Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 39 issue 5 (october 2016) : 830-833

Effect of seed hydro-priming and urea spray on yield parameters, yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris medikus)

S.K. Das*, K. Jana1
1<p>AICRP on Potato, Directorate of Research, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,&nbsp;Kalyani- 741 235, Nadia, West Bengal, India.</p>
Cite article:- Das* S.K., Jana1 K. (2016). Effect of seed hydro-priming and urea spray on yield parameters,yield and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris medikus) . Legume Research. 39(5): 830-833. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9289.

Field experiments were conducted for three years at Pulses and Oilseeds Research Station, Berhampore, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India during rabi 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 to study the effects of seed hydro-priming and urea spray in lentil. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design with four replications having ten treatment combinations viz. two levels of seed priming as factor A and five levels of foliar spray of 2% urea solution as factor B. Experimental results revealed that growth, yield attributing characters, yield and seed protein content of lentil were significantly influenced by seed hydro-priming, urea spray and interaction effects of these two factors. Significantly higher seed yield was obtained under the water soaking treatment (1211 kg ha-1) as compared to no soaking (1169 kg ha-1).  Among the foliar spray treatments, two sprays at branching and pod initiation stages recorded the highest seed yield (1271 kg ha-1) of lentil cultivar WBL-58 followed by one spray at flower initiation stage (1236 kg ha-1) irrespective of seed priming.  Among the interaction effects, two sprays at branching and pod initiation along with water soaking recorded the highest seed yield (1295 kg ha-1) followed by one spray at flower initiation along with water soaking (1265 kg ha-1).  Seed hydro-priming and urea spray were found to increase the seed yield of lentil to the tune of 17.9 % and seed protein content by 19% over their non application.

  1. Ashour, N.I. and Thalooth, A.T. (1983). Effect of soil and foliar application of nitrogen during pod development on the yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) Field Crop Res., 6: 261-266.

  2. Attia, K.K and El-Dsouky, M.M. (2001). Effect of Farmyard manure application and late foliar nutrition with nitrogen during the pod filling stage on yield and some nutrients content in seeds of faba bean. Assiut J. Agric. Sci., 32: 277-291.

  3. El- Kramany, M. F. and Gobarah, M. E. (2005). Response of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to N- Slow release fertilizer and urea late foliar application in sandy soil. Egypt J. Agric. Res., 2: 197-207.

  4. El- Kramany, M.F., Magda, H. Mohamed and Nofal, O.A. (2003). Effect of late foliar application with urea and Potasium fertilization on yield, yield components and chemical composition of two mungbean varieties. Egypt J. Appl. Sci., 18: 177-188.

  5. Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Aliloo, A. A., Valizadeh, M. and Moghaddam, M. (2008a). Effects of different priming techniques on seed invigoration and seedling establishment of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). J. Food Agri. Environ., 6:222-226.

  6. Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Sheikhzadeh-Mosaddegh, P. and Valizadeh, M. (2008b). Effects of hydro-priming duration and limited irrigation on field performance of chickpea. Res. J. Seed Sci., 1:34-40.

  7. Hsu, C. C., Chen, C. L., Chen, J. J. and Sung, J. M. (2003). Accelerated aging-enhanced lipid peroxidation in bitter gourd seeds and effects of priming and hot water soaking treatments. Sci. Horti., 98:201-212.

  8. Khan, A. A. (1992). Preplant physiological seed conditioning, pp. 131–181. In: Janick J. (Eds.). Horticultural Reviews. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

  9. Lin, J. M. and Sung, J. M. (2001). Pre-sowing treatments for improving emergence of bitter gourd seedlings under optimal and sub-optimal temperatures. Seed Sci. Technol., 29:39-50.

  10. McDonald, M. B. (1999). Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Sci. Technol., 27:177-237.

  11. McDonald, M.B. (2000). Seed priming, pp. 287-325. In: Black, M. and Bewley, J. D. (Eds.). Seed Technology and Its Biological Basis. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, England.

  12. Palta, J.A., Nandwal, A.S., Kumari, S. and    Turner, N.C. (2005). Foliar nitrogen applications increase the seed yield and protein content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) subject to terminal drought. Australian J. Agric. Res., 56: 105-112.

  13. Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W. (1985). Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 540 pp.

  14. Thornton, J. M. and Powell, A. A. (1992). Short-term aerated hydration for the improvement of seed quality in Brassica oleracea. Seed Sci. Res., 2:41-49

  15. Wang, H. Y., Chen, C. L. and Sung, J. M. (2003). Both warm water soaking and solid priming treatments enhance anti-    oxidation of bitter gourd seeds germinated at sub-optimal temperature. Seed Sci. Technol., 31:47-56.

  16. Zeidan, M.S. (2003). Effect of sowing dates and urea foliar application on growth and seed yield of determinate faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under Egyptian conditions. Egypt J. Agron., 24: 93-102.

Editorial Board

View all (0)