Combining ability, heterotic grouping and patterning of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] lines for high seed yield

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9380    | Article Id: LR-3415 | Page : 682-689
Citation :- Combining ability, heterotic grouping and patterning of mungbean[Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] lines for high seed yield .Legume Research-An International Journal.2016.(39):682-689

Chandra Mohan Singh*1,2, Madhuri Arya, S.B. Mishra and Anil Pandey 

cmsingh.gpb@gmail.com
Address :

Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi - 848 125, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India.

Submitted Date : 13-01-2015
Accepted Date : 21-05-2015

Abstract

An investigation was done to study the combining ability, heterotic grouping and patterning of mungbean lines using diallel analysis. The parents viz DMS-03-17-2 (for days to maturity, primary branches per plant, secondary branches per plant, seeds per pod, seed index, harvest index, seed yield per plant); IPM-2K-14-9 (for plant height); Meha (for primary branches per plant, secondary branches per plant, average intermodal length, pod length, seeds per pod & seed yield per plant); DMS-01-34-2 (for secondary branches per plant & seed index) and SML 1151 (for seed index) were found best general combiners, whereas crosses namely IPM-2K-14-9/ DMS 03-17-2 (for plant height), SML 1151/ DMS 01-34-2 (seed index) and SML 1151/ Meha, IPM-2K-14-9/ Meha, IPM-2K-14-9/ DMS 03-17-2 & Meha/ DMS 01-34-2 (for seed yield/ plant) were top specific combiners and heterotic for respective traits. The pattern of heterotic grouping based on seed size and yield indicated that, heterosis was not only dependent upon the genetic distance between clusters; diversity within group was also showing remarkable heterosis.  

Keywords

Combining ability Heterosis Heterotic grouping Inheritance Mungbean Patterning.

References

  1. Ajamal, S.U., Zubair, J. and Anwar, M. (2007). Genetic implication of yield and its components in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Pak. J. Bot. 39: 1229-1236.
  2. Bertoria, L., Cesar, C. and Ruggero, B. (2006). Biplot analysis of forage combining ability in maize landraces. Crop Sci. 46: 1346-1353.
  3. Chakraborty, S., Borah, H. K., Borah, B.K., Pathak, D., Baruah, B.K., Kalita, H. and Barman, B. (2012). Genetic parameters and combining ability effects of parents for seed yield and other quantitative traits in blackgram. Not. Sci. Biol. 2: 121-126.
  4. Griffing, B. (1956). Concepts of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallele crossing system. Australiun J. Biol. Sci. 9: 465-493.
  5. Khan, M.S.S., Latif, A., Sajjad, T. and Latafat, P. (2005). Expression of heterosis in mungbean for yield and yield components in semi-arid region. Indus J. Plant Sci. 4: 530-534. 
  6. Khattak, G.S.S., Haq, M.A., Ashraf, M., Khan, A.J. and Zamir, R. (2001). Inheritance of some important agronomic traits in mungbean. Breeding Sci. 51: 157-161.
  7. Parentoni, S.N., Magalhaes, J.V., Pacheco, C.A.P., Santos, M.X., Abadie, T., Gama, E.E.G., Guimaraes, P.E.O., Meirelles, W.F., Lopes, M.A., Vasconcelos, M.J.V. (2001). Heterotic groups based on yield specific combining ability data and phylogenetic relationship determined by RAPD markers for 28 tropical maize open pollinated varieties. Euphytica. 121: 197–208.
  8. Patil, A.B., Desai, N.C. Mule, P.N. and Khandelwal, V. (2011). Combining ability for yield and component characters in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Res. 34: 190-195. 
  9. Rajendran, A., Muthiah, A., Joel, J., Shamungasundaram, P. and Raju, D. (2014). Heterotic grouping and Ptterning of quality protein maize inbreds based on genetic and molecular marker studies. Turkish J. Bio. 38: 10-20. 
  10. Rastogi, A., Mishra, B.K., Siddiqui, A., Srivastava, M. and Shukla, M. (2013). GEE biplot analysis based on diallel for exploitation of hybrid vigour in Oppium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 15: 151-162.
  11. Rehman, A.U., Ali, M.A., Atta, B.M., Saleem, M., Abbas, A. and Mallahi, A.R. (2009). Genetic studies of yield related traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Australian J. Crop Sci. 3: 352-360. 
  12. Selvam, A.Y. (2012). Diallel analysis in greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). International J. Recent Scientific Res. 3: 297-299.
  13. Shukla, S. and Singh, S.P. (2006). Genetic divergence in relation to heterosis in Opium poppy. J. Med. Arom. Plant Sci. 28: 4-8.
  14. Singh, C.M., Mishra, S.B. and Pandey, A. (2014 b). Pattern of agro-morphological trait relationship and genetic divergence in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 5: 97-106.
  15. Singh, C.M., Mishra, S.B., Pandey, A. and Arya, M. (2014 a). Morphological characterization and discriminant function analysis in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 5: 87-96.
  16. Sorajjapinun, W., Chankaew, S. and Srinive, P. (2012). Comparison of hybrid vigour based on parental distance in SSR markers and agronomic traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 34: 143-151.
  17. Ur-Rehman, A., Ali, M.A., Saleem, M. and Tadesse, W. (2010). Study of heritable variation and genetics of earliness in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Euphytica. 176: 331-339. 
  18. Yadav, H.K., Shukla, S. and Singh, S.P. (2007). Genetic divergence in parental genotypes and its relation with heterosis, F1 performance and general combining ability in Opium copy. Euphytica. 157: 123-130.
     

Global Footprints