein, albumin and globulin content and yield attributing traits such as hundred seed weight and single plant yield were estimated. Grouping of genotypes into various clusters was done by Mahalnobis D2 statistics. The 39 genotypes were grouped into five clusters. Among the five clusters, cluster V had more number of genotypes. The highest value of intra cluster distance was recorded in cluster V while cluster I had minimum intra cluster distance and maximum inter cluster distance was observed between cluster II and cluster III. Among the nine characters single plant yield and hundred seed weight contributed maximum towards divergence. The study showed that the genotypes UH04-4, CO 5, KKB05011 and ACM07002 could be used for hybridization to develop high yielding blackgram varieties with good battering quality.


  1. Chauhan M.P., Mishra, and Ashok Kumar Singh, (2008). Genetic Divergence Studies in Urd bean (Vigna mungo L.). Legume Res., 31: 63 -67.

  2. Dikshit, U.N., and Swain, D. (2000). Genetic divergence and heterosis in sesame. Indian J. of Genetics, 60:213-219

  3. Ghafoor, A., Sharifb, Ahmada, Z., Zahidc, M.A. and Rabbani, M.A. (2001). Genetic diversity in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Field Crops Res., 69: 183-190.

  4. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Roseburgh, A.L farr, and R.J Randall, (1951). J. of biological chemistry., 193, p-265.

  5. Landry, J and Moureaux, T. (1970). Heterogenicity of the glutelins of the grain core. Selective extraction and composition in amino acids of the three isolated fractions. Bull. Soc. Chem. Biol. 52:1021–1037.

  6. Manivannan, N., Murugan, E. Viswanathan. P, Sethuraman, K. and Dhanakodi, C.V. (1999). Genetic divergence in Urdbean (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Indian J. Pulses Res., 12: 25-29.

  7. Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research, John Wiley and sons, Inc. New York.

  8. Srivastava Priya, Pandey Anjana and Sinha Diamond Prakash, (2011). Genetic diversity analysis in different varieties of black gram using RAPD markers. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 3: 53-59.

  9. Umadevi, M., Meenakshi Ganesan, N and Muthiah, AR. (2008). Batter quality –Need for Traditional Indian Fermented Urdbean – Rice Food. Madras Agric.J., 95 : 440-447.

  10. Umadevi, M and N. Meenakshi Ganesan (2007). D2 analysis for yield and quality characters in Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)., Legume Res., 30 :197 – 200.

  11. Verma, S. and Katna, G. (1997). Divergence analysis in blackgram over cropping systems. Crop Improv., 24: 97-100.

Editorial Board

View all (0)