Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in cowpea [vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.] using six parameter genetic model 

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.10285    | Article Id: LR-3393 | Page : 502-509
Citation :- Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in cowpea [vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.] using six parameter genetic model .Legume Research.2016.(39):502-509

Anand Singh, Y.V. Singh, Asheesh Sharma, Amit Visen1, Mithilesh Kumar Singh2 and Surendra Singh*

Address :

Department of Vegetable Science, College of Agriculture, G.B.P.U.A & T, Pantnagar-263 145, India

Submitted Date : 17-12-2014
Accepted Date : 27-08-2015


Generation Mean Analysis was carried out using six basic generations in 3 different crosses of cowpea to determine suitable breeding methods.  For most of the studied traits, additive, dominance, additive x additive, additive x dominance and dominance x dominance effects were significant.  Additive effect significantly contributed for days to 1st flowering and seed yield per plant.  Dominance effect was significant for the incidence of cowpea mosaic virus in family 1, while for pod maturity in family 2.  Additive x dominance type of interaction contributed significantly for days to 1st flowering, days to pod maturity and seed yield per hectare.  Duplicate type of epistasis was observed for days to 1st flowering and incidence of cowpea mosaic virus in family 1, number of pods per plant and pod length in family 2 and 3.  The findings suggested that pureline, pedigree and recurrent selection could be followed in cowpea improvement.


Additive Dominance Epistasis Generation mean analysis.


  1. Bhadru, D. and Navale, P.A. (2012). Genetic variability parameters in F2 and F3 populations of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Legume Res., 35: 75 – 77.
  2. Conceicao-Lopes, F.C.D., Gomes, R.L.F and Filho, F.R.F. (2003). Genetic control of cowpea seed sizes. Print version ISSN-    0103-9016.
  3. Hayman, B.I. (1958). The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity,12: 371-390.
  4. Hayman, B.I. and Mather, K. (1955). The description of gene interaction in continuous variation. Biomet., 11: 63-82.
  5. Jatasara. (1980). Combining ability for grain weight in cowpea. Indian J. of Genet., 40: 330-333.
  6. Khadr, F.H. and Frey, K.J. (1965). Effectiveness of recurrent selection in oat breeding (Avena sativa L.). Crop Sci., 5: 349-354.
  7. Mather, K. 1949. Biometerical Genetics 1st ed. Methuen, London.
  8. Mote, M.S., Bendale, V.W., Bhave, S.G. and Swant, S.S. (2007). Biomass partitioning studies in cowpea. J. Arid Leg., 5:105-109.
  9. Patil, R.B. and Bhapkar, B.G. (1986). Combining ability in cowpea, J. of Maharashta Agri. Uni., 11: 303-306.
  10. Rashwan, A. M. A. (2010). Estimation of some genetic parameters using six populations of two cowpea hybrids. Asian J. of Crop Sci., 2: 261.
  11. Singh, B. D. (1983). Plant Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. pp.183-198.
  12. Singh, B.B., Fery, R.L., (1997). Cowpea genetics: a review of the recent literature. In: Singh, B.B., Mohan Raj, D.R., Dashiell, K.E., Jackai, L.E.N. (Eds.), Advances in Cowpea Research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 30–49.
  13. Subbiah. V., Singh, G.K. and Naik, M.L. (2013). Gene action governing the inheritance of pod yield in cowpea. Legume Res., 27: 66-69.
  14. Umaharan, P., Ariyanayagam, R.P. and Haque, S.Q. (1997). Identification of resistance to cowpea severe mosaic virus (Trinidad isolate) in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Trop Agric., 74: 324–328.
  15. Uperati, M. (2011). Estimation of gene effects, heterosis and inbreeding depression for yield contributing traits in different cowpea crosses. M.Sc. Thesis, G.B. P.U.A & T, Pantnagar.

Global Footprints