Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 39 issue 5 (october 2016) : 774-779

Evaluation of CropSyst model for clusterbean under hot arid condition

Ramesh Kumar*, R.S. Yadav, N.D. Yadava2, Amit Kumawat2, Vinay Nangia1, M. Glazirina1, V.S. Rathore2, M.L. Soni2, Birbal2
1<p>College of Agriculture,&nbsp;Bikaner - 334 006, India.</p>
Cite article:- Kumar* Ramesh, Yadav R.S., Yadava2 N.D., Kumawat2 Amit, Nangia1 Vinay, Glazirina1 M., Rathore2 V.S., Soni2 M.L., Birbal2 (2016). Evaluation of CropSyst model for clusterbean under hot arid condition . Legume Research. 39(5): 774-779. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.3551.

The study on “Evaluation of Cropsyst model for yield and water productivity of clusterbean” was conducted on farmers field during kharif 2012 at village Mainawali in Hanumangarh district of Rajasthan. The soils of the area are alluvial and calcareous in nature formed under arid and semi arid climate. The soils of site are brown to greyish brown and dark grey in colour, besides being calcareous and slightly alkaline in reaction having 67.7, 11.1 and 21.0 % of sand, clay and silt, respectively in 0-15 cm soil depth with pH 8.09 and low soil organic matter content. The simulate yield of clusterbean were closer to the observed clusterbean yield. Simulations of early clusterbean above ground biomass development matched the field data reasonably well. Final above ground biomass, however, was over estimated by the model. The total water applied in clusterbean was 405.8 mm out of this 326.7 mm consumed in ET. Thus, ET constituted 81% of total water applied and deep drainage constituted 13% and rest 6% stored as residual soil moisture.

  1. Arora, V.K., Singh, C. and Singh, K. (1997). Comparative assessment of soil water balance under wheat in a sub-tropical environment with simplified models. J. Agri. Sci., 128: 461-468. 

  2. Aujla, M.S., Singh, C.J., Vashist, K.K. and Sandhu, B.S. (1991). Evaluation of methods for irrigation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutam) in a canal irrigated area of south west Punjab, India. Arid Soil Research, 5:225-234.

  3. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H. (1986). Bulk Density. In [Klute A. (ed.)] Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 - Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI. 

  4. Bouyoucos, H.J. (1962). A hydrometer method for the determination of textural class of soils. Tech. Bult. 132, Michigan state coll. Agr. Exp. Sta. pp.1-38. 

  5. Harper, H.J. (1924).The accurate determination of nitrates in soils. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16: 180-183. 

  6. Hu, C., Saseendran, S.A., Green, T.R., Ma, L., Li, X. and Ahuja, L.R. (2006). Evaluating Nitrogen and Water Management in a Double-Cropping System Using RZWQM. Vadose Zone Journal, 5: 493-405.

  7. Jalota, S.K., Parihar, S.S. and Gajri, P.R. (1985). Drainage loss under different irrigation schedules and stage sensitivity of wheat to water stress. Indian Journal of agricultural Sciences, 55: 574-581. 

  8. Jalota, S.K., Sood, A., Chahal, G.B.S. and Choudhary B.U. (2006). Crop water productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) – wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system as influenced by deficit irrigation, soil texture and precipitation. Agricultural Water Management 84: 137–46.

  9. Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C. and Hsu, C.S. (2003). Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. In J. Local, R. Ogden & R. Temple (Eds.), Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI (pp.143-161). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

  10. McCrown, R.L., Hammer, G.L. and Hargreaves, J.N.G. (1996). APSIM: a novel software system for model development , model testing ,and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric syst., 100: 87-97.

  11. Peech, M., Alexander, L.T., Dean, L.A., Reed, J.F. (1947). Methods of Soil Analysis for Soil-Fertility Investigations. U.S. Department Agricultural Circular, 25: 757.

  12. Prince, A.L. (1945). Determination of total nitrogen, ammonia, nitrates, and nitrites in soils. Soil Science, 59: 47-52.

  13. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Hand book No.60. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. New Delhi. 

  14. Singh, R., Jhorar, R.K., van Dam, J.C. and Feddes, R.A. (2006). Distributed ecohydrological modelling to evaluate the performance of irrigation systems in Sirsa district. India II: impact of viable water management scenarios, Journal of Hydrology. 329: 714–723.

  15. Singh, R.P., Yesh, P. and Singh, H. (2011). Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under late sown condition. Pantnagar Journal of Research. 9: 308-310.

  16. Stockle C O and Nelson R. (1999). ClimGen, Manual. Biological Systems Engineering Department, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 28 pp.

  17. Stockle C O, Martin S A and Campbell G S. (1994). CropSyst a cropping system simulation model: Water/nitrogen budgets and crop yield. Agricultural Systems, 46: 335–59.

  18. Stockle, C.O., Ddonattelli, M. and Nelson, R. (2003). CropSyst, a cropping system simulation model. Europian Journal of Agronomy, 18:289-307.

  19. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). Rapid titration method for organic carbon of soils. Soil Science, 37: 29-32. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)