Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 39 issue 1 (february 2016) : 7-13

Genetic improvement of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) through introgression of yield enhancing traits and estimation of genetic parameters

Yerasu Suresh Reddy1, Akshay Talukdar*, Harsh Kumar Dikshit, V.P. Singh, Mukesh Rana2, Daya Chand
1<p>ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute,&nbsp;New Delhi-110 012, India.</p>
Cite article:- Reddy1 Suresh Yerasu, Talukdar* Akshay, Dikshit Kumar Harsh, Singh V.P., Rana2 Mukesh, Chand Daya (NaN). Genetic improvement of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) through introgression of yield enhancing traits and estimation of genetic parameters . Legume Research. 39(1): 7-13. doi: 10.18805/lr.v39i1.8856.

ABSTRACT

Enormous genetic variability was created as expressed in terms of range, mean and the coefficient of variations in all F2 populations studied. The crosses viz., L-830 × P-1117, JL-3 × P-22211 and SKL-259 × P-22211 produced higher percentage of transgressive segregants with desirable traits. Days to 50% flowering and days to maturity manifested high heritability, coupled with low genotypic coefficients of variation (GCV) and genetic gain, indicating requirement of selections for several successive generations for their improvement. Low to medium heritability accompanied by high coefficients of variation and genetic advance for seed yield indicates complexity of the character improvement through simple selection. High heritability accompanied by moderate to high GCV and genetic gain were observed for other yield components studied, which could be improved by simple selection in early generations. Thus, the study exhibited the possibilities of improving lentil genotypes through introgression of useful traits from exotic and indigenous germplasm.

REFERENCES


  1. Anonymous. (2007). Hand Book of Agriculture. ICAR Publication, New Delhi pp 1107-1112.

  2. Allard R.W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley and Sons Inc., London pp 92-94.

  3. Bicer, B. T. and Sarkar, D. (2004). Genetic variability and heritability for grain yield and other characters in lentil. J. Biologi. Sci., 4(2): 216-218.

  4. Burton, G. W. and Devane, E. M. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall Fescue (Festuca arunidinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron. J., 45: 478-481.

  5. Chahota, R. K. and Sharma, S. K. (1993). Studies on genetic variability and component analysis in microsperma and macrosperma lentils. Indian J. Genet., 53 (4): 411-417.

  6. Erskine, W. S., Chandra, M., Chaudhury, I. A., Malik, A., Sarker, B., Sharma, Tufail, M. and Tyagi, M. C. (1998). A bottleneck in lentil: widening the genetic base in South Asia. Euphytica, 101: 207–211.

  7. Fasoulus, A. (1981). Principles and Methods of Plant Breeding. Pub. no. 11. Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, Greece. 

  8. Gupta, D. and Sharma, K. (2007). Widening the gene pool of cultivated lentils through introgression of alien chromatin from wild Lens subspecies. Pl. Breeding, 126: 58-61.

  9. Hanson, C. H., Robinson, H. R. and Comstock, R. S. (1956). Biometrical studies of yield in segregating population of Korea Lespedeza. Agron. J., 48: 268-272.

  10. Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J., 47: 477-483.

  11. Kant, L. and Singh, D. P. (1998). Transgressive segregation of yield and yield components in lentil. Indian J. Genet., 58:343–347.

  12. Mather, K. and Jinks, J. L. (1982). Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London pp 396.

  13. Muehlbauer, F. J., Kaiser, W. J., Clement S. L. and Summerfield, R. J. (1995). Production and breeding of lentil. Adv. Agron., 54: 283-332.

  14. Powell, W. and Thomas, W. T. B. (1992). A comparison of the phenotypic distribution of single seed decent families and second cycle hybrids in barley. J. Genet Plant Breeding, 46:96–98.

  15. Reddy, A. A and Reddy, G. P. (2010). Supply Side Constrains in Production of Pulses in India: A Case Study of Lentil, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23:129-136.

  16. Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E. and Harvery, V. H. (1949). Estimates of heritability and degree of dominance in corn. Agron. J., 41: 353-359.

  17. Singh, G., Hafiz, M. and Manzar, A. ( 2006). Genetic variability for economic traits in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). New Botanist, 33: 117-122.

  18. Toklu, F., Bicer, B. T. and Karakoy, T. (2009). Agro- morphological characterization of the Turkish lentil landraces. African J. of Biotechnology. 8 (17):4121-4127.

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)