Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 41 issue 1 (february 2018) : 135-142

Phenotypic and molecular determination of anthracnose disease resistance in Lake Van Basin’s bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Aytekin EKINCIALP, Suat SENSOY
1<p>Baskale Vocational School, Yuzuncu Yil University, 65080 Van, Turkey.</p>
Cite article:- EKINCIALP Aytekin, SENSOY Suat (2017). Phenotypic and molecular determination of anthracnose disease resistance in Lake Van Basin&rsquo;s bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) . Legume Research. 41(1): 135-142. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7858.

ABSTRACT

In this study, the resistance levels to anthracnose disease [Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. & Magnus) Lambs. Scrib.] of 92 bean genotypes collected from different parts of the Lake Van Basin were investigated by artificial inoculation and molecular markers. The resistance levels of bean genotypes to the isolate 11# of anthracnose disease were determined by classical inoculation method in a climate chamber condition, and the presence of resistance gene related markers in bean genotypes was determined by using four SCAR primers [SAS13 (950 bp, Co-42), SC08 (910 bp, Co-4), SF10 (1072 bp, Co-10), SZ04 (567 bp, Co-6)] and one RAPD [OA181500 (1500 bp, Co-15)] primer. In the artificial inoculation, the bean genotypes were evaluated according to the 0-9 scale, and the four of them having a value between 0 and 3 were found as resistant to this isolate of anthracnose, but the rest of them having a value between 4 and 9 were determined as sensitive. With molecular markers, it was found that the 82 bean genotypes had the resistant Co-42 allele; the 54 bean genotypes had the resistant Co-4 allele; the 6 bean genotypes had the resistant Co-10 allele; the 36 bean genotypes had the resistant Co-6 allele; and the 15 bean genotypes had the resistant Co-15 allele. The only bean genotype having all resistance markers was the genotype G81, whereas the bean genotypes G27, G28, G40, G76, and G86 had no resistance associated molecular markers.

REFERENCES


  1. Alzate-Marin, A.L., Menarim. H., Soares Baia, G., Paula Jr, T.J., Souza de, K.A., Costa da, M.R., Barros de, E.G., Moreira., M.A. (2001). Inheritance of anthracnose resistance in the common bean differential cultivar G 2333 and identification of a new molecular marker linked to the Co-42 gene. J. Phytopatology. 149: 59-264.

  2. Alzate-Marin, A.L., Costa, M.G.,. Arruda., K.M., Barros. E.G., and Moreira., M.A. (2003). Characterization of the anthracnose resistance gene present in Ouro Negro (Honduras 35) common bean cultivar. Euphytica. 133: 165-169.

  3. BIC 2009. SCAR markers linked with disease resistance traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. Updated: May, (2009). Bean Improvement Cooperative, Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., Lansing. http://    bic.css.msu .edu/ (accessed 11 Sept. 2011).

  4. Bigirimana, J., Rop. P.D., Fontaine, R. and Höfte, M.. (2000). Bean anthracnose: Infection methods and influence of plant stage on resistance. Proceedings, 52nd International Symposium on Crop Protection, Gent, Belgium, 9 May 2000. part II. Mededelingen Faculteit Lndbouwkundige en Toege Paste Biologische Wetenschhappen Universiteit Gent., 65-2b: 583-585.

  5. Bozbuga, R., Dasgan., H.Y., Akhoundnejad., Y., Imren., M., Toktay, H. and Kasapoglu, E.B. (2015). Identification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes having resistance against root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Legume Research-An International Journal, 38(5): 669-674.

  6. Dongfang, Y., Conner., R.L., Balasubramanian., P., Yu., K. , Park., J.S. , Penner., W.C., and Yager, L.M. (2007). Phenotypic and genotypic identification of anthracnose resistance in kidney bean cultivars grown in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 87 (2): 405-412.

  7. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle., J.L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem Bull. 19.11–15.

  8. Ernest, E.G. and Kelly., J.D. (2004). The Mesoamerican anthracnose resistance gene, Co-42, does not confer resistance in certain Andean genetic backgrounds. Annu Rpt Bean Improvement Coop. 47: 245-246.

  9. Erdinç, Ç., Türkmen, Ö., Demir, S., Sensoy, S.( 2017). “Determination of the anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (sacc. and magn.) lambs. scrib.) resistance in some turkish bean genotypes by artificial inoculation and molecular methods", journal of animal and plant sciences, vol.27, pp.175-185.

  10. Erdinç, Ç., Türkmen, Ö., Sensoy, S. (2013). Türkiye’nin bazi fasulye genotiplerinin çesitli bitkisel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 112-125.

  11. Ekincialp, A., Sensoy, S. (2013). “Van Gölü Havzasi fasulye genotiplerinin bazi bitkisel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi." Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 23.2 (2013): 102-111.

  12. Geffroy, V., Creusot., F., Falquet., J., Sevignac., M. , Adam-Blandon., A. A. F., Bannerot., H., Gepts., P. and Dron., M. (1998). A family of LRR sequences in the vicinity of the Co-2 locus for anthracnose resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris and its potential use in marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet. 96: 494-502.

