Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 38 issue 2 (april 2015) : 139-148

Impact of reproductive duration on yield and its component traits in lentil

Jitendra Kumar*, Ekta Srivatava
1Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India.
Cite article:- Kumar* Jitendra, Srivatava Ekta (2025). Impact of reproductive duration on yield and its component traits in lentil. Legume Research. 38(2): 139-148. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00077.6.

ABSTRACT

Development of early maturing genotypes with high biomass is one of the important aims of lentil breeding program as early genotypes escape terminal drought. Therefore, in the present study, impact of reproductive duration on yield and other traits was studied among 194 accessions of lentil. Significant variability was observed for reproductive duration and other agronomically important traits except harvest index. This study showed that reproductive duration had negative impact on yield but long reproductive duration helped to increase seed size. The results of this study showed that variability for reproductive duration depends upon days to 50% flowering rather than days to maturity as both these traits have highly significant negative correlation with each other. Therefore manipulation of days to 50% flowering is important to increase or decrease the reproduction duration. For making yield improvement in lentil, it is very important to increase biological yield/plant, which had positive relationship with grain yield. Plant height and pods/plant had positive impact on biological yield indicating that higher yield is not due to the efficient partitioning of photosynthetic assimilates. No association of harvest index with reproductive duration in present study also supported it. On the basis of scatter diagrams, genotype LL 864 was identified for maximum pods/plant, high biological yield and high yield, and genotype IC520341 for early flowering. These genotypes along with early vigor genotypes could be useful in lentil breeding program for developing early maturing high yielding genotypes in lentil.

REFERENCES

  1. AICRP. (2012–13) Project Coordinator’s Report on MULLARP, Rabi 2011-12. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
  2. Ali, N. and Wynne, J.C. (1994). Heritability estimates and correlation studies of early maturity and other agronomic traits in two crosses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Pak. J. Bot. 26: 75-82.
  3. Bell, M.J. wright G. C and. arch G. (1993). Environmental and agronomic effects on the growth of four peanut cultiars in a sub-tropical environment. II. Dry matter partitioning. Experimental Agriculture 29: 491-501.
  4. Chahota , R.K., Gupta V.P., and Sharma, S.K. (1996). Combining ability and genetic architecture of macrosoerma x microsperma derived crosses. Journal of Hill Research. 9: 341-346
  5. Chishti, S.A.S., Akbar, M., Aslam, M. and Anwar, M. (2000). Morphogenetic evaluation for pod yield and its components in early Spanish genotypes of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 3: 898-899.
  6. Culbreath, A.K. Todd, J.W., Gorbet, D.W., Brown, S.L., Baldwin, J.A., Pappu, H.R. and Shokes, F.M. (1999). Response of early, medium, and late maturing peanut breeding lines to field epidemics of tomato spotted wilt. Peanut Sci. 26: 100-106.
  7. Duncan, W.G., Mccloud, D.E., Mcgraw, R.L. and Boote, K.J. (1978). Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Sci. 18: 1015-1020.
  8. Ehlers, J.D. and Hall, A.E. (1996). Genotypic classification of cowpea based on responses to heat and photoperiod. Crop Sci. 36:673–679.
  9. Eriskine. W., Ellis, R.H., Summerfield, R.J., Roberts, E.H. and Hussain, A. (1990). Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 80: 193-199.
  10. Erskine,W. (1983). Relationship between the yield of seed and straw in lentil. Field Crops Res. 7: 115-121.
  11. Erskine,W., Sarker, A. and Kumar, S. (2011). Crops that feed the world 3. Investing in lentil improvement toward a food secure world. Food Security. 3: 127–139.
  12. FAOSTAT. (2010). ‘Production statistics.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome)
  13. Fouad, M., Imtiaz, M., Kumar. S. and Malhotra, R. ( 2011). Breeding food legumes for enhanced drought and heat tolerance to cope with climate change. In Food Security and Climate Change in Dry Areas. Proceedings of International Conference. ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria.
  14. Haro, R.J., Otegui, M.E., Collino, D.J. and Dardanelli, J.L. (2007). Seed yield determination and radiation use efficiency in irrigated peanut crop: Response to temperature and source-sink ratio variations. Field Crops Res. 103: 217-228.
  15. Jogloy, C., Jaisil, P., Akkasaeng, C., Kesmala, T. and Jogloy, S. (2010). Heritability and correlation for components of crop partitioning in advanced generations of peanut crosses. Asian J. Plant Sci. 10: 60-66.
  16. Joshi, N., Singh S. and Singh, I. (2005). Varability and association studies in lentil. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 18: 144-146.
  17. Kumar, S. and Srivastva, S.B.L. ( 2007). Estimation of genetic variances and combining ability in lentil (Lens culinaris). Indian J Agricultural Sciences. 77: 533-536.
  18. Kumar J., Basu, P.S., Srivastava, E., Chaturvedi, S.K., Nadarajan, N. and Kumar, S. (2012) Phenotyping of traits imparting drought tolerance in lentil. Crop and Pasture Science 63: 547-554.
  19. Mondal, M., Hakim, M.A., Juraimi, A.S. and Azad, M.A.K. (2011). Contribution of morpho-physiological attributes in determining yield of mungbean. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10: 12897–12904.
  20. Padi, F.K. (2008). Genotype x environment interaction for yield and raction to leaf spot infections in groundnut in semiarid West Africa: Genotype x environment and leaf spot resistance in groundnut. Euphytica. 164: 143-161.
  21. Patel, P.N. and Hall, A.E. (1990). Genotypic variation and classification of cowpea for reproductive responses to high temperature under long photoperiods. Crop Sci. 30: 614–621.
  22. Phakamas, N., Patanothai, A., Jogloy, S., Pannangpetch, K. and Hoogenboom, G. (2008). Physiological determinants for pod yield of peanut lines. Crop Sci. 48: 2351-2360.
  23. Pandey , A., Singh. D.P. and Singh, B.B. (1992). Interrelationship of yield and yield components in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) germplasm. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 5: 142-144.
  24. Rathi, A.S., Sindhu, J.S., Katiyar, R.P. and Katiyar, S.L. (2003). General combining ability studies in lentil. Legume Research. 26: 117-120.
  25. Sarker, A., Erskine, W. and Singh, M. (2005). Variation in shoot and root characteristics and their association with drought tolerance in lentil landraces. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52: 89-97.
  26. Silim, S.N., Saxena, M.C. and Erskine, W. (1993). Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment. II. Response to moisture supply. Expt. Agric. 29: 112-118.
  27. Singh, D.P, and Singh, B.B. (1991). Evaluation of exotic germplasm in lentil. Narendradeva J. Agric. Res. 6: 304-306.
  28. Singh, I.P, and Sing,. J.D . (2003). Combining ability analysis in lentil. Indian J Pulses Research. 16: 95-97.
  29. Sleper, D.A, and Poehlman, J.M. (2006). Breeding Field Crop. 5th Edn., Wiley-Blackwell Publ., USA., pp. 424.
  30. Thakare, R.G., Pawar, S.E., Jashua, D.C., Mitra, R. and Bhatia, C.R. (1982). Variation in some physiological components of yield in induced mutants of mungbean. In Induced Mutation-A tool in Plant Breeding. IAEA-SM-251/5. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
  31. Turk, K.J. and Hall, A. E. (1980) Drought adaptation of cowpea: II. Influence of drought on plant water status and relations with seed yield. Agron J . 72:421–427.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)