Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 39 issue 2 (april 2016) : 310-314

Fecundity and preferential oviposition by pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus F on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) var dollar

Anamika Kar*, Jayalaxmi Ganguli
1<p>Department of Entomology, Indira Gandhi Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Raipur- 492 012, India</p>
Cite article:- Kar* Anamika, Ganguli Jayalaxmi (NaN). Fecundity and preferential oviposition by pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus F on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) var dollar . Legume Research. 39(2): 310-314. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.6770.

In a laboratory experiment female Callosobruchus maculatus distributed eggs on healthy chickpea seeds in a manner that maximizes the amount of resources allocated to each offspring under favourable condition. The female preferred seeds having more quantity of resources to meet the nutrition of her offspring, seeds having healthy seed coat over damaged ones, fresh seeds over infested seeds for laying higher number of eggs under normal day light condition over the total dark. This was more so in presence of multiple copulating males over single one. Host deprivation did not have any influence on fecundity.


  1. Ajayi, F.A. and Lale, N.S.F., (2001) Seed coat texture, host species and time of application affect the efficacy of essential oils applied for the control of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored pulses. Int. J. Pest Manage., 47: 161-166.

  2. Chandra, B. and Ghosh, A.B. (2006) Development of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on whole and decorticated grains of various pulses. Environ. Ecol., 24: 358-362.

  3. Eddy, P.E., Nilson, N. and Jacson, M. (2000) Copulating with multiple mates enhances female fecundity but not egg to adult survival in bruchids beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Evolution., 54(6) : 2161-2165.

  4. Caswell, G.H. (1981) Damage to stored cowpeas in northern state of Nigeria. Samaru J. Agri. Res., 1: 11-19

  5. Cope, J.W. and Fox, C.W. (2003) Oviposition decisions in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): effects of seed size on superparasitism. J. Stored Prod. Res., 39: 355-365.

  6. Jones, B.C. and Vamosi, S.M. (2010) Limited evidence for size based discrimination of oviposition sites in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). European J. Biol. Sci., 2 (1): 31-39.

  7. Kergoat, G.J., Silvain, J.F., Delobel, A., Tuda, M. and Anton, K.W. (2007) Defining the limits of taxonomic conservatism in host–plant use for phytophagous insects: Molecular systematics and evolution of host–plant associations in the seed-beetle genus Bruchus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 43: 251–269.

  8. Lal, D. and Raj, D.V. (2012) Mating, oviposition, fecundity and longevity of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) on different pigeon pea varieties. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 1(11): 12-15.

  9. Lin, J.Y., Yand, R.I. and Horny, S.B. (2004) Effect of host deprivation period on fecundity and longevity of seed beetles Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus. Pl. Prot. Bull., 46(3): 211-221.

  10. Messina, F.J. and Renwick, J.A.A. (1985a) Mechanism of egg recognition by cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus). Entomol. Expt. Appl., 37(3): 241-245.

  11. Messina, F.J. and Renwick, J.A.A. (1985b) Ability of ovipositing seed beetles to discriminate between seeds with differing egg loads. Ecol. Entomol., 10: 225-330.

  12. Mitchell, R. (1975) The evolution of oviposition tactics in the bean weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F). Ecology, 56: 696–702.

  13. Ofuya T.I. (1998) Response of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus F. to difference in seed size in a variety of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Nigerian J. Ent., 14: 31-43.

  14. Sarwar, M. (2012) Assessment of resistance to the attack of bean beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) in chickpea genotypes on the basis of various parameters during storage. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 34 (3): 287-291.

  15. Sharma, S.S. (1984) Review of literature on the losses caused by Callosobruchus chinensis (Bruchidae : Coleoptera) during storage of pulses. Bull. Grain Technol., 22(1): 62-71.

  16. Vamosi, S.M. (2005) Interactive effects of larval host and competition on adult fitness: an experimental test with seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol., 19: 859-864.

  17. Wasserman, S.S. (1985) Oviposition behaviour and its disruption in the southern cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 78(1) : 89-92. 

  18. Yang, R.L., Fushing, H. and Horng, S.B. (2006) Effects of search experience in a resource-heterogeneous environment on the oviposition decisions of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Ecol. Entomol., 31: 285-293.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)