Growth and developmental responses of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on various pulses

DOI: 10.18805/lr.v39i5.3774    | Article Id: LR-3347 | Page : 840-843
Citation :- Growth and developmental responses of Callosobruchusmaculatus (F.) on various pulses .Legume Research-An International Journal.2016.(39):840-843

Rupesh Sharma*, Renu Devi, Anil Soni, Umesh Sharma, Sunita Yadav, Ramesh Sharma and Ashok Kumar
 

rupesh.attrey@gmail.com
Address :

Department of Agriculture, OPJS University, Churu- 331 001, India.

Submitted Date : 5-05-2014
Accepted Date : 6-10-2016

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted on the developmental biology of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on five different pulses viz., black gram, green gram, chickpea (Desi), cowpea and pea. Significantly highest numbers of eggs, shortest post-oviposition, adult longevity and total life periods was recorded on cowpea. The beetle laid maximum eggs (89.3) on cowpea and minimum on pea (50.7). Maximum eggs were laid on first day of oviposition and lasted for eight days. Hatching of eggs was maximum on green gram (98.1%) and minimum on cowpea (94.3%). The oviposition period, post-oviposition period, incubation period, larval-pupal period, total life period and adult longevity were in the range of 6.6 to 7.9, 1.09 to 2.6, 4.3 to 5.1, 20.1 to 37.2, 31.6 to 39.1 and 11.0 to 13.1 days, respectively on various pulses. No significant differences were found in oviposition period, post-oviposition period, incubation period, total life period and adult longevity on various pulses. The adult emergence was maximum on chickpea (96.7%) and minimum on pea (52.3%). 

Keywords

Callosobruchus maculatus Growth Pulses.

References

  1. Bhalla, S.; Gupta, K.; Lal, B.; Kapur. M.L. and Khetarpal, R.K. (2008). Efficacy of various non-chemical methods against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. In: Endure International Conference, Diversify crop protection, October 12-15, 2008, La Grande- Motte, France. O. 41:1-4.
  2. CABI (2007). Crop Protection Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  3. Chakraborty, S.N. ; Chaudhuri, N. and Senapati, S.K. (2004). Correlation between seed parameters and relative susceptibility of mung bean genotypes to Callosobruchus chinensis during storage. . Ann. Pl. Protect. Sci., 12: 48 -50.
  4. Chandra, B. and Ghosh, A.B. (2006). Development of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on whole and decorticated grains of various pulses. Environ. Ecol., 24S (special 2): 358-362.
  5. Chandrakantha, J. and Mathavans, S. (1986). Change in in developmental rates and biomass energy in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchdae) reared on different foods and temperatures. J. Stored Products Res., 39: 355-365.
  6. Creadland, P.F. (1987). Effect of host change in the fecundity and development of an unusual strain of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchdae). J. Stored Products Res., 25: 91-98.
  7. Dhepe, V.S.; Wadnerkar, D.W.; Lawand, B.T. and Zanwar, P.R. (1993). Biology of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on different pulses. Bull. Grain Tech., 31: 22-24.
  8. El-Halfawy, M.A.; Nakhla, J.M.; Isa, N.H. and Halfaway, M.A. El. (1972). Effect of food on the fecundity, longevity and development of the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. Agri. Res. Review, 50: 67-70.
     

Global Footprints