  13. Geffroy, V., Sevignac., M., Billant., P., Dron., M. and Langin., T. (2008). Resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in Phaseolus vulgaris : a case study for mapping two independent genes. Theor Appl Genet. 116: 407-415.

  14. Gonçalves, A.M.O., Gonçalves Vidigal., M.C., Vidigal Filho., P.S., Poletine., J.P., Lacanallo., G.F. and Coimbra., G.K. (2010). Characterization of the anthracnose resistance gene in Andean common bean Corinthiano cultivar. Annu Rpt Bean Improvement Coop. 53: 220-221.

  15. Gonçalves Vidigal, M.C. and Kelly., J.D. (2006). Inheritance of anthracnose resistance in the common bean cultivar Widusa. Euphytica. 151: 411-419.

  16. Gonçalves Vidigal, M.C., Lacanallo. G.F. and Vidigal Filho. P.S. (2008). A new gene conferring resistance to anthracnose in andean common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar ‘Jalo Vermelho’. Plant Breeding. 127: 592-596.

  17. Gonçalves Vidigal, M.C., Bonett., L.P., Filho., P.S.V., Gonela. A. and Riberio., A.S. (2007). Genetic control on the performance of common bean differential cultivars to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum races. Brazilian archýves of biology and technology. 50 (4): 579-586.

  18. Gonçalves Vidigal, M.C.,. Vidigal Filho., P.S, Medeiros., A.F. and Pastor Corrales. M.A. (2009). Common bean landrace Jalo Listras Pretas is the source of a new Andean anthracnose resistance gene. Crop Science. 49: 133-138.

  19. Hou A., Balasubramanian., P.M. , Conner., R.L. ,. Yu., K and Navabi. A. (2010). Marker-asisted pyramiding of resistance to common bacterial blight and anthracnose in Navy bean. Annu Rpt Bean Improvement Coop. 53: 38-39.

  20. Madakbas, S.Y. and ª, Ellialtýoðlu,. (2005). Fasulye antraknozu (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) hastaligina dayanýklýlýðýn kalýtýmý. Alatarým. 4 (2): 1-12. (in Turkish)

  21. Madakbas, S.Y.,. Hýz., M.C, Gültekin., Y. and Sayar., M.T. (2009). STS/SCAR belirteçler kullanýlarak taze fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) hat ve çeºitlerinde antraknoza (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc&Magnus) Lambs. Scrib) dayanýklýlýk genlerinin tespiti üzerine araþtýrmalar. XVI. Biyoteknoloji Kongresi, 13-16 Aralýk 2009: Antalya. 162-166. (in Turkish)

  22. Madakbas, S.Y.,.Dolar., ª, Bayraktar., H. and Ellialtýoglu., ª (2006). Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde taze fasulye yetiºtirilen alanlarda görülen antraknoz hastalýðý etmenine (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc&Magnus) Lamba. Scrib) ait ýrklarýn tesbiti ve bazi fasulye çeºitlerinin hastalýða dayaným durumlarýnýn belirlenmesi üzerinde araºtirmalar. VI. Sebze Tarýmý Sempozyumu, 19-22 Eylül 2006, K.Maraº, 138. (in Turkish)

  23. Pereira, R., Ishikawa., F.H. , Pinto., J.M.A and Souza. E.A. (2010). Occurrence of anthracnose in common bean cultivars collected in the state of Minas Gerais-Brazil. Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 53: 224-225.

  24. Ragagnin, V.A., Souza., T.L.P.O, Sanglard., D.A., Arruda., K.M.A, Costa., M.R., Alzate Marin., A.L., Carneiro., J.E., Moreira., M.A., Barros., E.G. (2009). Development and agronomic performance of common bean lines simultaneously resistant to anthracnose, angular leaf spot and rust. Plant Breeding. 128: 156-163.

  25. Rio, L.E.D., Lamppa. R.S. and Gross. P.L. (2003). Characterization of the reaction of North Dakota dry bean cultivars to three races Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Plant Disease. 87: 263-265.

  26. Sao, M. K., Nair, S. K., Verulkar, S. B., Saxena, R. R., & Nanda, H. C. (2015). Molecular profiling and genetic diversity of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes using ISSR and SSR markers. Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research, 49(4), 373-376.

  27. Sofi, P.A. and Saba, I., (2016). Natural variation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for root traits and biomass partitioning under drought. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 50(6): 604-608.

  28. Vallejo, V. and Kelly, J.D. (2005). Initial dissection of the anthracnose resistance in the landrace cultivar G 2338. Annu. Rep. Bean Improv. Coop. 48: 76-77.

  29. Vidigal Filho, P.S., Gonçalves Vidigal., M.C., Kelly., J.D. and Kýrk., W.W. (2004). Sources of resistance to anthracnose in traditional common bean cultivars from Parana, Brazil. Annu Rpt Bean Improvement Coop. 47: 53-54.

  30. Yildiz, M., Ekbic., E., Keles., D, Sensoy., S. and Abak., K. (2011). Use of ISSR, SRAP, and RAPD markers to assess genetic diversity in Turkish melons. Scientia Horticulturae. 130: 349–353. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)