Banner

Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 38 issue 6 (december 2015) : 832-836

Influence of Zn, B and S on the yield and quality of groundnut  (Arachis Hypogea L.)

Bholanath Saha*, Sushanta Saha, Ritam Saha, G.C. Hazra, Biswapati Mandal
1<p>Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science,&nbsp;Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur-741 252, West Bengal, India.</p>

ABSTRACT

The effect of zinc (Zn), boron (B) and sulphur (S) on the yield and quality of groundnut in a field experiment with three levels of Zn (0, 5, 10 kg Zn ha-1 as Zn-EDTA as basal), two levels of B (0 and 0.25% boric acid as foliar spray) and three levels of S (0, 25, 50 kg S ha-1as CaSO4.2H2O) in a factorial RBD were studied. Basal application of Zn @ 5 and 10 kg ha-1 caused an increase in nut yield by 3.7% and 28.3% respectively over control, whereas, application of S @ 25 and 50 kg ha-1 increased the nut yield by 38.3% and 56.6% respectively over control. Conjoint application of Zn @ 10 kg ha-1 and S @ 50 kg ha-1 caused an increase in nut yield up to 73.4% over the control. Results, therefore, revealed that conjoint effect of S and Zn towards nut yield was more effective than that of B application. Application of Zn, S and B significantly increased their nutrient uptake in nuts. On an average, S, Zn and B uptake by groundnut ranged from 11.4 to 21.0 kg ha-1, 0.14 to 0.40 kg ha-1 and 0.12 to 0.25 kg ha-1, respectively. Integrated mode of application of Zn, B and S showed a positive interaction as yield increase with their uptake in groundnut. Oil content in nuts ranged from 45.3 to 54.4%, while iodine value ranged from 97.8 to 90.5%. Application of S and Zn significantly increased the oil content, while it significantly decreased the iodine value in groundnut. So, application of micronutrients viz. Zn and B as well as S fertilization could be a useful strategy not only to increase the yield but also the quality of groundnut. 

REFERENCES


  1. Ali, A.A.G., Mowafy, S.A.E. (2003). Effect of different levels of potassium and phosphorus fertilizers with the foliar application of zinc and boron on groundnut in sandy soils. Zagazig J. Agril. Res., 30: 335-358.

  2. Chesnin, L., Yien, C.H. (1951). Turbidimetric determination of available sulphate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 15: 149-151.

  3. Chitdeshwari, T., Poongothai, S. (2003). Yield of Groundnut and its Nutrient Uptake as Influenced by Zinc, Boron and Sulphur. Agril. Sci. Digest, 23: 263-266.

  4. Datta, S.P., Bhadoria, P.B.S., Kar, S. (1998). Availability of Extractable Boron in Some Acid Soils, West Bengal, India. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 29: 2285-2306.

  5. Ghosh, P.K., Dey, R., Pal, K.K., Mathur, R.K. (2005). Groundnut, In: Techniques and management of field crop production (Eds. Rathore, P. S.). Agrobios (India) Publishers, Jodhpur, India, 153-177.

  6. Ghosh, P.K., Hati, K.M., Mandal, K.G., Misra, A.K., Chaudhary, A.S., Bondopadhyay, K.K. (2000). Sulphur nutrition in oilseeds & oilseed-based cropping system. Fert. News, 45: 27-40.

  7. Gupta, S., Handore, K. (2009). Direct and residual effect of zinc and zinc amended organic manures on the zinc nutrition of field crop. Int. J. Agril. Sci., 1: 26-29.

  8. Hegde, D.M. (1998). Integrated nutrient management for production sustainability of oilseeds – A Review. J. Oilseeds Res., 15: 1-17.

  9. Jat, J.R., Mehra, R.K. (2007). Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield, macronutrient content and uptake by mustard. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 55: 190-195.

  10. Jamal, A., Moon, Y., Abdin, M.Z. (2010). Sulphur - a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Austr. J. Crop Sci., 4: 523-529.

  11. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Ltd., New Delhi, India.

  12. Katyal, J.C., Rattan, R.K. (1993). Distribution of Zinc in Indian Soils. Fert. News, 38: 15-26.

  13. Krisnasamy, R., Shanmugam, M., Poongothai, T. S., Vallippan, T. K., Mani, S., Vangamudi, M., Savithri, P., Devaranjan, R. (1994). Research Bulletin. 25 years of Micronutrient Research in Soils and Plants, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

  14. Nayak, S.C., Sarangi, D., Mishra, G.C., Rout, D.P. (2009). Response of groundnut to secondary and micronutrients. J. SAT Agril. Res., 7: 1-2.

  15. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-2, Second Edition, Soil Science Sociewty of America Journal. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

  16. Patel, G.N., Patel, P.T., Patel, P.H. (2008). Yield, water use efficiency and moisture extraction pattern of summer groundnut as influenced by irrigation schedules, sulphur levels & sources. J. SAT Agril. Res., 6: 1-4.

  17. Ravi, S., Channal, H.T., Hebsur N.S., Patil, B.N., Dharmatti, P.R. (2008). Effect of S, Zn & Fe nutrition on growth, yield & nutrient uptake & quality of safflower. Karnataka J. Agril. Sci., 21: 382-385.

  18. Revathi, M., Krishnaswamy, R., Chitdeswar. (1996). Effect of micronutrient chelates and yoeld of drymatter production of groundnut and paddy. Madras Agril. J., 83: 508-510.

  19. Sreemannarayana, B., Sreenivasa Raju, A. (1993). Direct and residual effect of applied sulphur in sunflower based cropping systems. Fert. News, 38: 39-42.

  20. Srinivasarao, C., Wani, S.P., Sahrawat, K.L., Rego, T.J., Pardhasaradhi, G. (2008). Zinc, boron and sulphur deficiencies are holding back the potential of rainfed crops in semi-arid India: experiences from participatory watershed management. Int. J. Plant Production, 2: 89-99.

  21. Veeramani, P., Subrahmaniyan, K. (2011). Nutrient Management for Sustainable Groundnut Productivity in India – A Review. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Tech., 3: 8138-8153.

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)