Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 41 issue 2 (april 2018) : 208-212,   Doi: 10.18805/LR-3421

Morphological variability and phylogenetic analysis in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

S
S.M. Razvi
M
M.N. Khan
M
M. Ashraf Bhat
M
Mushtaq Ahmad
S
S.A. Ganaie
F
F.A. Sheikh
S
S. Najeeb
F
F.A. Parry
1Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar -190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

  • Submitted27-01-2015|

  • Accepted20-05-2017|

  • First Online 15-02-2018|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-3421

Cite article:- Razvi S.M., Khan M.N., Bhat Ashraf M., Ahmad Mushtaq, Ganaie S.A., Sheikh F.A., Najeeb S., Parry F.A. (2018). Morphological variability and phylogenetic analysis in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research. 41(2): 208-212. doi: 10.18805/LR-3421.

ABSTRACT

Thirteen common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) accessions collected from different ecological regions of Jammu and Kashmir were evaluated at four diverse locations during kharief  2009. Significant variation was observed for most of the morphological traits.  Estimates of heritability (bs) were high (>60 %) for all the traits except pod length. The expected genetic gain (per cent of mean) was high (>30 %) for days to maturity, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, 100-seed weight and seed yield plant-1 while it was moderate (10.0-30.0%) for days to 50 per cent flowering, number of branches plant-1, pod length and protein content. Seed yield plant-1 was observed to have a highly positive and significant correlation both at phenotypic and genotypic levels with number of pods plant-1, pod length, number of seeds pod-1 and 100-seed weight. But negative and significant correlations with days to 50 per cent flowering and days to maturity were estimated from pooled analysis. Classification of accessions led to the formation of two clusters wherein the maximum number 7 accessions were grouped in cluster I and the remaining six were grouped in cluster II. Analysis of traits contributing maximum to the divergence revealed that traits viz., 100-seed weight (37.10%), protein content (15.26%), number of seeds pod-1 (11.28%) and days to maturity (10.14%) to contribute to the divergence in the present experimental material.

REFERENCES

  1. Barelli, M.A.A., Gonclaves-Vidigal, M.C., Vidigal Filho, P.S., Amaral Junior, Antonio, T.D. and Poletine, J.P. (2005). Characterization of landraces of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm from Mato Grosso do Sul State. Bean Improvement Cooperative 48 : 10-11.
  2. Beebe, S.E., Skroch, P.W., Tohme, J., Duque, M.C., Pedraza, F. and Nienhuis, J. (2000). Strucutre of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Science 40 : 264-273.
  3. Ceolin, A.C.G., Vidigal, M.C.G., Filho, P.S.V., Kvitschal, M.V., Gonela, A. and Scapim, C.A. (2007). Genetic divergence of the common bean (Phaseolusvlgaris L.) group carioca using morpho-agronomic traits by multivariate analysis. Hereditas144 : 1-9. 
  4. Chand, P. (1999). Character association and path analysis in rajmash. Madras Agriculture Journal 85 : 188-190.
  5. Ciombra, J.L.M., Guidolin, A.F. and Carvalho, F.D. (1998). Path coefficients, canonical correlations and genetic divergence : I.Among primary and secondary characters of seed yield in black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Pesq.-A grop-Gaucha 4:183-188. 
  6. Duarte, J.B., Dos Santos, J.B. and Melo, L.C. (1999). Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from different races based on RAPD markers. General Molecular Biology 22 : 419-426.
  7. Duran, L.A., Blair, M.W., Giraldo, M.C., Macchiavelli, R., Prophete, E., Nin, J.C. and Beaver, J.S. (2005). Morphological and molecular characterization of common bean landraces and cultivars from the Caribbean. Crop Science 45 : 1320-1328. 
  8. Dursun, A. (2007). Variability, heritability and correlation studies in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3: 12-16.
  9. Faleiro, F.G. and Janqueira N.T.V. (2010). Recursos geneticos: conservacao, caracterizacao e uso. Available at www.cpac.embrapa.br/    publico/usuarios/uploads/cursobiotec/capitulo5.pdf. 
  10. Freytag, G.F. and Debouck, D.G. (2002). Taxonomy, distribution and ecology of the genus phaseolus (Leguminosae-apilinoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. BRIT, Forth Worth. 
  11. Goncalves, M.C., Carrea, A.M., DersDestro, D., Souza, L.C.F. and Sobrinho, T.A. (2003). Correlations and path analysis of common bean grain yield and its primary components. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 3: 217-222. 
  12. Graham, P.H. and Vance, C.P. (2003). Legumes : Importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology 131 : 872-877.International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR) (1982). Descriptors for Phaseolus vulgaris. IBPRG Secretariat, Rome, Italy.
  13. Jones, M.A., Skrotch, P.W., Neinhuis, J., Hinrichsen, P., Bascur, G. And Munoz-Schick, C. (1997). Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data. Crop Science 37 : 605-613.
  14. Leliji, O.I., Dickson, M.H., Crow der, L.V. and Bourke, J.B. (1972). Inheritance of crude protein percentage and its correlation with seed yield in beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Crop Science 12 : 168-171
  15. Mirjana, V. (2005). Principal component analysis of dry bean collection. Bean Improvement Corporative 48 : 16-17.
  16. Raffi, S.A. and Nath, U.K. (2004). Variability, heritability, genetic advance and relationships of yield and yield contributing characters in dry bean (P. vulgaris L.). Journal of Biological Sciences 4 : 157-159.
  17. Salehi, M., Tajik, M. and Ebadi, A.G. (2008). The study of relationship between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with multivariate statistical methods. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 3 : 806-809. 
  18. Scully, B.T., Vallace, D.H. and Viands, D.R. (1991). Heritability and correlation of biomass, growth rates, harvest index and phenology to the yield of common beans. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 116 : 127-130. 
  19. Sharma, M.K., Mishra, S. and Rana, N.S. (2009). Genetic divergence in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) pole type cultivars. Legume Research 32 : 220-223. 
  20. Singh, S.P. (1989). Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic botany 43: 39-57.
  21. Singh, A.K., Singh, A.P., Singh, S.B. and Singh, V. (2009). Relationship and path analysis for green pod yield and its contributing characters over environments in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research 32: 270-273. 
  22. Singh, G., Singh, S.P. and Chawdhary, B.S. (1997). Genetic divergence analysis in ricebean. Indian Journal of Genetics 58 : 101-105.
  23. Singh, S.P. (2001). Broadening the genetic basis of common bean cultivars: A Review. Crop Science 41 : 1659-1675.
  24. Vasic, M., Varga, J and cervenski, J. (2008). Divergence in dry bean collection by principal component analysis. Genitika, 41: 23-30 
Published In
Legume Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)